The State of the Art in HDR Deghosting: A Survey and Evaluation
Okan Tarhan Tursun
Dept. of Computer Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Turkey
Search for more papers by this authorAhmet Oğuz Akyüz
Dept. of Computer Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Turkey
Search for more papers by this authorAykut Erdem
Dept. of Computer Engineering, Hacettepe University, Turkey
Search for more papers by this authorErkut Erdem
Dept. of Computer Engineering, Hacettepe University, Turkey
Search for more papers by this authorOkan Tarhan Tursun
Dept. of Computer Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Turkey
Search for more papers by this authorAhmet Oğuz Akyüz
Dept. of Computer Engineering, Middle East Technical University, Turkey
Search for more papers by this authorAykut Erdem
Dept. of Computer Engineering, Hacettepe University, Turkey
Search for more papers by this authorErkut Erdem
Dept. of Computer Engineering, Hacettepe University, Turkey
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Obtaining a high quality high dynamic range (HDR) image in the presence of camera and object movement has been a long-standing challenge. Many methods, known as HDR deghosting algorithms, have been developed over the past ten years to undertake this challenge. Each of these algorithms approaches the deghosting problem from a different perspective, providing solutions with different degrees of complexity, solutions that range from rudimentary heuristics to advanced computer vision techniques. The proposed solutions generally differ in two ways: (1) how to detect ghost regions and (2) what to do to eliminate ghosts. Some algorithms choose to completely discard moving objects giving rise to HDR images which only contain the static regions. Some other algorithms try to find the best image to use for each dynamic region. Yet others try to register moving objects from different images in the spirit of maximizing dynamic range in dynamic regions. Furthermore, each algorithm may introduce different types of artifacts as they aim to eliminate ghosts. These artifacts may come in the form of noise, broken objects, under- and over-exposed regions, and residual ghosting. Given the high volume of studies conducted in this field over the recent years, a comprehensive survey of the state of the art is required. Thus, the first goal of this paper is to provide this survey. Secondly, the large number of algorithms brings about the need to classify them. Thus the second goal of this paper is to propose a taxonomy of deghosting algorithms which can be used to group existing and future algorithms into meaningful classes. Thirdly, the existence of a large number of algorithms brings about the need to evaluate their effectiveness, as each new algorithm claims to outperform its precedents. Therefore, the last goal of this paper is to share the results of a subjective experiment which aims to evaluate various state-of-the-art deghosting algorithms.
References
- Agarwala A., Dontcheva M., Agrawala M., Drucker S., Colburn A., Curless B., Salesin D., Cohen M.: Interactive digital photomontage. ACM Trans. on Graphics 23, 3 (2004), 294–302. 5
- Akyüz A. O.: Photographically guided alignment for HDR images. EurographicsAreas Papers (2011), 73–74. 4, 5
- An J., Lee S.H., Kuk J.G., Cho N.I.: A multiexposure image fusion algorithm without ghost effect. In Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), IEEE Int. Conf. on (2011), IEEE, pp. 1565–1568. 4, 9
- Achanta R., Shaji A., Smith K., Lucchi A., Fua P., Süsstrunk S.: SLIC superpixels. Tech. rep., EPFL Technical Report, 2010. 6
- Burt P.J., Adelson E.H.: The laplacian pyramid as a compact image code. Communications, IEEE Transactions on 31, 4 (1983), 532–540. 11, 15
- Banterle F., Artusi A., Debattista K., Chalmers A.: Advanced High Dynamic Range Imaging: Theory and Practice, first edition ed. CRC Press (AK Peters), Natick, MA, 2011. 1
10.1201/b11373 Google Scholar
