Volume 54, Issue 1 pp. 77-81
RESEARCH LETTER
Open Access

Multi-omic analysis of Tyrophagus putrescentiae reveals insights into the allergen complexity of storage mites

Angel Tsz-Yau Wan

Angel Tsz-Yau Wan

School of Biomedical Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Hong Kong Bioinformatics Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Search for more papers by this author
Qing Xiong

Qing Xiong

School of Biomedical Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Hong Kong Bioinformatics Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Department of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong

Search for more papers by this author
Xiaojun Xiao

Xiaojun Xiao

Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Allergy and Immunology, School of Medicine, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China

Search for more papers by this author
Kelvin Fu-Kiu Ao

Kelvin Fu-Kiu Ao

School of Biomedical Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Search for more papers by this author
Seok Woo Jang

Seok Woo Jang

Institute of Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Brian Shing-Hei Wong

Brian Shing-Hei Wong

School of Biomedical Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Search for more papers by this author
Mingqiang Wang

Mingqiang Wang

School of Biomedical Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Centre for Microbial Genomics and Proteomics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Search for more papers by this author
Qin Cao

Qin Cao

School of Biomedical Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Search for more papers by this author
Cathy Sin-Hang Fung

Cathy Sin-Hang Fung

School of Biomedical Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Search for more papers by this author
Fook-Tim Chew

Fook-Tim Chew

Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

Search for more papers by this author
Baoqing Sun

Baoqing Sun

State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China

Search for more papers by this author
Sai Ming Ngai

Sai Ming Ngai

School of Life Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Search for more papers by this author
Ting-Fan Leung

Ting-Fan Leung

Department of Paediatrics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Search for more papers by this author
Kyoung Yong Jeong

Kyoung Yong Jeong

Institute of Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Xiaoyu Liu

Corresponding Author

Xiaoyu Liu

Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Allergy and Immunology, School of Medicine, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China

Correspondence

Stephen Kwok-Wing Tsui, School of Biomedical Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

Email: [email protected]

Xiaoyu Liu, Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Allergy and Immunology, School of Medicine, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Stephen Kwok-Wing Tsui

Corresponding Author

Stephen Kwok-Wing Tsui

School of Biomedical Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Hong Kong Bioinformatics Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Centre for Microbial Genomics and Proteomics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Correspondence

Stephen Kwok-Wing Tsui, School of Biomedical Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

Email: [email protected]

Xiaoyu Liu, Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Allergy and Immunology, School of Medicine, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 20 November 2023
Citations: 2

Angel Tsz-Yau Wan, Qing Xiong and Xiaojun Xiao contributed equally to this work.

Summary Box

  • A multi-omic analysis reveals the highly complex allergen profile of Tyrophagus putrescentiae.
  • This comprehensive analysis of Tyrophagus putrescentiae can improve the component-resolved diagnosis of mite allergy.

To the Editor,

Tyrophagus putrescentiae, commonly referred to as the mould mite or cheese mite, is especially well-known as a storage mite that causes human allergic diseases.1 However, it has fewer reported allergen groups compared to the house dust mites of the Dermatophagoides genus in the WHO/IUIS allergen nomenclature database.2, 3

In this omics era, multiple genome-based approaches have been boosting our understanding of the medically important mites.4-6 Using the mite allergens reported in the WHO/IUIS database as reference genes, 37 allergen groups (up to group 42) were predicted in the genome of T. putrescentiae6 and composed an allergen profile encompassing up to 85 predicted genes (Table S1). Unlike the allergen gene expression of D. farinae and D. pteronyssinus,5 the group 1 allergens (cysteine proteases) of T. putrescentiae were expressed at low levels, while the homologue of group 13 allergen, pTyr p 13.0201, exhibited the highest expression level (Figure 1A). To evaluate the IgE-binding reactivity of novel allergens, recombinant proteins were cloned, expressed and assessed by ELISA with T. putrescentiae-sensitized patient sera (Table S2). Five proteins, rTyr p 6.0101, 9.0101, 18.0101, 20.0101 and 26.0101, were suggested to be novel allergens by ELISA experiments with 11.1%, 22.2%, 11.1%, 44.4% and 50.0% positive rates, but with low IgE levels. Additional information about study methods and findings is available in the following repository https://zenodo.org/record/8429480.

