Volume 42, Issue 3 pp. 245-253
Original Article

Community-based oral health promotion practices targeted at children and adolescents in Finland – developing an assessment tool

Pia Blomqvist

Pia Blomqvist

Department of Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Ellinoora Ojala

Ellinoora Ojala

Department of Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Tarja Kettunen

Tarja Kettunen

Department of Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland

Unit of Primary Health Care, Central Finland Health Care District, Jyväskylä, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Marita Poskiparta

Marita Poskiparta

Department of Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Kirsti Kasila

Corresponding Author

Kirsti Kasila

Department of Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland

Kirsti Kasila, Department of Health Sciences, P.O. Box 35, FI-40014 University of Jyväskylä, Finland

e-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 09 October 2013
Citations: 2

Abstract

Objectives

To develop an assessment tool for evaluating oral health promotion practices and to evaluate community-based oral health promotion practices targeted at children and adolescents with this tool.

Methods

A theoretical framework about health promotion planning, implementation and evaluation was made on the basis of a literature review. Then, information about Finnish community-based oral health promotion practices (n = 12) targeted at children and adolescents was collected using semi-structured interviews. Also, related documents, for example action plans and reports, were collected when available. Next, an assessment tool based on the theoretical framework was developed, and the recorded and transcribed interview data and other documents were evaluated with this tool.

Results

The assessment tool proved to be practical: it pointed out the strengths and weaknesses of the practices. The tool revealed strengths in the implementation and deficiencies in the planning and evaluation of oral health promotion practices. One-quarter of the 12 practices assessed could be considered ‘good practices’.

Conclusions

There is a need to improve the planning and evaluation of oral health promotion practices. The assessment tool developed in this study might be useful for practitioners both in the field of oral health promotion and general health promotion.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.