Volume 45, Issue 11 pp. 831-838
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

The spectrum of histopathologic findings in pemphigoid: Avoiding diagnostic pitfalls

Bonnie D. Hodge

Corresponding Author

Bonnie D. Hodge

University of Mississippi Medical Center School of Medicine, Jackson, Mississippi

Correspondence

Bonnie D. Hodge, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Department of Dermatology, 2500 North State Street, Jackson, MS 39216.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Jenna Roach

Jenna Roach

Department of Dermatology, Texas Tech Health Science Center, Lubbock, Texas

Search for more papers by this author
Jeave L. Reserva

Jeave L. Reserva

Department of Dermatology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, District of Columbia

Search for more papers by this author
Tejal Patel

Tejal Patel

Department of Pathology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi

Search for more papers by this author
Amber Googe

Amber Googe

Department of Pediatrics, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi

Search for more papers by this author
Jennifer Schulmeier

Jennifer Schulmeier

Department of Dermatology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi

Search for more papers by this author
Robert T. Brodell

Robert T. Brodell

Department of Dermatology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi

Department of Dermatology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 August 2018
Citations: 13

Abstract

Background

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is an autoimmune vesiculobullous dermatitis that primarily affects the elderly and presents with tense, fluid-filled blisters. The histological hallmark on routine hematoxylin & eosin (H&E)-stained specimens is a subepidermal blister with luminal eosinophils. However, there are histologic variants than can produce diagnostic confusion.

Methods

All immunofluorescence reports from an independent certified dermatopathology laboratory (2006-2015) were inspected, and those with findings consistent with an autoimmune subepidermal blistering process were selected. Seventy-seven cases were identified, and the corresponding H&E-stained specimens were reviewed by two dermatopathologists who tabulated the histopathologic findings.

Results

Just over half of biopsies showed subepidermal clefting (54%). The histologic variants included: urticarial or eczematous findings (17%), partial or complete re-epithelialization (28%), and epidermal necrosis (7%).

Conclusion

While re-epithelialization of subepidermal blisters is a commonly accepted phenomenon, there are no published data demonstrating its incidence. Because only half of the biopsies showed the classic subepidermal blister, it is important to be aware of the spectrum of histopathologic findings that occur in this disease. Specifically, the presence of an intraepidermal blister and/or epidermal necrosis on routine H&E-stained specimens does not preclude the diagnosis of pemphigoid.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.