Autism spectrum disorders: linking neuropathological findings to treatment with transcranial magnetic stimulation
Corresponding Author
Manuel F. Casanova
Department of Psychiatry, University of Louisville, Louisville, KA, USA
Correspondence
M F Casanova, MD, Gottfried and Gisela Kolb Endowed Chair in Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, University of Louisville, 500 South Preston Street, Bldg A, Rm 217, Louisville, KY 40202, USA
Tel.: +1(502)852-4077 |
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorEstate Sokhadze
Department of Psychiatry, University of Louisville, Louisville, KA, USA
Search for more papers by this authorIoan Opris
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NA, USA
Search for more papers by this authorYao Wang
Department of Psychiatry, University of Louisville, Louisville, KA, USA
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorXiaoli Li
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Manuel F. Casanova
Department of Psychiatry, University of Louisville, Louisville, KA, USA
Correspondence
M F Casanova, MD, Gottfried and Gisela Kolb Endowed Chair in Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, University of Louisville, 500 South Preston Street, Bldg A, Rm 217, Louisville, KY 40202, USA
Tel.: +1(502)852-4077 |
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorEstate Sokhadze
Department of Psychiatry, University of Louisville, Louisville, KA, USA
Search for more papers by this authorIoan Opris
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NA, USA
Search for more papers by this authorYao Wang
Department of Psychiatry, University of Louisville, Louisville, KA, USA
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorXiaoli Li
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Postmortem studies in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) individuals indicate the presence of abnormalities within the peripheral neuropil space (PNS) of cortical minicolumns. The geometrical orientation of inhibitory elements within the PNS suggests using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to up-regulate their activity. Several rTMS trials in ASD have shown marked improvements in motor symptomatology, attention and perceptual binding.Conclusion: rTMS is the first therapeutic attempt at ASD aimed at correcting some of its core pathology.
Graphical Abstract
References
- 1Kemper TL, Bauman M. Neuropathology of infantile autism. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1998; 57: 645–52.
- 2Bailey A, Luthert PJ, Dean AF, Harding B, Janota I, Montgomery M, et al. A clinicopathological study of autism. Brain 1998; 121: 889–905.
- 3Casanova MF, Buxhoeveden DP, Switala AE, Roy E. Neuronal density and architecture (grey level index) in the brains of ASD patient. J Child Neurol 2002; 17: 515–21.
- 4Casanova MF, Buxhoeveden DP, Switala AE, Roy E. Minicolumnar pathology in autism. Neurology 2002; 58: 428–32.
- 5Casanova MF, Van Kooten IAJ, Switala AE, Van Engeland H, Heinsen H, Steinbusch HWM, et al. Minicolumnar abnormalities in autism. Acta Neuropathol 2006; 112: 287–303.
- 6Casanova MF. The neuropathology of autism. In: FR Volkmar, SJ Rogers, R Paul, KA Pephrey, editors. Handbook of pervasive developmental disorders. 4th ed. New York: Wiley, 2014: 497–531.
- 7Avino TA, Hutsler JJ. Abnormal cell patterning at the cortical gray-white matter boundary in autism spectrum disorders. Brain Res 2010; 1360: 138–46.
- 8Wegiel J, Kuchna I, Nowicki K, Imaki H, Wegiel J, Marchi E, et al. The neuropathology of autism: defects of neurogenesis and neuronal migration, and dysplastic changes. Acta Neuropathol 2010; 119: 755–70.
- 9Casanova MF. The minicolumnopathy of autism. In: J Buxbaum, P Hof, editors. The neuroscience of autism spectrum disorders. Oxford: Academic Press, 2013: 327–33.
- 10Yakovlev PI. Pathoarchitectonic studies of cerebral malformations. III. Arrhinencephalies (Holotelencephalies). J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1959; 18: 22–55.
- 11Sanides F. Functional architecture of motor and sensory cortices in primates in the light of a new concept of neocortex evolution. In: CR Noback, W Motagna, editors. The primate brain. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1970: 137–208.
- 12Jones EG, Powell TP. An anatomical study of converging sensory pathways within the cerebral cortex of the monkey. Brain 1970; 93: 793–820.
- 13Creutzfeldt OD. The neocortical link: thoughts on the generality of structure and function in the neocortex. In: M Brazier, H Ptesche, editors. Architectonics of the cerebral cortex. New York: Raven Press, 1978: 367–84.
- 14Lorente de Nó R. The cerebral cortex: architecture, intracortical connections, and motor projections. In: JF Fulton, editor. Physiology of the nervous system. London: Oxford University Press, 1938: 291–339
- 15Mountcastle VB. Perceptual neuroscience: the cerebral cortex. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998.
