REVIEW
Three-dimensional echocardiography in the evaluation and management of paravalvular regurgitation
Menhel Kinno MD, MPH,
Sasan R. Raissi MD,
Kristoff A. Olson MD, MPH,
Vera H. Rigolin MD,
Menhel Kinno MD, MPH
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illionis
Search for more papers by this authorSasan R. Raissi MD
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illionis
Search for more papers by this authorKristoff A. Olson MD, MPH
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illionis
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Vera H. Rigolin MD
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illionis
Correspondence
Vera H. Rigolin, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorMenhel Kinno MD, MPH,
Sasan R. Raissi MD,
Kristoff A. Olson MD, MPH,
Vera H. Rigolin MD,
Menhel Kinno MD, MPH
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illionis
Search for more papers by this authorSasan R. Raissi MD
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illionis
Search for more papers by this authorKristoff A. Olson MD, MPH
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illionis
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Vera H. Rigolin MD
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illionis
Correspondence
Vera H. Rigolin, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Paravalvular regurgitation is an uncommon but serious complication that can be encountered after either surgical or percutaneous valve replacement and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Early detection and accurate assessment of paravalvular regurgitation are crucial to identify those who would benefit from intervention. Recent advances in 3-dimensional echocardiography have increased the feasibility of percutaneous approaches for the management of paravalvular regurgitation. Percutaneous closure of paravalvular regurgitation has emerged as a favorable alternative for redo surgery in selected cases. This article will review the role of 3-dimensional echocardiography in the assessment and management of paravalvular regurgitation.
REFERENCES
- 1Taramasso M, Maisano F, Latib A, et al. Conventional surgery and transcatheter closure via surgical transapical approach for paravalvular leak repair in high-risk patients: results from a single-centre experience. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014; 15: 1161–1167.
- 2Gilard M, Eltchaninoff H, Iung B, et al. Registry of transcatheter aortic-valve implantation in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366: 1705–1715.
- 3Hammermeister K, Sethi GK, Henderson WG, Grover FL, Oprian C, Rahimtoola SH. Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the Veterans Affairs randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 36: 1152–1158.
- 4Ionescu A, Fraser AG, Butchart EG. Prevalence and clinical significance of incidental paraprosthetic valvar regurgitation: a prospective study using transoesophageal echocardiography. Heart. 2003; 89: 1316–1321.
- 5Kodali SK, Williams MR, Smith CR, et al. Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366: 1686–1695.
- 6Pibarot P, Hahn RT, Weissman NJ, et al. Association of paravalvular regurgitation with 1-year outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the SAPIEN 3 Valve. JAMA Cardiol. 2017; 2: 1208–1216.
- 7Athappan G, Patvardhan E, Tuzcu EM, et al. Incidence, predictors, and outcomes of aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: meta-analysis and systematic review of literature. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 61: 1585–1595.
- 8De Cicco G, Russo C, Moreo A, et al. Mitral valve periprosthetic leakage: anatomical observations in 135 patients from a multicentre study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006; 30: 887–891.
- 9De Cicco G, Lorusso R, Colli A, et al. Aortic valve periprosthetic leakage: anatomic observations and surgical results. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005; 79: 1480–1485.
- 10Wasowicz M, Meineri M, Djaiani G, et al. Early complications and immediate postoperative outcomes of paravalvular leaks after valve replacement surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011; 25: 610–614.
- 11Rallidis LS, Moyssakis IE, Ikonomidis I, Nihoyannopoulos P. Natural history of early aortic paraprosthetic regurgitation: a five-year follow-up. Am Heart J. 1999; 138: 351–357.
- 12Sinning JM, Vasa-Nicotera M, Chin D, et al. Evaluation and management of paravalvular aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 62: 11–20.
- 13Saia F, Martinez C, Gafoor S, et al. Long-term outcomes of percutaneous paravalvular regurgitation closure after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a multicenter experience. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015; 8: 681–688.
- 14O'Rourke DJ, Palac RT, Malenka DJ, Marrin CA, Arbuckle BE, Plehn JF. Outcome of mild periprosthetic regurgitation detected by intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 38: 163–166.
- 15Nietlispach F, Maisano F, Sorajja P, Leon MB, Rihal C, Feldman T. Percutaneous paravalvular leak closure: chasing the chameleon. Eur Heart J. 2016; 37: 3495–3502.
- 16Hourihan M, Perry SB, Mandell VS, et al. Transcatheter umbrella closure of valvular and paravalvular leaks. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992; 20: 1371–1377.
- 17de Almeida Brandao CM, Pomerantzeff PM, Souza LR, et al. Multivariate analysis of risk factors for hospital mortality in valvular reoperations for prosthetic valve dysfunction. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002; 22: 922–926.
