Volume 36, Issue 6 pp. 761-770
Research: Educational and Psychological Aspects

Exploring organizational support for the provision of structured self-management education for people with Type 2 diabetes: findings from a qualitative study

M. E. Carey

Corresponding Author

M. E. Carey

Leicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK

College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK

Correspondence to: Marian E. Carey. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
S. Agarwal

S. Agarwal

College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK

Search for more papers by this author
R. Horne

R. Horne

Leicester Diabetes Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK

Search for more papers by this author
M. Davies

M. Davies

Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK

Search for more papers by this author
M. Slevin

M. Slevin

School of Nursing, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK

Search for more papers by this author
V. Coates

V. Coates

School of Nursing, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK

Western Health and Social Care Trust, Londonderry, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 13 March 2019
Citations: 21

Abstract

Aim

To explore the organizational context in which Type 2 diabetes structured group education is provided.

Methods

Four Clinical Commissioning Groups in England providing Type 2 diabetes structured self-management education participated in a qualitative study exploring the context for provision of that education. Using UK National Diabetes Audit returns, two Clinical Commissioning Groups were selected that had non-attendance rates of ≤25%, and two that had non-attendance rates of ≥50%. Between May 2016 and August 2017, 20 interviews were conducted with Clinical Commissioning Group staff including: commissioners, healthcare professionals, managers, general practitioners and diabetes educators. Data gathering was prolonged as it proved challenging to engage with healthcare staff as a result of frequent local restructuring and service disruption.

Results

Local audits revealed discrepancies in basic data such as referral and attendance numbers compared with national audit data. There was a commonality in the themes identified from interviews: diabetes education was rarely embedded in service structure; where education uptake was poor, a lack of central support to delivery teams was noticeable; and where education uptake was positive, delivery teams were actively engaged, sometimes relying on enthusiastic individuals. Both situations put the local sustainability of diabetes education at risk.

Conclusions

There appears to be a link between attendance rates and organizational issues, therefore, when considering how to increase attendance rates, the state of the diabetes education infrastructure should be reviewed. Good uptake of diabetes education can be too reliant on the enthusiastic commitment of small teams or individuals delivering the education.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.