Breast cancer related lymphoedema: a review of contemporary preventive strategies
Corresponding Author
Saam S. Tourani MD, PhD, FRACS, CCPU
Northern Clinical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Correspondence
Saam S. Tourani, 66 Waverley Rd Chadstone, 3148, VIC, Australia.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Saam S. Tourani MD, PhD, FRACS, CCPU
Northern Clinical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Correspondence
Saam S. Tourani, 66 Waverley Rd Chadstone, 3148, VIC, Australia.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Secondary lymphoedema remains an incurable long-term complication of breast cancer treatment. Prevention is our best chance against this debilitating condition. Strategies for selective de-escalation of oncological therapies have continued to evolve over the last few decades to reduce the incidence of this feared complication. In this manuscript we first review the current strategies in de-escalation of axillary treatment. We then review the current evidence for immediate lymphatic reconstruction in those high-risk patients who cannot be spared from more aggressive axillary management.
Conflict of interest
None declared.
References
- 1Hayes SC. Review of research evidence on secondary lymphoedema: incidence, prevention, risk factors and treatment. National Breast and Ovarian Cancer Centre: NSW, Australia. 2008.
- 2Tsai RJ, Dennis LK, Lynch CF, Snetselaar LG, Zamba GKD, Scott-Conner C. The risk of developing arm lymphedema among breast cancer survivors: a meta-analysis of treatment factors. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2009; 16: 1959–1972.
- 3Giuliano AE, Kirgan DM, Guenther JM, Morton DL. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Ann. Surg. 1994; 220: 391–398 discussion 398–401.
- 4Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB et al. Sentinel-lymph-node resection compared with conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer: overall survival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010; 11: 927–933.
- 5Mansel RE, Fallowfield L, Kissin M et al. Randomized multicenter trial of sentinel node biopsy versus standard axillary treatment in operable breast cancer: the ALMANAC trial. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2006; 98: 599–609.
- 6Galimberti V, Zurrida S, Intra M et al. Sentinel node biopsy interpretation: the Milan experience. Breast J. 2000; 6: 306–309.
- 7Galimberti V, Cole BF, Zurrida S et al. Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with sentinel-node micrometastases (IBCSG 23-01): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013; 14: 297–305.
- 8Sola M, Alberro JA, Fraile M et al. Complete axillary lymph node dissection versus clinical follow-up in breast cancer patients with sentinel node micrometastasis: final results from the multicenter clinical trial AATRM 048/13/2000. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2013; 20: 120–127.
- 9Hunt KK, Ballman KV, McCall LM et al. Factors associated with local-regional recurrence after a negative sentinel node dissection: results of the ACOSOG Z0010 trial. Ann. Surg. 2012; 256: 428–436.
- 10Giuliano AE, Ballman KV, McCall L et al. Effect of axillary dissection vs No axillary dissection on 10-year overall survival among women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: the ACOSOG Z0011 (Alliance) randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2017; 318: 918–926.
- 11Tinterri C, Gentile D, Gatzemeier W et al. Preservation of axillary lymph nodes compared with complete dissection in T1-2 breast cancer patients presenting one or two metastatic sentinel lymph nodes: the SINODAR-ONE multicenter randomized clinical trial. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2022; 29: 5732–5744.
- 12Donker M, van Tienhoven G, Straver ME et al. Radiotherapy or surgery of the axilla after a positive sentinel node in breast cancer (EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014; 15: 1303–1310.
- 13Savolt A, Péley G, Polgár C et al. Eight-year follow up result of the OTOASOR trial: the optimal treatment of the axilla – surgery or radiotherapy after positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer: a randomized, single centre, phase III, non-inferiority trial. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2017; 43: 672–679.
- 14Bartels SAL, Donker M, Poncet C et al. Radiotherapy or surgery of the axilla after a positive sentinel node in breast cancer: 10-year results of the randomized controlled EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2023; 41: 2159–2165.
- 15Boughey JC, McCall LM, Ballman KV et al. Tumor biology correlates with rates of breast-conserving surgery and pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: findings from the ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) prospective multicenter clinical trial. Ann. Surg. 2014; 260: 608–614 discussion 614–6, 616.
- 16Boughey JC, Suman VJ, Mittendorf EA et al. Sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with node-positive breast cancer: the ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) clinical trial. JAMA 2013; 310: 1455–1461.
