Volume 12, Issue 4 pp. 491-496
SPECIAL ISSUE ARTICLE

Transatlantic medical consultation and second opinion in pediatric cardiology has benefit past patient care: A case study in videoconferencing

Lubica Kovacikova MD, PhD

Corresponding Author

Lubica Kovacikova MD, PhD

Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Bratislava, Slovakia

Correspondence Lubica Kovacikova, Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Bratislava, Slovakia. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Martin Zahorec MD, PhD

Martin Zahorec MD, PhD

Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Bratislava, Slovakia

Search for more papers by this author
Peter Skrak MD, PhD

Peter Skrak MD, PhD

Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Bratislava, Slovakia

Search for more papers by this author
Brian D. Hanna MDCM, PhD

Brian D. Hanna MDCM, PhD

Division of Cardiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, The Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Search for more papers by this author
R. Lee Vogel MD

R. Lee Vogel MD

Division of Cardiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, The Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 May 2017
Citations: 4

Abstract

Background

Telemedicine is a rapidly evolving form of modern information and communication technology used to deliver clinical services and educational activities.

Objective

The aim of this article is to report and analyze our experience with transatlantic consultation via videoconferencing in pediatric cardiology.

Methods

In February, 2013, videoconferencing project was launched between a medium-volume pediatric cardiac center in Bratislava, Slovakia and subspecialty experts from a high-volume pediatric cardiac program at The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), USA. During 1.5–2 hours videoconferences, 2–3 patients with similar complex clinical scenarios were presented to CHOP experts. The main goal of the project was consultation on individual patients to validate, alter or radically change clinical management plans.

Results

From February, 2013 to January, 2017, 25 videoconferences occurred and 73 cases were discussed. The median patient age was 52 months (range; 1 day–30 years). Forty-six discussed cases were outpatients, 21 patients were in the intensive care unit and 6 patients were discussed post mortem. Thirty-one CHOP experts from different subspecialties participated actively in patient consultations. The most frequent recommendations were related to single ventricle, pulmonary hypertension or heart failure patients and intervention in complex and/or rare cardiac diseases. Specialists from CHOP agreed completely with the original care plan in 16% of cases. In 52% cases, adjustments to original plan were suggested. Radical changes were recommended in 30% of cases. Receiving institution adopted recommendations to the patient care fully in 79% and partially in 13% of patients.

Conclusions

Based on our 4-year experience we consider videoconferencing between medium-size pediatric cardiac center and subspecialty experts from a high-volume pediatric cardiac program a suitable form of medical consultations. Videoconferencing assists in clinical decision making for complex patient cases and serves as an effective educational tool to gain knowledge and experience “without borders.”

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.