Volume 41, Issue 11 pp. 1026-1034
Main Text Article

Effects of Orthostatism and Hemodialysis on Mean Heart Period and Fractal Heart Rate Properties of Chronic Renal Failure Patients

Juan C. Echeverría

Juan C. Echeverría

Departamento de Ingeniería Eléctrica, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Unidad Iztapalapa, Iztapalapa

Search for more papers by this author
Oscar Infante

Oscar Infante

Departamento de Instrumentación Electromecánica, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez, Tlalpan

Search for more papers by this author
Héctor Pérez-Grovas

Héctor Pérez-Grovas

Departamento de Nefrología, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez, Tlalpan

Search for more papers by this author
Hortensia González

Hortensia González

Laboratorio de Biofísica de Sistemas Excitables, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Coyoacán

Search for more papers by this author
Marco V. José

Marco V. José

Theoretical Biology Group, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, México

Search for more papers by this author
Claudia Lerma

Corresponding Author

Claudia Lerma

Departamento de Instrumentación Electromecánica, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez, Tlalpan

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Claudia Lerma, Ph.D., Departamento de Instrumentación Electromecánica, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez, Juan Badiano 1, Sección 16, Tlalpan D.F. 14080, México. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 26 May 2017
Citations: 11

Abstract

The aim of this work was to evaluate the short-term fractal index (α1) of heart rate variability (HRV) in chronic renal failure (CRF) patients by identifying the effects of orthostatism and hemodialysis (HD), and by evaluating the correlation between α1 and the mean RR interval from sinus beats (meanNN). HRV time series were derived from ECG data of 19 CRF patients and 20 age-matched healthy subjects obtained at supine and orthostatic positions (lasting 5 min each). Data from CRF patients were collected before and after HD. α1 was calculated from each time series and compared by analysis of variance. Pearson's correlations between meanNN and α1 were calculated using the data from both positions by considering three groups: healthy subjects, CRF before HD and CRF after HD. At supine position, α1 of CRF patients after HD (1.17 ± 0.30) was larger (P < 0.05) than in healthy subjects (0.89 ± 0.28) but not before HD (1.10 ± 0.34). α1 increased (P < 0.05) in response to orthostatism in healthy subjects (1.29 ± 0.26) and CRF patients after HD (1.34 ± 0.31), but not before HD (1.25 ± 0.37). Whereas α1 was correlated (P < 0.05) with the meanNN of healthy subjects (r = −0.562) and CRF patients after HD (r = −0.388), no significance in CRF patients before HD was identified (r = 0.003). Multiple regression analysis confirmed that α1 was mainly predicted by the orthostatic position (in all groups) and meanNN (healthy subjects and patients after HD), showing no association with the renal disease condition in itself. In conclusion, as in healthy subjects, α1 of CRF patients correlates with meanNN after HD (indicating a more irregular-like HRV behavior at slower heart rates). This suggests that CRF patients with stable blood pressure preserve a regulatory adaptability despite a shifted setting point of the heart period (i.e., higher heart rate) in comparison with healthy subjects.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.