- 18Potter DD, Sundt TM 3rd, Zehr KJ, et al. Risk of repeat mitral valve replacement for failed mitral valve prostheses. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 78: 67–72; discussion 67-72.
- 19Echevarria JR, Bernal JM, Rabasa JM, Morales D, Revilla Y, Revuelta JM. Reoperation for bioprosthetic valve dysfunction. A decade of clinical experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1991; 5: 523–526; discussion 527.
- 20Ruiz CE, Jelnin V, Kronzon I, et al. Clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous closure of periprosthetic paravalvular leaks. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58: 2210–2217.
- 21Ruparelia N, Cao J, Newton JD, Wilson N, Daniels MJ, Ormerod OJ. Paravalvular leak closure under intracardiac echocardiographic guidance. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2018; 91: 958–965.
- 22Millan X, Skaf S, Joseph L, et al. Transcatheter reduction of paravalvular leaks: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Cardiol. 2015; 31: 260–269.
- 23Sorajja P, Cabalka AK, Hagler DJ, Rihal CS. The learning curve in percutaneous repair of paravalvular prosthetic regurgitation: an analysis of 200 cases. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014; 7: 521–529.
- 24Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 63: e57–e185.
- 25Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: a Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017; 70: 252–289.
- 26Garcia-Fernandez MA, Cortes M, Garcia-Robles JA, Gomez de Diego JJ, Perez-David E, Garcia E. Utility of real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in evaluating the success of percutaneous transcatheter closure of mitral paravalvular leaks. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010; 23: 26–32.
- 27Lang RM, Badano LP, Tsang W, et al. EAE/ASE recommendations for image acquisition and display using three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012; 25: 3–46.
- 28Zoghbi WA, Chambers JB, Dumesnil JG, et al. Recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and doppler ultrasound: a report From the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Task Force on Prosthetic Valves, developed in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology Cardiovascular Imaging Committee, Cardiac Imaging Committee of the American Heart Association, the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography, endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association, European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography, and Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009; 22: 975–1014; quiz 1082-4.
- 29Zoghbi WA, Adams D, Bonow RO, et al. Recommendations for noninvasive evaluation of native valvular regurgitation: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography Developed in Collaboration with the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017; 30: 303–371.
- 30Franco E, Almeria C, de Agustin JA, et al. Three-dimensional color Doppler transesophageal echocardiography for mitral paravalvular leak quantification and evaluation of percutaneous closure success. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014; 27: 1153–1163.
- 31Salustri A, Becker AE, van Herwerden L, Vletter WB, Ten Cate FJ, Roelandt JR. Three-dimensional echocardiography of normal and pathologic mitral valve: a comparison with two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996; 27: 1502–1510.
- 32Gossl M, Rihal CS. Percutaneous treatment of aortic and mitral valve paravalvular regurgitation. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2013; 15: 388.
- 33Cruz-Gonzalez I, Rama-Merchan JC, Calvert PA, et al. Percutaneous closure of paravalvular leaks: a systematic review. J Interv Cardiol. 2016; 29: 382–392.
- 34Pibarot P, Hahn RT, Weissman NJ, Monaghan MJ. Assessment of paravalvular regurgitation following TAVR: a proposal of unifying grading scheme. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015; 8: 340–360.
- 35Kappetein AP, Head SJ, Genereux P, et al. Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 60: 1438–1454.
- 36Zamorano JL, Badano LP, Bruce C, et al. EAE/ASE recommendations for the use of echocardiography in new transcatheter interventions for valvular heart disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011; 24: 937–965.
- 37Goncalves A, Almeria C, Marcos-Alberca P, et al. Three-dimensional echocardiography in paravalvular aortic regurgitation assessment after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012; 25: 47–55.
- 38Muraru D, Badano LP, Vannan M, Iliceto S. Assessment of aortic valve complex by three-dimensional echocardiography: a framework for its effective application in clinical practice. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012; 13: 541–555.
- 39Alkhouli M, Sarraf M, Maor E, et al. Techniques and outcomes of percutaneous aortic paravalvular leak closure. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016; 9: 2416–2426.
- 40Waterbury TM, Reeder GS, Pislaru SV, Cabalka AK, Rihal CS, Eleid MF. Techniques and outcomes of paravalvular leak repair after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017; 90: 870–877.
- 41Eleid MF, Cabalka AK, Malouf JF, Sanon S, Hagler DJ, Rihal CS. Techniques and outcomes for the treatment of paravalvular leak. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015; 8: e001945.
Citing Literature