- Bergen J.R., Anandan P., Hanna K.J., Hingorani R.: Hierarchical modelbased motion estimation. In Computer Vision ECCV'92 (1992), Springer, pp. 237–252. 13
10.1007/3-540-55426-2_27 Google Scholar
- Burt P.J., Kolczynski R.J.: Enhanced image capture through fusion. In Computer Vision, Fourth Int. Conf. on (1993), IEEE, pp. 173–182. 2
- Brown M., Lowe D.G.: Recognising panoramas. In Proceedings of the 9th IEEE Int. Conf. on Computer Vision Volume 2 (Washington, DC, USA, 2003), ICCV, IEEE Computer Society. 5
- Bogoni L.: Extending dynamic range of monochrome and color images through fusion. In Pattern Recognition, 15th Int. Conf. on (2000), vol. 3, IEEE, pp. 7–12. 4, 11, 13
- Barnes C., Shechtman E., Finkelstein A., Goldman D.: PatchMatch: A randomized correspondence algorithm for structural image editing. ACM Trans. on Graphics 28, 3 (2009), 24. 13
- Barnes C., Shechtman E., Goldman D.B., Finkelstein A.: The generalized PatchMatch correspondence algorithm. In Computer Vision-ECCV. Springer, 2010, pp. 29–43. 13
- Baker S., Scharstein D., Lewis J., Roth S., Black M.J., Szeliski R.: A database and evaluation methodology for optical flow. Int. Journal of Computer Vision 92, 1 (2011), 1–31. 3
- Boykov Y., Veksler O., Zabih R.: Fast approximate energy minimization via graph cuts. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on 23, 11 (2001), 1222–1239. 6, 9
- Candocia F.M.: Simultaneous homographic and comparametric alignment of multiple exposureadjusted pictures of the same scene. Image Processing, IEEE Transactions on 12, 12 (2003), 1485–1494. 4
- Castro T., Chapiro A., Cicconet M., Velho L.: Towards mobile hdr video. Proceedings of the EurographicsAreas Papers (2011), 75–76. 4, 14
- Chapiro A., Cicconet M., Velho L.: Filter based deghosting for exposure fusion video. In ACM SIGGRAPH Posters (2011), ACM, p. 33. 4, 14
- Cerman L., Hlavac V.: Exposure time estimation for high dynamic range imaging with hand held camera. In Proc. of Computer Vision Winter Workshop, Czech Republic (2006), Citeseer. 4, 5
- Coffin D.: DCRaw: Decoding raw digital photos in linux. Accessed: February 2014. URL: http://www.cybercom.net/~dcoffin/dcraw/.15
- Comby F., Strauss O.: Using quasicontinuous histograms for fuzzy main motion estimation in video sequence. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 158, 5 (2007), 475–495. 6
- Debevec P.E., Malik J.: Recovering high dynamic range radiance maps from photographs. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conf. on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (1997), SIGGRAPH, ACM Press/AddisonWesley Publishing Co., pp. 369–378. 2, 5, 9, 12, 15
- Durbin J.: Incomplete blocks in ranking experiments. British Journal of Statistical Psychology 4, 2 (1951), 85–90. 17
10.1111/j.2044-8317.1951.tb00310.x Google Scholar
- Eden A., Uyttendaele M., Szeliski R.: Seamless image stitching of scenes with large motions and exposure differences. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, IEEE Computer Soc. Conf. on (2006), vol. 2, pp. 2498–2505. 4, 5
- Fischler M.A., Bolles R.C.: Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Communications of the ACM 24, 6 (1981), 381–395. 5, 12
- Ferradans S., Bertalmío M., Provenzi E., Caselles V.: Generation of HDR images in nonstatic conditions based on gradient fusion. In VISAPP (2012), pp. 31–37. 4, 11
- Fattal R., Lischinski D., Werman M.: Gradient domain high dynamic range compression. ACM Trans. on Graphics 21, 3 (2002), 249–256. 8
- Granados M., Ajdin B., Wand M., Theobalt C., Seidel H.P., Lensch H.: Optimal HDR reconstruction with linear digital cameras. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), IEEE Conf. on (2010), IEEE, pp. 215–222. 2
- Gevrekci M., Gunturk B.K.: On geometric and photometric registration of images. In Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, IEEE Int. Conf. on (2007), vol. 1, IEEE. 4, 5
