Volume 162, Issue 4 pp. 455-464
Review

Sickle cell disease: time for a closer look at treatment options?

Sujit Sheth

Corresponding Author

Sujit Sheth

Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA

Correspondence: Sujit Sheth, Professor of Clinical Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, 525 East 68th Street, P – 695, New York, NY 10065, USA.

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Maureen Licursi

Maureen Licursi

Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA

New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Monica Bhatia

Monica Bhatia

Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 15 June 2013
Citations: 41

Summary

Tremendous progress has been made in the care of individuals with sickle cell over the past several decades. Major successes have been comprehensive infection prophylaxis, prediction and prevention of stroke, and better transfusion care, the latter including both prevention of alloimmunization and treatment of iron overload. However, definitive therapies remain limited to hydroxycarbamide (hydroxyurea) and stem cell transplantation, both of which have been in use for at least two decades. Despite knowing the progressive natural history of the disease with organ dysfunction, failure, and ultimately death at a young age, definitive therapies are considered for only a small proportion of individuals. Consequently, while life expectancy has improved dramatically from the last century, the ongoing pace of advancement has slowed or stalled. We believe that it is time to broaden the use of definitive therapy for those with asymptomatic disease, being cautiously more aggressive in our approach.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.