Volume 94, Issue 7-8 pp. 1299-1304
Colorectal Surgery

First worldwide report on rectal resections with Hugo™ surgical system: description of docking angles and tips for an effective setup

Damiano Caputo MD, FACS

Damiano Caputo MD, FACS

Department of Medicine and Surgery and Research Unit of General Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico, Roma, Italy

Operative Research Unit of General Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Roma, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Roberto Cammarata MD

Roberto Cammarata MD

Operative Research Unit of General Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Roma, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Tommaso Farolfi MD

Corresponding Author

Tommaso Farolfi MD

Operative Research Unit of General Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Roma, Italy

Correspondence

Dr Tommaso Farolfi, Operative Research Unit of General Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus, Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200 – 00128 Roma, Italy.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Roberto Coppola MD, FACS

Roberto Coppola MD, FACS

Operative Research Unit of General Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Roma, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Vincenzo La Vaccara PhD, FACS

Vincenzo La Vaccara PhD, FACS

Operative Research Unit of General Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Roma, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 30 March 2024
Citations: 12
D. Caputo MD, FACS; R. Cammarata MD; T. Farolfi MD; R. Coppola MD, FACS; V. La Vaccara PhD, FACS.

Abstract

Backgrounds

Rectal robotic surgery gained momentum in the last decade, but it is still associated with not-negligible costs. In order to reduce costs, recently different robotic systems have received approval for clinical use. This study aims to present the first case series of rectal resection with the novel cost-effective platform Robotic Assisted Surgery (RAS) Hugo™. Tips for effective set up of the system and detailed configuration of tilt and docking angles are also provided.

Methods

Three cases of rectal resection with Hugo RAS™ system are reported. After the first two cases of resection with partial mesorectal excision in which surgeries were performed with the setup proposed by the vendor company, in the third case we tested a novel setup that allowed a full robotic low rectal resection performing vascular ligations, TME and colonic splenic flexure mobilization without the need of any de-docking.

Results

Our first three robotic rectal resections with the Hugo RAS™ system were completed without complications with a median docking time of 12 min (range 8–15) and a median console time of 345 minutes (range 271–475). In the first two cases, hybrid robotic and laparoscopic surgeries were performed to obtain an adequate haemostasis and traction during the pelvic phase. In the third case, a full robotic TME was successfully accomplished.

Conclusion

Our experience demonstrates that a full robotic low rectal resection with TME with Hugo™ RAS system is feasible, safe and associated with satisfactory postoperative outcomes.

Conflict of interest

None declared.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.