Details are in the caption following the image
Multi-omic analysis of T. putrescentiae allergens. (A) The expression levels of all identified allergens in T. putrescentiae were quantified as transcripts per million (TPM) using two transcriptome data of adult mites (TP1 and TP3 of SRR13837414). In the bar chart, the y-axis represents the TPM (Transcripts Per Million) value, while the error bars correspond to the standard deviation. In the lower heatmap, which represents the TPM (Transcripts Per Million) values of TP1 and TP3, the maximum value has been set at 80,000. The transcriptomic reads were unable to differentiate identical genes, such as Tyr p 2.0101 and Tyr p 2.0201, which shared identical protein and coding sequences. Consequently, Tyr p 2.0101 and Tyr p 2.0201 exhibited the same expression level. (B) Phylogenetic analysis of NPC2 family of six astigmatic mites, including two house dust mites, D. farinae and D. pteronyssinus, two parasitic mites, P. ovis and S. scabiei, and two canonical storage mites, B. tropicalis and T. putrescentiae. The NPC2 genes were divided into 8 clusters, that is N1-3 and C1-5. The NPC2 allergens (highlighted in red) include group 2, 22 and 35 of astigmatic mites collected from the WHO/IUIS nomenclature database and Pso o 2 of P. ovis from UniProt database (ID: Q965E2). Tandemly arrayed genes and proximally arrayed genes (separated by no more than 10 genes) were connected by curved solid lines and dotted lines, respectively. Four black triangles marked the four NPC2 genes identified in MS (Table 1). (C) Gene synteny alignment of N1 and N2 Cluster. The black turnover arrow means after reverse complement. (D) T. putrescentiae proteins in two-dimensional (2D) gel electrophoresis. The left panel is a SDS-PAGE image. The Coomassie blue stained 2D gel showed the success of the separation of more than 60 T. putrescentiae proteins. The right panel is a western blotting image. The results of immunoblotting from the 2D gel showed that there were 31 protein spots in the total protein bound by the specific IgE in the patient sera (Table S3), numbered 1–31. All the protein spots could be found correspondingly in the 2D gel.

Group 2 allergens belong to the Niemann-Pick protein type C2 (NPC2) family and are considered the major allergens of storage mites including T. putrescentiae.7, 8 We identified up to six homologues of Tyr p 2, including the two homologous genes (Tyr p 2.0101 and 2.0201) which shared identical sequences, and as high as 99.3% identity with the reported Tyr p 2.

To investigate the NPC2 family, encompassing group 2, 22 and 25 allergens of mites, we gathered the genes of six astigmatic mites. The resultant phylogenetic tree revealed eight distinct clusters, named N1-3 and C1-5 (Figure 1B). All reported allergen genes were in Cluster N1-3, while none of the genes in Cluster C1-5 were reported to be allergens. Cluster N1 contained Blo t 2, Tyr p 2, Lep d 2 and Gly d 2 and Der f 35, as well as Pso o 2 (UniProt ID: Q965E2) of Psoroptes ovis. Cluster N2 covered group 2 allergens of house dust mites including Der f 2, Der p 2 and Eur m 2, while Cluster N3 contained Der f 22. The gene synteny alignment (Figure 1C) suggested that the NPC2 gene of S. scabiei in N1 decayed, while that of B. tropicalis was tandemly duplicated. Cluster N2 is proposed to be unique in psoroptid mites, but decayed in P. ovis, while a 38-aa insertion was identified in the N-terminus of SS_011027.01 in S. scabiei.

Proteomic identification was performed using the pooled sera of allergy patients (Figure 1D). In total, 31 protein spots of T. putrescentiae bound by IgE underwent peptide sequencing by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (Table 1). A range of our identified allergens could be found in the spots, including members of Tyr p 1, 2, 3, 8, 10, 13, 20, 21, 25, 28 and 39. Among them, the best-matched homologues in the spots included Tyr p 2.0101, Tyr p 10.0101, pTyr p 20.0101, pTyr p 21.0101, pTyr p 25.0101, pTyr p 28.0101 and Tyr p 34.0101. PTyr p 21.0101 was matched by four spots, while Tyr p 10.0101, pTyr p 20.0101 and pTyr p 25.0101 were each found in two spots. Some genes were suggested as allergen homologues but shared relatively low identity with the reported allergens, so they were labelled ungroup allergens (Table 1). However, in Tyr p 2, Tyr p 2.0101/Tyr p 2.0201, pTyr p 2.0601 and an ungrouped Tyr p 2 (gene locus: TP_020235.01) were matched. For Tyr p 28, pTyr p 28.0101, pTyr p 28.0201 and an ungrouped Tyr p 28 (gene locus: TP_006940.01) were identified.