- Gallo O., Gelfand N., Chen W.C., Tico M., Pulli K.: Artifactfree high dynamic range imaging. In Computational Photography (ICCP), IEEE Int. Conf. on (2009), IEEE, pp. 1–7. 4, 8
- Granados M., Kim K.I., Tompkin J., Theobalt C.: Automatic noise modeling for ghostfree HDR reconstruction. ACM Trans. on Graphics 32, 6 (2013), 201. 4, 10
- Grossberg M.D., Nayar S.K.: Determining the camera response from images: What is knowable? Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on 25, 11 (2003), 1455–1467. 2, 7, 13
- Grosch T.: Fast and robust high dynamic range image generation with camera and object movement. Vision, Modeling and Visualization, RWTH Aachen (2006), 277–284. 4, 7, 9, 14, 18, 19, 21
- Granados M., Seidel H.P., Lensch H.: Background estimation from nontime sequence images. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface (2008), Canadian Information Processing Society, pp. 33–40. 4, 6
- Hafner D., Demetz O., Weickert J.: Simultaneous HDR and optic flow computation. In Pattern Recognition (ICPR 2014), Proc. 22nd Int. Conf. on (2014), IEEE. 4, 12
10.1109/ICPR.2014.360 Google Scholar
- Hossain I., Gunturk B.K.: High dynamic range imaging of nonstatic scenes. In IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging (2011), Int. Society for Optics and Photonics. 4, 11
- Hu J., Gallo O., Pulli K.: Exposure stacks of live scenes with handheld cameras. In Computer Vision-ECCV. Springer, 2012, pp. 499–512. 4, 12
- Hu J., Gallo O., Pulli K., Sun X.: HDR deghosting: How to deal with saturation. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), IEEE Conf. on. IEEE (2013). 3, 4, 13, 14, 18
- Heo Y.S., Lee K.M., Lee S.U., Moon Y., Cha J.: Ghostfree high dynamic range imaging. In Computer VisionACCV. Springer, 2010, pp. 486–500. 4, 9
- Harris C., Stephens M.: A combined corner and edge detector. In Alvey vision Conf. (1988), vol. 15, Manchester, UK, p. 50. 14
- HaCohen Y., Shechtman E., Goldman D.B., Lischinski D.: Nonrigid dense correspondence with applications for image enhancement. ACM Trans. on Graphics 30, 4 (2011), 70. 12
- Hadziabdic K.K., Telalovic J.H., Mantiuk R.: Expert evaluation of deghosting algorithms for multiexposure high dynamic range imaging. In Second Int. Conf. and SME Workshop on HDR imaging (HDRi 2014) (2014). 3
- Hugin: Panorama photo stitcher. Accessed: September 2014. URL: http://hugin.sourceforge.net/. 15
- Im J., Jang S., Lee S., Paik J.: Geometrical transformationbased ghost artifacts removing for high dynamic range image. In Image Processing (ICIP), 18th IEEE Int. Conf. on (2011), IEEE, pp. 357–360. 5
- IM J., Lee S., Paik J.: Improved elastic registration for removing ghost artifacts in high dynamic imaging. Consumer Electronics, IEEE Transactions on 57, 2 (2011), 932–935. 4, 5
- Jacobs K., Loscos C., Ward G.: Automatic highdynamic range image generation for dynamic scenes. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 28, 2 (2008), 84–93. 4, 7, 8, 13
- Jinno T., Okuda M.: Multiple exposure fusion for high dynamic range image acquisition. Image Processing, IEEE Transactions on 21, 1 (2012), 358–365. 4, 11
- Khan E.A., Akyüz A. O., Reinhard E.: Ghost removal in high dynamic range images. In Image Processing, IEEE Int. Conf. on (2006), IEEE, pp. 2005–2008. 4, 6, 14, 18, 19, 20
- Kao W.C., Hsu C.C., Chen L.Y., Kao C.C., CHEN S.H.: Integrating image fusion and motion stabilization for capturing still images in high dynamic range scenes. Consumer Electronics, IEEE Transactions on 52, 3 (2006), 735–741. 4, 7
- KaraduzovicHadziabdic K., Telalovic J.H., Mantiuk R.: Comparison of deghosting algorithms for multiexposure high dynamic range imaging. In Spring Conf. on Computer Graphics (2013), ACM, pp. 21–28. 3
- Kovesi P.: Image features from phase congruency. Videre: Jrnl. of computer vision research 1, 3 (1999), 1–26. 5
- Kalantari N.K., Shechtman E., Barnes C., Darabi S., Goldman D.B., Sen P.: Patchbased high dynamic range video. ACM Trans. Graph. 32, 6 (2013). 4, 14
