Volume 27, Issue 12 pp. 1506-1510
Original Article

Papillary fill response in single-tooth implants using abutments of different geometry

Ratnadeep Patil

Corresponding Author

Ratnadeep Patil

Department of Clinical Dentistry, Smile Care®, Mumbai, India

Corresponding author:

Ratnadeep Patil, BDS

Department of Clinical Dentistry

Smile Care®, 13 Geetanjali 234 S V Road

Bandra West

Mumbai 400050

Maharashtra, India

Tel.: +91 26431670

Fax: +91 26416342

e-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Laurens den Hartog

Laurens den Hartog

Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery and Special Dental Care, University Medical Center, The University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Anjali Dilbaghi

Anjali Dilbaghi

Department of Clinical Dentistry, Smile Care®, Mumbai, India

Search for more papers by this author
Bart de Jong

Bart de Jong

Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics, Center for Dentistry and Oral Hygiene, University Medical Center, The University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Wouter Kerdijk

Wouter Kerdijk

Department of Public an Individual Oral Health, Center for Dentistry and Oral Hygiene, University Medical Center, The University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Marco S. Cune

Marco S. Cune

Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics, Center for Dentistry and Oral Hygiene, University Medical Center, The University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

Department of Oral-Maxillofacial Surgery, Prosthodontics and Special Dental Care, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 06 April 2015
Citations: 7

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the influence of abutment geometry on papillary fill in the esthetic zone in a delayed crown protocol.

Materials and methods

Twenty-six subjects received two non-adjacent endosseous implants in the esthetic zone. Functional temporary crowns were installed 17–19 weeks later, using conventional (control) and curved (experimental) abutments. The abutments were randomized in each patient independently. Final crowns were cemented after 2 months (T0). Standard intraoral photographs and radiographs were made to evaluate papillary fill after 12 months (T12). The interproximal papilla fill was measured by means of the papilla index score (PIS) and related to the maximum bone level between the implant and the adjacent root as well as the peri-implant marginal bone level at T12, both measured radiographically.

Results

No statistically significant difference between the experimental and the control group could be demonstrated (P = 0.25). Ordinal regression analysis showed a positive correlation between the maximum bone level and papilla fill (P < 0.01) and a negative correlation between the peri-implant marginal bone level and papilla fill (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

A concave abutment does not exhibit a better fill of the papilla compared with a straight abutment in single-tooth implant placement using a delayed protocol in the esthetic zone after 12 months of function.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.