TABLE 1. Proteomic results of IgE-bound T. putrescentiae proteins. Within the 31 spots that exhibited IgE-binding activity (Figure 1D), we have successfully identified all the corresponding peptides through mass spectrometry analysis. The list of these identified peptides is provided below.
ID on 2D gel Accession Allergen Protein Score MW (kDa) pI No. of peptides Coverage (%)
1 TP_005966.01 Tyr p 10.0101 Tropomyosin 334.36 33 4.78 6 21.8
2 TP_005966.01 Tyr p 10.0101 Tropomyosin 265.73 33 4.78 4 14.8
6 TP_010799.01 pTyr p 25.0101 Triosephosphate isomerase 674.93 26.8 6.13 6 41.3
8 TP_010799.01 pTyr p 25.0101 Triosephosphate isomerase 610.06 26.8 6.13 6 41.3
TP_007838.01 pTyr p 3.0701 Trypsin 57.33 29.9 7.1 2 7.7
9 TP_004226.01 Sod1 Superoxide dismutase [Cu-Zn] 576.51 15.6 5.92 5 51
10 TP_003565.04 pTyr p 2.0601 NPC2 family 51.72 15.1 6.99 1 7.7
11 TP_003565.04 pTyr p 2.0601 NPC2 family 354.79 15.1 6.99 4 41.5
TP_004226.01 Sod1 Superoxide dismutase [Cu-Zn] 115.71 15.6 5.92 3 23.2
TP_014856.01 Unknown 42.84 24.9 6.93 1 6.2
13 TP_020235.01 Ungrouped Tyr p 2 (44.0%, CAA73221) NPC2 family 60.89 15.6 7.1 2 17.1
15 TP_004518.01 FK506-binding protein 296.13 11.5 6.72 4 40.7
TP_014185.01 pTyr p 21.0101 Unknown 180.4 15.3 7.83 3 30.4
16 TP_014185.01 pTyr p 21.0101 Unknown 538.38 15.3 7.83 6 46.4
17 TP_011560.01 Ungrouped Tyr p 13 (37.4%, AAU11502) Fatty acid-binding protein 392.65 17.5 8.61 5 42.9
TP_003565.02/TP_003567.01 Tyr p 2.0101/Tyr p 2.0201 NPC2 family 184.57 14.8 8.51 2 27.7
18 TP_014185.01 pTyr p 21.0101 Unknown 161.6 15.3 7.83 3 30.2
19 TP_014185.01 pTyr p 21.0101 Unknown 46.76 15.3 7.83 1 10.1
20 TP_004953.01 Unknown 132.75 34.2 9.96 3 17.9
TP_005006.01 Unknown 61.66 34.2 6.9 2 11.5
23 TP_011350.01 pTyr p 28.0201 Heat shock protein 70 267.96 71.5 5.29 4 8.1
TP_011342.01 pTyr p 28.0101 Heat shock protein 70 141.09 122 5.33 3 3.2
TP_006940.01 Ungrouped Tyr p 28 (51.3%, AOD75395) Heat shock protein 70 65.45 74.4 5.64 2 3.8
24 TP_001283.01 Nucleoside diphosphate kinase A1 280.29 23.3 8.32 5 24.2
TP_006307.01 HEXBP DNA-binding protein HEXBP 173.74 14.1 8.26 3 40.8
TP_020843.01 CYPA Peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase 81.44 28.8 10.08 1 5.3
TP_005620.02 Tyr p 34.0101 Troponin C 52.78 17.7 4.04 1 9.8
25 TP_001138.03 pTyr p 20.0101 Arginine kinase 421.42 40.1 6.23 5 21.7
TP_009769.01 FBPA Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase 84.84 38.7 6.55 3 14.3
TP_008599.01 Ungrouped Tyr p 1 (28.2%, ABM53753) Cysteine protease 69.95 39.5 5.9 2 10
26 TP_001138.03 pTyr p 20.0101 Arginine kinase 427.58 40.1 6.23 5 21.7
TP_009769.01 FBPA Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase 71.34 38.7 6.55 2 6.6
29 TP_007523.01 pdi-2 Protein disulfide-isomerase 2 236.42 54.9 4.95 4 10.5
TP_006736.01 ATPsynbeta ATP synthase subunit beta, mitochondrial 99.41 56.1 5.13 3 8.4
31 TP_013474.01 Gpx5 Epididymal secretory glutathione peroxidase 139.51 25.8 7.12 2 9.7
TP_014174.01 Ungrouped Tyr p 8 (50.7%, AGG10560) Glutathione S-transferase 103.13 24.9 8.95 2 12.7
TP_019125.01 Cuticle protein 16.8 87.72 25.6 8.92 1 11.6
  • a These genes were suggested as allergen homologues but shared relatively low identity with the reported allergens so that they were not listed in Figure 1A. The identity percentage and the GenBank accession of the reference allergen were noted in the bracket.

