Volume 44, Issue 6 pp. 927-934
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Clinical feeding examination with cervical auscultation for detecting oropharyngeal aspiration: A systematic review of the evidence

Thuy T. Frakking PhD

Corresponding Author

Thuy T. Frakking PhD

Speech Pathology Department & Research Development Unit, Metro North Hospital & Health Service, Queensland Health, Caboolture Hospital, Caboolture, QLD, Australia

School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia

Correspondence

Thuy T. Frakking, Research Development Unit, Caboolture Hospital, McKean St, Caboolture, 4510, QLD, Australia.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Anne B. Chang PhD

Anne B. Chang PhD

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Queensland Children's Hospital, QLD, Australia

Child Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, NT, Australia

Centre for Children's Health Research, Queensland University of Technology, QLD, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Michael David PhD

Michael David PhD

School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Gosford, NSW, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Jane Orbell-Smith

Jane Orbell-Smith

Library Services, Metro North Hospital & Health Service, Caboolture Hospital, Caboolture, QLD, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Kelly A. Weir PhD

Kelly A. Weir PhD

School of Allied Health Sciences, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

Clinical Governance, Education & Research, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, QLD, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 12 July 2019
Citations: 8

Abstract

Background

Cervical auscultation (i.e. listening to swallowing sounds) is the most commonly used technique in adjuvant to the clinical feeding examination by speech-language pathologists worldwide to assess for oropharyngeal aspiration risk in children. Despite its relative popularity in clinical practice, little is known on the clinical utility of cervical auscultation within a paediatric population.

Objective

To determine the diagnostic test accuracy of the clinical feeding examination with cervical auscultation in the detection of aspiration in children.

Type of review

Narrative review. Prospero Registration: CRD42017081467 Search strategy: Medline/Pub Med, Embase, CINAHL, AustHealth, Cochrane and UQ (Scopus) were searched up until October 2017. Specifically, the search terms used were: (((oropharyngeal OR respiratory) aspiration) AND (child* OR pediatr* OR paediatr*) and (cervical auscultation OR swallow sounds OR swallowing sounds OR accelerometry OR swallowing acoustics)). The search strategy also included scanning reference lists and citations of retrieved studies.

Evaluation method

Extracted studies were reviewed by two independent reviewers. Methodological quality of studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool.

Results

Only one study met inclusion criteria for this review, which had a bias for flow and timing. Use of cervical auscultation in conjunction with the clinical feeding examination to predict aspiration had a positive predictor value (PPV) of only 0.49 (0.31-0.66), indicating potential over-prediction of aspiration when cervical auscultation is used. In contrast a high NPV of 0.92 (0.78-0.98) was reported indicating that cervical auscultation is useful at ruling out aspiration in children.

Conclusion

This review highlights the paucity of research studies assessing the accuracy of cervical auscultation as an adjuvant to the clinical feeding examination in aspiration detection within the paediatric population.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

TTF, ABC, MD and KAW previously published a randomised control trial comparing the utility of cervical auscultation in the detection of oropharyngeal aspiration in children with dysphagia.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.