Volume 21, Issue 5 pp. 532-537
Original Article

Colon capsule endoscopy for colonic surveillance

R. Kroijer

Corresponding Author

R. Kroijer

Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark

Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

Odense Patient Data Explorative Network OPEN, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

Correspondence to: Rasmus Krøijer, Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark.

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
M. Kobaek-Larsen

M. Kobaek-Larsen

Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark

Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
N. Qvist

N. Qvist

Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark

Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
T. Knudsen

T. Knudsen

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital South West Jutland, Esbjerg, Denmark

Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
G. Baatrup

G. Baatrup

Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark

Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 13 January 2019
Citations: 29

Abstract

Aim

Resources used in surveillance colonoscopies are taking up an increasing proportion of colonoscopy capacity. Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is a promising technique for noninvasive investigation of the colon. We aimed to investigate CCE as a possible filter in colonic surveillance with the primary outcome of reducing the number of colonoscopies.

Method

Patients scheduled for follow-up colonoscopy were subjected to a primary CCE and only supplemental conventional endoscopy if significant pathology was detected or if the CCE examination was incomplete. Significant pathology was defined as more than two small polyps, or one polyp greater than 9 mm or any polyp in patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Supplemental endoscopy was carried out to the extent needed to resect the detected polyps and investigate the parts of the colon that were not sufficiently visualized by the capsule.

Results

A total of 180 patients were included. Seventy-seven patients (43%) had a complete CCE with no significant findings. A complete colonoscopy was carried out in 67 patients (37%) and 36 patients (20%) underwent a sigmoidoscopy. In the 103 patients undergoing endoscopy, 59 (57%) had no adenomas detected, 33 (32%) had ‘low-risk’ adenomas and 11 (11%) had ‘high-risk’ adenomas.

Conclusion

The introduction of CCE as filter test in colonic surveillance reduced colonoscopies by 43%, but this implies that untreated polyps are left behind and is not cost-effective. The CCE completion rate must be improved.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.