- Kang S.B., Uyttendaele M., Winder S., Szeliski R.: High dynamic range video. ACM Trans. on Graphics 22, 3 (2003), 319–325. 4, 13, 14
- Lin H.Y., Chang W.Z.: High dynamic range imaging for stereoscopic scene representation. In Image Processing (ICIP), 16th IEEE Int. Conf. on (2009), pp. 4305–4308. 4, 7
- Lucas B.D., Kanade T., et al.: An iterative image registration technique with an application to stereo vision. In IJCAI (1981), vol. 81, pp. 674–679. 13
- Lee C., Li Y., Monga V.: Ghostfree high dynamic range imaging via rank minimization. Signal Processing Letters, IEEE 21, 9 (2014), 1045–1049. 4, 10
- Lowe D.G.: Distinctive image features from scaleinvariant keypoints. Int. journal of computer vision 60, 2 (2004), 91–110. 5
- Lee D.K., Park R.H., Chang S.: Improved histogram based ghost removal in exposure fusion for high dynamic range images. In Consumer Electronics (ISCE), IEEE 15th Int. Symposium on (2011), IEEE, pp. 586–591. 4, 8
10.1109/ISCE.2011.5973898 Google Scholar
- LI Z., Rahardja S., Zhu Z., Xie S., Wu S.: Movement detection for the synthesis of high dynamic range images. In Image Processing (ICIP), 17th IEEE Int. Conf. on (2010), IEEE, pp. 3133–3136. 4, 8, 12
- Liu Y., Wang J., Cho S., Finkelstein A., Rusinkiewicz S.: A noreference metric for evaluating the quality of motion deblurring. ACM Trans. Graph. 32, 6 (2013), 175. 3, 21, 22
- Menzel N., Guthe M.: Freehand HDR photography with motion compensation. In VMV (2007), pp. 127–134. 4, 12
- Mangiat S., Gibson J.: High dynamic range video with ghost removal. In SPIE Optical Engineering+ Applications (2010), Int. Society for Optics and Photonics. 4, 14
- Mangiat S., Gibson J.: Spatially adaptive filtering for registration artifact removal in hdr video. In Image Processing, 18th IEEE Int. Conf. on (2011), IEEE, pp. 1317–1320. 14
- Mertens T., Kautz J., Van Reeth F.: Exposure fusion. In Computer Graphics and Applications, 15th Pacific Conf. on (2007), IEEE, pp. 382–390. 8, 9, 10, 13, 14
- Mann S., Manders C., Fung J.: Painting with looks: Photographic images from video using quantimetric processing. In Proceedings of the tenth ACM Int. Conf. on Multimedia (2002), ACM, pp. 117–126. 4
10.1145/641007.641032 Google Scholar
- Mitsunaga T., Nayar S.K.: Radiometric self calibration. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, IEEE Computer Society Conf. on. (1999), vol. 1, IEEE. 2
- Matsushita Y., Ofek E., Ge W., Tang X., Shum H.Y.: Fullframe video stabilization with motion inpainting. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on 28, 7 (2006), 1150–1163. 14
- Malm H., Oskarsson M., Warrant E., Clarberg P., Hasselgren J., Lejdfors C.: Adaptive enhancement and noise reduction in very low lightlevel video. In Computer Vision, IEEE 11th Int. Conf. on (2007), IEEE, pp. 1–8. 9
- Mann S., Picard R.W.: On Being ‘undigital’ With Digital Cameras: Extending Dynamic Range By Combining Differently Exposed Pictures. Tech. Rep. 323, M.I.T. Media Lab Perceptual Computing Section, Boston, Massachusetts, 1994. also appears IS&T's 48th annual conference, Cambridge, Massachusetts, May 1995. 2
- Min T.H., Park R.H., Chang S.: Histogram based ghost removal in high dynamic range images. In Multimedia and Expo, IEEE Int. Conf. on (2009), IEEE, pp. 530–533. 4, 8, 9
- Min T.H., Park R.H., Chang S.: Noise reduction in high dynamic range images. Signal, Image and Video Processing 5, 3 (2011), 315–328. 4, 8, 9
- Moon Y.S., Tai Y.M., Cha J.H., Lee S.H.: A simple ghostfree exposure fusion for embedded HDR imaging. In Consumer Electronics (ICCE), IEEE Int. Conf. on (2012), IEEE, pp. 9–10. 4, 9
- Malm H., Warrant E.: Motion dependent spatiotemporal smoothing for noise reduction in very dim light image sequences. In Pattern Recognition, 18th Int. Conf. on (2006), vol. 3, IEEE, pp. 954–959. 9
- Oğuz Akyüz A., Genctav A.: A reality check for radiometric camera response recovery algorithms. Computers & Graphics 37, 7 (2013), 935–943. 2
- Oh T.H., Lee J.Y., Kweon I.S.: High dynamic range imaging by a rank1 constraint. In ICIP (2013), pp. 790–794. 4, 10
