Volume 26, Issue S11 pp. 202-206
Report

Therapeutic concepts and methods for improving dental implant outcomes. Summary and consensus statements. The 4th EAO Consensus Conference 2015

Mariano Sanz

Corresponding Author

Mariano Sanz

Faculty of Odontology at the University Complutense, Madrid, Spain

Corresponding author:

Mariano Sanz

Professor and Chairman of Periodontology, University Complutense of Madrid, Faculty of Odontology, Plaza Ramon y Cajal, E-28040 Madrid, Spain

Tel.: +34913942010

Fax: +34913941910

e-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Nikos Donos

Nikos Donos

UCL Eastman Dental Institute, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Gil Alcoforado

Gil Alcoforado

Private Practice, Lisbon, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
Marc Balmer

Marc Balmer

Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Katarzyna Gurzawska

Katarzyna Gurzawska

Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Nikos Mardas

Nikos Mardas

UCL Eastman Dental Institute, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Iva Milinkovic

Iva Milinkovic

University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia

Search for more papers by this author
David Nisand

David Nisand

Private Practice, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author
Isabella Rocchietta

Isabella Rocchietta

University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
Andreas Stavropoulos

Andreas Stavropoulos

Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
Daniel S. Thoma

Daniel S. Thoma

Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Ferruccio Torsello

Ferruccio Torsello

Eastman Dental Hospital, Rome, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 09 September 2015
Citations: 29

Abstract

Background

Different therapeutic concepts and methods have been proposed for improving dental implant outcomes in three specific clinical situations: (i) the fresh extraction socket with alveolar ridge preservation protocols; (ii) the posterior maxilla with limited bone height with either the placement of regular-sized implants after sinus elevation and grafting or short dental implants and; (iii) the posterior mandible with limited bone height with either vertical bone augmentation and placement of implants or short dental implants.

Materials and methods

Three systematic reviews, based on randomized and controlled clinical trials have evaluated the efficacy of these different therapeutic modalities in terms of dental implant outcomes.

Results and conclusions

Interventions aimed for alveolar ridge preservation have shown efficacy in terms of allowing the placement of dental implants and for reducing the need of further augmentation procedures at implant placement. Both therapeutic options, the placement of implants after sinus elevation and grafting or short dental implants, were valid alternatives in the treatment of the posterior maxilla with deficient bone availability, although short implants resulted in fewer complications. Similarly, the placement of implants in vertically augmented bone rendered comparable outcomes with those of short implants in the treatment of the posterior mandible, but short implants resulted in fewer complications.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.