The ungrouped Tyr p 1 (gene locus: TP_008599.01) was identified and shared only 28.2% identity with the reported Tyr p 1 (Table 1). This cysteine protease homologue (gene locus: TP_008599.01) was estimated to be expressed over two hundred times more than the best-matched Tyr p 1.0101 and lower than 50% of that of pTyr p 3.0401 (Figure 1A). Similarly in Tyr p 13, the ungrouped homologue (gene locus: TP_011560.01) was expressed at over 50% higher levels than the highly expressed pTyr p 13.0201. Therefore, we proposed that the gene expression level was a crucial factor in proteomic identification. In addition, an ungrouped homologue of Tyr p 8 (gene locus: TP_014174.01) was identified, but not the in-silico-predicted pTyr p 8.0101 (GenBank accession: AGG10560). Other proteins such as the FK506-binding protein (gene locus: TP_004518.01) were identified in one spot (Table 1). The FK506-binding protein was assessed to be 22.2% and positive in four patient sera. The pooled sera were found to test positive for D. pteronyssinus, while their status for T. putrescentiae remained unknown. This raises concerns about potential cross-reactivity. However, it is important to note that a significant limitation of this study is the absence of immunological investigations of these allergens.

In comparison to previous omics studies focused on T. putrescentiae allergens,9, 10 our research integrates multi-omic data and highlights the presence of multiple allergen homologues in T. putrescentiae genome. Through our multi-omic approaches, a comprehensive allergen profile of T. putrescentiae was revealed and the integrative analysis provides a systematic understanding of the allergen complexity of storage mites.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

ATYW, QX, and XX designed the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. KFKA, SWJ, BSHW, MW, QC, CSHF, SMN performed the experiments and analyzed the data. FTC, BS, TFL and KYJ provided the resources. XL and SKWT supervised the study and revised the manuscript.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We would like to thank the staff members in the Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Allergy for the mite culturing work.

    FUNDING INFORMATION

    This work was made possible by grants: General Research Fund from Research Grants Council of Hong Kong (Reference numbers: 464710, 475113, 14119219, 14119420, 14175617). Health and Medical Research Fund from Food and Health Bureau of Hong Kong (Reference numbers: 06171016, 07181266). Continuation project of Joint Research Fund for Overseas Chinese Scholars and Scholars in Hong Kong and Macao Young Scholars (Reference number: 31729002). National Natural Science Foundation of China (Reference numbers: 81971514, 82073950). Shenzhen Science and Technology Plan Project (Reference number: GJHZ20190822095605512, SGDX20201103095609027).

    CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

    We have no competing interest to disclose.

    IRB STATEMENT

    This study was approved by the institutional review board (IRB no. 4-2013-0397) of Institute of Allergy, College of Medicine, Yonsei University for using the patient sera in ELISA experiments and the hospital ethics committee of The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (reference no. 2017018) for using the pooled patient sera in immunoblotting (western blotting) following the 2D gel electrophoresis.

    DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

    The genome and sequencing data of Tyrophagus putrescentiae are deposited in NCBI database under BioProject accession PRJNA706095. The in-silico-identified allergen sequences were uploaded to NCBI GenBank database under accessions OP558975–OP559059.

      The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.