- 17Kuehn T, Bauerfeind I, Fehm T et al. Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy in patients with breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SENTINA): a prospective, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2013; 14: 609–618.
- 18Boileau JF, Poirier B, Basik M et al. Sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in biopsy-proven node-positive breast cancer: the SN FNAC study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2015; 33: 258–264.
- 19Caudle AS, Yang WT, Krishnamurthy S et al. Improved axillary evaluation following Neoadjuvant therapy for patients with node-positive breast cancer using selective evaluation of clipped nodes: implementation of targeted axillary dissection. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016; 34: 1072–1078.
- 20Caudle AS, Kuerer HM, le-Petross HT et al. Predicting the extent of nodal disease in early-stage breast cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2014; 21: 3440–3447.
- 21Crown A, Sevilimedu V, Morrow M. Palpable adenopathy does not indicate high-volume axillary nodal disease in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2021; 28: 6060–6068.
- 22Ahmed M, Jozsa F, Baker R, Rubio IT, Benson J, Douek M. Meta-analysis of tumour burden in pre-operative axillary ultrasound positive and negative breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2017; 166: 329–336.
- 23Garg PK, Deo SVS, Kumar R et al. Staging PET-CT scanning provides superior detection of lymph nodes and distant metastases than traditional imaging in locally advanced breast cancer. World J. Surg. 2016; 40: 2036–2042.
- 24Riegger C, Koeninger A, Hartung V et al. Comparison of the diagnostic value of FDG-PET/CT and axillary ultrasound for the detection of lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients. Acta Radiol. 2012; 53: 1092–1098.
- 25Henke G, Knauer M, Ribi K et al. Tailored axillary surgery with or without axillary lymph node dissection followed by radiotherapy in patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer (TAXIS): study protocol for a multicenter, randomized phase-III trial. Trials 2018; 19: 667.
- 26Johnston SRD, Toi M, O'Shaughnessy J et al. Abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-positive, high-risk early breast cancer (monarchE): results from a preplanned interim analysis of a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2023; 24: 77–90.
- 27Giuliano AE. Axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection in women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2011; 305: 569.
- 28Fisher B. Ten-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing radical mastectomy and total mastectomy with or without radiation. N. Engl. J. Med. 1985; 312: 674–681.
- 29Williams AD, Ruth K, Shaikh SS et al. Should patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer and one or two positive sentinel nodes undergo axillary dissection to determine candidacy for adjuvant abemaciclib? Cancer 2024; 130: 1052–1060.
- 30Gaillard T, Piketty J, Feron JG et al. Rethinking surgical revisions: impact of the MonarchE trial on axillary dissection in hormone-positive HER2-negative early breast cancer patients potentially eligible for abemaciclib. Br. J. Cancer 2024; 130: 1141–1148.
- 31Curigliano G, Burstein HJ, Gnant M et al. Understanding breast cancer complexity to improve patient outcomes: the St Gallen International Consensus Conference for the Primary Therapy of Individuals with Early Breast Cancer 2023. Ann. Oncol 2023; 34: 970–986.
- 32Kalinsky K, Barlow WE, Gralow JR et al. 21-gene assay to inform chemotherapy benefit in node-positive breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021; 385: 2336–2347.
- 33Mittendorf EA, King TA, Tolaney SM. Impact of RxPONDER and monarchE on the surgical Management of the Axilla in patients with breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2022; 40: 3361–3364.
- 34Mamounas E. GS2-07: loco-regional irradiation in patients with biopsy-proven axillary node involvement at presentation who become pathologically node-negative after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: primary outcomes of NRG Oncology/NSABP B-51/RTOG 1304. in St Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium. HENRY B. Gonzalez Convention Center, San Antonio, Texas; 2023.
- 35 NCT01872975: Standard or comprehensive radiation therapy in treating patients with early-stage breast cancer previously treated with chemotherapy and surgery. [Cited 27 Sept 2019.] Available from URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01872975.
- 36NCT01901094: Comparison of axillary lymph node dissection with axillary radiation for patients with node-positive breast cancer treated with chemotherapy. [Cited 27 Sept 2019.] Available from URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01901094
- 37Parulekar WR, Berrang T, Kong I et al. Cctg MA.39 tailor RT: a randomized trial of regional radiotherapy in biomarker low-risk node-positive breast cancer (NCT03488693). J. Clin. Oncol. 2019; 37: TPS602.
