Volume 15, Issue 10 pp. 1253-1256
Original Article

Close collaboration between local and specialist multidisciplinary teams allows ‘fast-tracking’ of patients with colorectal liver metastases

S. P. Vasudevan

S. P. Vasudevan

The ICENI Centre, Colchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Colchester, UK

Search for more papers by this author
A. B. Cresswell

A. B. Cresswell

The Basingstoke Hepatobiliary Unit, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, UK

Search for more papers by this author
J. M. Wright

J. M. Wright

The ICENI Centre, Colchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Colchester, UK

Search for more papers by this author
M. Rees

M. Rees

The Basingstoke Hepatobiliary Unit, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, UK

Search for more papers by this author
D. Stiff

D. Stiff

The ICENI Centre, Colchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Colchester, UK

Search for more papers by this author
A. Wordley

A. Wordley

The ICENI Centre, Colchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Colchester, UK

Search for more papers by this author
R. W. Motson

Corresponding Author

R. W. Motson

The ICENI Centre, Colchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Colchester, UK

Correspondence to: Professor R. W. Motson, The ICENI Centre, Colchester Hospital, Turner Road, Colchester CO4 5JL, UK.

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 22 June 2013
Citations: 8
Meeting presentation: This work was presented at the International Surgical Congress of the Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland, Liverpool, UK, 9–11 May 2012.

Abstract

Aim

The ongoing evolution of treatment strategies for colorectal liver metastases necessarily requires all patients to be reviewed at some point by the specialist hepatobiliary unit. This process can be streamlined through close collaboration with the local colorectal multidisciplinary team (MDT). The study was performed to see if a local colorectal MDT was able to make a correct decision regarding potential operability of liver metastases, by comparing its decision with that of two hepatobiliary surgeons in our referral centre.

Method

CT scans of 38 patients found to have liver metastases from colorectal cancer were anonymized and sent to two hepatobiliary surgeons in our cancer network. They classified them into three categories: R, resectable; C, chemotherapy to downsize then consider resection; U, unresectable. The results were then compared with the opinion of our colorectal MDT, made before the referral to the hepatobiliary surgeons.

Results

The two independent hepatobiliary surgeons agreed with each other on 35/38 (92%) of CT scans. Our colorectal MDT agreed with the hepatobiliary surgeons in 36/38 (95%) of cases. Only 9 (32%) of the 28 patients deemed suitable on the CT scan by the hepatobiliary surgeons actually had a liver resection.

Conclusion

The results show that a local colorectal MDT is able to make an accurate assessment of the operability of liver metastases. Patients deemed to be inoperable by the colorectal MDT could be ‘fast-tracked’ to the hepatobiliary MDT with review of imaging only, saving time and resources by avoiding referral of patients who are not suitable for liver resection.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.