- Orozco R.R., Martín I., Loscos C., Vasquez P.P.: Full highdynamic range images for dynamic scenes. In SPIE Photonics Europe (2012), Int. Society for Optics and Photonics. 4, 13
- Parzen E.: On estimation of a probability density function and mode. The annals of mathematical statistics (1962), 1065–1076. 9
- Periaswamy S., Farid H.: Elastic registration in the presence of intensity variations. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on 22, 7 (2003), 865–874. 5
- Pedone M., Heikkilä J.: Constrain propagation for ghost removal in high dynamic range images. In VISAPP (2008), pp. 36–41. 4, 6
- Pece F., Kautz J.: Bitmap movement detection: HDR for dynamic scenes. In Visual Media Production (CVMP), Conf. on (2010), IEEE, pp. 1–8. 4, 8, 13
- Park S.C., Oh H.H., Kwon J.H., Choe W., Lee S.D.: Motion artifactfree HDR imaging under dynamic environments. In Image Processing (ICIP), 18th IEEE Int. Conf. on (2011), IEEE, pp. 353–356. 4, 12
- Rosenblatt M., et al.: Remarks on some nonparametric estimates of a density function. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 27, 3 (1956), 832–837. 9
- Robertson M.A., Borman S., Stevenson R.L.: Dynamic range improvement through multiple exposures. In Image Processing, Int. Conf. on (1999), vol. 3, IEEE, pp. 159–163. 2
- Richard M. M. O. B. B., Chang M. Y.S.: Fast digital image inpainting. In Appeared in the Proceedings of the Int. Conf. on Visualization, Imaging and Image Processing (VIIP) (2001), pp. 106–107. 9
- Raman S., Chaudhuri S.: Bottomup segmentation for ghostfree reconstruction of a dynamic scene from multiexposure images. In Proceedings of the Seventh Indian Conf. on Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing (2010), ACM, pp. 56–63. 4, 8, 9
- Raman S., Chaudhuri S.: Reconstruction of high contrast images for dynamic scenes. The Visual Computer 27, 12 (2011), 1099–1114. 4, 9
- Rubinstein M., Gutierrez D., Sorkine O., Shamir A.: A comparative study of image retargeting. ACM Trans. Graph. 29, 6 (2010). 3, 14, 15
- Raman S., Kumar V., Chaudhuri S.: Blind deghosting for automatic multiexposure compositing. In SIGGRAPH ASIA Posters (2009), ACM, p. 44. 4, 8, 9
- Rad A.A., Meylan L., Vandewalle P., Süsstrunk S.: Multidimensional image enhancement from a set of unregistered and differently exposed images. In Electronic Imaging (2007), Int. Society for Optics and Photonics. 4, 5
- Reinhard E., Stark M., Shirley P., Ferwerda J.: Photographic tone reproduction for digital images. ACM Trans. on Graphics 21, 3 (2002), 267–276.
- Reinhard E., Ward G., Pattanaik S., Debevec P.: High Dynamic Range Imaging: Acquisition, Display and ImageBased Lighting, second edition ed. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 2010. 1, 4, 7, 8
- Shirahatti N.V., Barnard K.: Evaluating image retrieval. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, IEEE Computer Society Conf. on (2005), vol. 1, IEEE, pp. 955–961. 3
- Simakov D., Caspi Y., Shechtman E., Irani M.: Summarizing visual data using bidirectional similarity. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, IEEE Conf. on (2008), IEEE, pp. 1–8. 13
- Starks T., David H.: Significance tests for pairedcomparison experiments. Biometrika (1961), 95–108. 17, 18
- Shapiro R. H. L., Haralick R.: Computer and robot vision. Reading: AddisonWesley (1992). 8
- Sen P., Kalantari N.K., Yaesoubi M., Darabi S., Goldman D.B., Shechtman E.: Robust patchbased HDR reconstruction of dynamic scenes. ACM Trans. Graph. 31, 6 (2012), 203. 3, 4, 13, 14, 18, 19
- Silk S., Lang J.: Fast high dynamic range image deghosting for arbitrary scene motion. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface (2012), Canadian Information Processing Society, pp. 85–92. 4, 6, 8, 14, 18, 19, 20
- Sung H.S., Park R.H., Lee D.K., Chang S.: Feature based ghost removal in high dynamic range imaging. Int. Journal of Computer Graphics & Animation 3, 4 (2013). 4, 10