- 38Thompson M, Korourian S, Henry-Tillman R et al. Axillary reverse mapping (ARM): a new concept to identify and enhance lymphatic preservation. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2007; 14: 1890–1895.
- 39Ponzone R, Mininanni P, Cassina E, Sismondi P. Axillary reverse mapping in breast cancer: can we spare what we find? Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2008; 15: 390–391 author reply 392-3.
- 40Saam Tourani JB, Whitfield R, Tiong L, Bochner M. Axillary reverse mapping in axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer; a systematic review. In Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) Annual Scientific Congress. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; 2021.
- 41Boccardo F, Casabona F, DeCian F et al. Lymphatic microsurgical preventing healing approach (LYMPHA) for primary surgical prevention of breast cancer-related lymphedema: over 4 years follow-up. Microsurgery 2014; 34: 421–424.
- 42Jorgensen MG, Toyserkani NM, Sorensen JA. The effect of prophylactic lymphovenous anastomosis and shunts for preventing cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Microsurgery 2018; 38: 576–585.
- 43Hill WKF, Deban M, Platt A, Rojas-Garcia P, Jost E, Temple-Oberle C. Immediate lymphatic reconstruction during axillary node dissection for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob. Open 2022; 10: e4291.
- 44Boccardo FM, Casabona F, Friedman D et al. Surgical prevention of arm lymphedema after breast cancer treatment. Ann. Surg. Oncol 2011; 18: 2500–2505 (1534–4681 (Electronic)).
- 45Coriddi M, Mehrara B, Skoracki R, Singhal D, Dayan JH. Immediate lymphatic reconstruction: technical points and literature review. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob. Open 2021; 9: e3431.
- 46Squitieri L, Rasmussen PW, Patel KM. An economic analysis of prophylactic lymphovenous anastomosis among breast cancer patients receiving mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection. J. Surg. Oncol. 2020; 121: 1175–1178.
- 47Johnson AR, Asban A, Granoff MD et al. Is immediate lymphatic reconstruction cost-effective? Ann. Surg. 2021; 274: e581–e588.
- 48Jakub JA-O, Boughey JC, Hieken TJ et al. Lymphedema rates following axillary lymph node dissection with and without immediate lymphatic reconstruction: a prospective trial. Ann. Surg. Oncol 2024; 31: 7349–7359 (1534–4681 (Electronic)).
- 49Coriddi M, Dayan J, Bloomfield E et al. Efficacy of immediate lymphatic reconstruction to decrease incidence of breast cancer-related lymphedema: preliminary results of randomized controlled trial. Ann. Surg. 2023; 278: 630–637.
- 50Rockson SG. Precipitating factors in lymphedema: myths and realities. Cancer 1998; 83: 2814–2816.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19981215)83:12B+<2814::AID-CNCR31>3.0.CO;2-E CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 51Mellor RH, Stanton AWB, Azarbod P, Sherman MD, Levick JR, Mortimer PS. Enhanced cutaneous lymphatic network in the forearms of women with postmastectomy oedema. J. Vasc. Res. 2000; 37: 501–512.
- 52Ferrell RE, Kimak MA, Lawrence EC, Finegold DN. Candidate gene analysis in primary lymphedema. Lymphat. Res. Biol. 2008; 6: 69–76.
- 53Finegold DN, Baty CJ, Knickelbein KZ et al. Connexin 47 mutations increase risk for secondary lymphedema following breast cancer treatment. Clin. Cancer Res. 2012; 18: 2382–2390.
- 54Granoff MD, Pardo JA, Johnson AR et al. Superficial and functional lymphatic anatomy of the upper extremity. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2022; 150: 900–907.
- 55Campisi C, Boccardo F, Lavagno R, Larcher L, Campisi CA, Amore M. Lymphatic drainage of mammary gland and upper extremities: from anatomy to surgery to microsurgery. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2012; 215: S124–S125.
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.06.324 Google Scholar
- 56Pissas A, Rzal K, Math ML, el Nasser M, Dubois JB. Prevention of secondary lymphedema. Ann. Ital. Chir. 2002; 73: 489–492.