- 16Opris I, Fuqua JL, Huettl PF, Gerhardt GA, Berger TW, Hampson RE, et al. Closing the loop in the primate prefrontal cortex: inter-laminar processing. Front Neural Circuits 2012; 6: 88.
- 17Opris I, Casanova MF. Prefrontal cortical minicolumns: from executive control to disrupted cognitive processing. Brain 2014; 137(part 7): 1863–75.
- 18Hampson RE, Gerhardt GA, Marmarelis V, Song D, Opris I, Santos L, et al. Facilitation and restoration of cognitive function in primate prefrontal cortex by a neuroprosthesis that utilizes minicolumn-specific neural firing. J Neural Eng 2012; 9: 056012.
- 19Opris I, Hampson RE, Gerhardt GA, Berger TW, Deadwyler SA. Columnar processing in primate pFC: evidence for executive control microcircuits. J Cogn Neurosci 2012; 24: 2334–7.
- 20Favorov O, Whitsel BL. Spatial organization of the peripheral input to area 1 cell columns: I. The detection of ‘segregates’. Brain Res Rev 1988; 13: 25–42.
- 21Favorov OV, Diamond M. Demonstration of discrete place-defined columns, segregates, in cat SI. J Comp Neurol 1990; 298: 97–112.
- 22Tommerdahl M, Favorov OV, Whitsel BL, Nakhle B, Gonchar YA. Minicolumnar activation patterns in cat and monkey SI cortex. Cereb Cortex 1993; 3: 399–411.
- 23Ohki J, Chung S, Ch′ng YH, Kara P, Reid RC. Functional imaging with cellular resolution reveals precise micro-architecture in visual cortex. Nature 2005; 433: 597–603.
- 24Yu YC, Bultje RS, Wang X, Shi SH. Specific synapses develop preferentially among sister excitatory neurons in the neocortex. Nature 2009; 458: 501–4.
- 25Casanova MF. The significance of minicolumnar size variability in autism. In: AW Zimmerman, editor. Autism: current theories and evidence. Totowa: Humana Press, 2008: 349–60.
- 26Casanova MF, Trippe J, Switala A. A temporal continuity to the vertical organization of the human neocortex. Cereb Cortex 2006; 17: 130–7.
- 27Weidenheim KM, Goodman L, Dickson DW, Gillberg C, Rastman M, Rapin I. Etiology and pathophysiology of autistic behavior: clues from two cases with an unusual variant of neuroaxonal dystrophy. J Child Neurol 2001; 16: 809–19.
- 28Bauman ML, Kemper TL. Neuroanatomic observations of the brain in autism. In: ML Bauman, TL Kemper, editors. The neurobiology of autism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994: 119–45.
- 29Casanova MF, El-Baz AS, Kamat SS, Dombroski BA, Khalifa E, Elnakib A, et al. Focal cortical displasias in autism spectrum disorders. Acta Neuropathol Commun 2013; 1: 67.
- 30Casanova MF, Buxhoeveden D, Gomez J. Disruption in the inhibitory architecture of the cell minicolumn: Implications for autism. Neuroscientist 2003; 9: 496–507.
- 31Szentágothai J, Arbib MA. Conceptual models of neural organization. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1975.
- 32Keita L, Mottron L, Dawson M, Bertrone A. Atypical lateral connectivity: a neural basis for altered visuospatial processing in autism. Biol Psychiatry 2011; 79: 806–11.
- 33Puts NAJ, Wodka EL, Tommerdahl M, Mostofsky SH, Edden RAE. Impaired tactile processing in children with autism spectrum disorder. J Neurophysiol 2014; 111: 1803–11.
- 34Davis G, Plaisted-Grant K. Low endogenous neural noise in autism. Autism 2014; pii: 1362361314552198.
- 35Gerstner W, Kistler W. Spiking neuron models: single neurons, populations, plasticity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
10.1017/CBO9780511815706 Google Scholar
- 36Douglass JK, Wilkens L, Pantazelou E, Moss F. Noise enhancement of information transfer in crayfish mechanoreceptors by stochastic resonance. Nature 1993; 365: 337–40.
- 37Levin JE, Miller JP. Broadband neural encoding in the cricket cercal sensory system enhanced by stochastic resonance. Nature 1996; 380: 165–8.
- 38Caparelli EC, Backus W, Telang F, Wang GJ, Maloney T, Goldstein RZ, et al. Is 1 Hz rTMS always inhibitory in healthy individuals? Open Neuroimag 2012; 6: 69–74.
10.2174/1874440001206010069 Google Scholar
- 39Aydin-Abidin S, Trippe J, Funke K, Eysel UT, Benali A. High- and low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation differentially activates c-Fos and zif268 protein expression in the rat brain. Exp Brain Res 2008; 188: 249–61.