10.5121/ijcga.2013.3403 Google Scholar
- Sidibe D.D., Puech W., Strauss O., et al.: Ghost detection and removal in high dynamic range images. In European Signal Processing Conf. (2009). 4, 6, 13
- Srikantha A., Sidibé D.: Ghost detection and removal for high dynamic range images: Recent advances. Signal Processing: Image Communication 27, 6 (2012), 650–662. 3
- Srikantha A., Sidibé D., Mériaudeau F.: An SVDbased approach for ghost detection and removal in high dynamic range images. In Pattern Recognition (ICPR), 21st Int. Conf. on (2012), IEEE, pp. 380–383. 4, 10
- Sand P., Teller S.: Video matching. ACM Trans. on Graphics 23, 3 (2004), 592–599. 4, 14
- Tursun O.T., Akyuz A.O., Erdem A., Erdem E.: Evaluating deghosting algorithms for HDR images. In Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conf. (SIU), 22nd (2014), IEEE, pp. 1275–1278. 3, 13
- Tombari F., DiStefano L., Mattoccia S.: A robust measure for visual correspondence. In Image Analysis and Processing, 14th Int. Conf. on (2007), IEEE, pp. 376–381. 10
- Tomasi C., Manduchi R.: Bilateral filtering for gray and color images. In Computer Vision, 1998. Sixth Int. Conf. on (1998), IEEE, pp. 839–846. 9
10.1109/ICCV.1998.710815 Google Scholar
- Tomaszewska A., Mantiuk R.: Image registration for multiexposure high dynamic range image acquisition. In 15th Int. Conf. Central Europe on Computer Graphics, Visualization and Computer Vision (2007). 4, 5, 10
- Ward G.: Fast, robust image registration for compositing high dynamic range photographs from handheld exposures. Journal of graphics tools 8, 2 (2003), 17–30. 4, 7, 8, 14, 15
10.1080/10867651.2003.10487583 Google Scholar
- Wang C., Tu C.: An exposure fusion approach without ghost for dynamic scenes. In Image and Signal Processing, 6th Int. Congress on (2013), vol. 2, IEEE, pp. 904–909. 4, 10
- Wu S., Xie S., Rahardja S., Li Z.: A robust and fast antighosting algorithm for high dynamic range imaging. In Image Processing (ICIP), 17th IEEE Int. Conf. on (2010), IEEE, pp. 397–400. 4, 9
- Yao S.: Robust image registration for multiple exposure high dynamic range image synthesis. In IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging (2011), Int. Society for Optics and Photonics. 4, 5
- Yang G.Z., Burger P., Firmin D.N., Underwood S.: Structure adaptive anisotropic image filtering. Image and Vision Computing 14, 2 (1996), 135–145. 9
- Yoo Y., Lee K., Choe W., Park S., Lee S.D., Kim C.Y.: A digital ISO expansion technique for digital cameras. In IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging (2010), Int. Society for Optics and Photonics. 12
- Zimmer H., Bruhn A., Weickert J.: Freehand HDR imaging of moving scenes with simultaneous resolution enhancement. Computer Graphics Forum 30, 2 (2011), 405–414. 3, 4, 11, 12
- Zhang W., Cham W.K.: Gradientdirected composition of multiexposure images. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, IEEE Conf. on (2010), IEEE, pp. 530–536. 4, 6, 10
- Zhang W., Cham W.K.: Gradientdirected multiexposure composition. Image Processing, IEEE Transactions on 21, 4 (2012), 2318–2323. 4, 6, 10
- Zhang W., Cham W.K.: Referenceguided exposure fusion in dynamic scenes. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation 23, 3 (2012), 467–475. 4, 10
- Zheng J., Li Z., Zhu Z., Wu S., Rahardja S.: Patching of moving objects for ghostingfree hdr synthesis. In ACM SIGGRAPH Posters (2012), ACM, p. 62. 4, 13
- Zheng J., Li Z., Zhu Z., Wu S., Rahardja S.: Hybrid patching for a sequence of differently exposed images with moving objects. Image Processing, IEEE Transactions on 22, 12 (2013), 5190–5201. 4, 13
- Zheng J., Li Z., Zhu Z., Rahardja S.: A hybrid patching scheme for high dynamic range imaging. In Asia Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conf. (2011). 4, 12
- Zach C., Pock T., Bischof H.: A duality based approach for realtime TVL 1 optical flow. In Pattern Recognition. Springer, 2007, pp. 214–223. 11
10.1007/978-3-540-74936-3_22 Google Scholar