Volume 135, Issue 2 pp. 180-194
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Comparing different postoperative sedation strategies for patients in the intensive care unit after cardiac surgery: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials and network meta-analysis

Qinxue Hu

Qinxue Hu

Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China

Search for more papers by this author
Xing Liu

Xing Liu

The Third Central Clinical College, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China

Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China

Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine Key Laboratory of Luzhou, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China

Search for more papers by this author
Yuancai Xiang

Yuancai Xiang

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China

Search for more papers by this author
Xianying Lei

Xianying Lei

Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China

Search for more papers by this author
Hong Yu

Hong Yu

Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China

Search for more papers by this author
Li Liu

Corresponding Author

Li Liu

Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China

Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine Key Laboratory of Luzhou, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China

Correspondence

Li Liu and Jianguo Feng, Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, Sichuan Province, China.

Email: [email protected] and [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Jianguo Feng

Corresponding Author

Jianguo Feng

Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China

Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine Key Laboratory of Luzhou, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China

Correspondence

Li Liu and Jianguo Feng, Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Hospital, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, Sichuan Province, China.

Email: [email protected] and [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 21 June 2024
Citations: 2

Qinxue Hu and Xing Liu contributed equally in this study.

Abstract

Background

Various postoperative sedation protocols with different anaesthetics lead to profound effects on the outcomes for post-cardiac surgery patients. However, a comprehensive analysis of optimal postoperative sedation strategies for patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) after cardiac surgery is lacking.

Methods

We systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in databases including PubMed and Embase. The primary outcome measured the duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) in the ICU, and the secondary outcome encompassed the length of stay (LOS) in the ICU and hospital and the monitoring adverse events.

Results

The literature included 18 RCTs (1652 patients) with 13 sedation regimens. Dexmedetomidine plus ketamine and sevoflurane were associated with a significantly reduced duration of MV when compared with propofol. Our results also suggested that dexmedetomidine plus ketamine may associated with a shorter LOS in ICU, and sevoflurane associated with a shorter LOS in the hospital, respectively.

Conclusions

The combination of dexmedetomidine and ketamine seems to be a better option for adult patients needing sedation after cardiac surgery, and the incidence of side effects is lower with dexmedetomidine. These findings have potential implications for medication management in the perioperative pharmacotherapy of cardiac surgery patients.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no competing interests.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.