- 40Trippe J, Mix A, Aydin-abidin S, Funke K, Benali A. Theta burst and conventional low-frequency rTMS differentially affect GABAergic neurotransmission in the rat cortex. Exp Brain Res 2009; 199: 411–21.
- 41Ogawa A, Ukai S, Shinosaki K, Yamamoto M, Kawaguchi S, Ishii R, et al. Slow repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation increases somatosensory high-frequency oscillations in humans. Neurosci Lett 2004; 358: 193–6.
- 42Filipović SR, Rothwell JC, Bhatia K. Slow (1 Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) induces a sustained change in cortical excitability in patients with Parkinson's disease. Clin Neurophysiol 2010; 121: 1129–37.
- 43Casula EP, Tarantino V, Basso D, Arcara G, Marino G, Toffolo GM, et al. Low-frequency rTMS inhibitory effects in the primary motor cortex: insights from TMS-evoked potentials. NeuroImage 2014; 98: 225–32.
- 44Hoffman RE, Cavus I. Slow transcranial magnetic stimulation, long-term depotentiation, and brain hyperexcitability disorders. Am J Psychiatry 2002; 159: 1093–102.
- 45Casanova MF, Sokhadze EM. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: application in autism treatment. In: VW Hu, editor. Frontiers in autism research: new horizons for diagnosis and treatment. Hackensack: World Scientific, 2014: 583–606.
10.1142/9789814602167_0023 Google Scholar
- 46Oberman L, Rotenberg A, Pascual-Leone A. Use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord 2015; 45: 524–36.
- 47Sokhadze E, El-Baz A, Baruth J, Mathai G, Sears L, Casanova MF. Effects of low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on gamma frequency oscillations and event-related potentials during processing of illusory figures in autism. J Autism Dev Disord 2009; 39: 619–34.
- 48Basar E. A review of gamma oscillations in healthy subjects and in cognitive impairment. Int J Psychophysiol 2013; 90: 99–117.
- 49Casanova MF, Baruth J, El-Baz AS, Sokhadze GE, Hensley M, Sokhadze ES. Evoked and induced gamma frequency oscillations in autism. In: MF Casanova, AS El-Baz, JS Suri, editors. Imaging the brain in autism. New York: Springer, 2013: 87–106.
10.1007/978-1-4614-6843-1_5 Google Scholar
- 50Casanova MF, Baruth JM, El-Baz A, Tasman A, Sears L, Sokhadze E. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) modulates event-related potential (ERP) indices of attention in autism. Transl Neurosci 2012; 3: 170–80.
- 51Sokhadze E, Baruth J, Tasman A, Sears L, Mathai G, El-Baz A, et al. Event-related potential study of novelty processing abnormalities in autism. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 2009; 34: 37–51.
- 52Sokhadze E, Baruth J, El-Baz A, Horrell T, Sokhadze G, Carroll T, et al. Impaired error monitoring and correction function in autism. J Neurother 2010; 14: 79–95.
- 53Sokhadze EM, Baruth JM, Sears L, Sokhadze GE, El-Baz AS, Casanova MF. Prefrontal neuromodulation using rTMS improves error monitoring and correction function in autism. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 2012; 37: 91–102.
- 54Silver H, Goodman C. Impairment in error monitoring predicts poor executive function in schizophrenia patients. Schizophr Res 2007; 94: 156–63.
- 55Sokahdze EM, El-Baz AS, Sears LL, Opris I, Casanova MF. rTMS neuromodulation improves electrocortical functional measures of information processing and behavioral responses in autism. Front Syst Neurosci 2014; 8: 134.
- 56Hensley MK, El-Baz AS, Sokhadze E, Sears L, Casanova MF. Effects of 18 session TMS therapy on gamma coherence in autism. Psychophysiology 2014; 51: S16.
- 57Sokhadze EM, El-Baz AS, Tasman A, Sears LL, Wang Y, Lamina EV. Neuromodulation integrating rTMS and neurofeedback for the treatment of autism spectrum disorder: an exploratory study. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback 2014; 39: 237–57.
- 58Casanova MF, Hensley MK, Sokhadze EM, El-Baz AS, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Effects of rTMS on autonomic functions in autism spectrum disorder. Front Hum Neurosci 2014; 8: 851.
- 59Fecteau S, Agosta S, Oberman L, Pascual-Leone A. Brain stimulation over Broca's area differentially modulates naming skills in neurotypical adults and individuals with Asperger's syndrome. Eur J Neurosci 2011; 34: 158–64.
- 60Enticott PG, Rinehart NJ, Tonge BJ, Bradshaw JL, Fitzgerald PB. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) improves movement-related cortical potentials in autism spectrum disorders. Brain Stimul 2012; 5: 30–7.