Volume 92, Issue 9 pp. 2109-2114
UPPER GUT

Gastrectomy mortality in Australia

Sean S. Davis MBBS, MSurg

Sean S. Davis MBBS, MSurg

Discipline of Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Australia and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality, Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Contribution: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Darcy Noll MBBS

Darcy Noll MBBS

Australia and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality, Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Contribution: Data curation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Prajay Patel MBBS

Prajay Patel MBBS

Australia and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality, Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Contribution: Conceptualization, Data curation

Search for more papers by this author
Ryan T. Maloney PhD

Ryan T. Maloney PhD

Australia and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality, Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Contribution: Data curation, Formal analysis, Software, Validation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Guy J. Maddern MBBS, PhD, FRACS

Corresponding Author

Guy J. Maddern MBBS, PhD, FRACS

Discipline of Surgery, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Australia and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality, Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Correspondence

Professor Guy J. Maddern, Australia and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality, Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, 199 Ward St, Adelaide, SA 5006, Australia. Email: [email protected]

Contribution: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 18 February 2022
Citations: 2
S. S. Davis MBBS, MSurg; D. Noll MBBS; P. Patel MBBS; R. T. Maloney PhD; G. J. Maddern MBBS, PhD, FRACS.

Abstract

Background

Despite advances in medical management and endoscopic therapy, gastrectomy remains an important yet high-risk procedure for a range of benign and malignant upper gastrointestinal pathologies. No study has previously analysed Australian gastrectomy perioperative mortality rate (POMR). This retrospective, population-based cohort study was conducted to determine the Australian national gastrectomy POMR, allowing state-based and regional trends and outcomes to be assessed.

Methods

Logistic regression models were compared using de-identified procedural data between 1 July 2005 and 30 June 2017 from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Codes relating to total and subtotal gastrectomy contained in the Australian Classification of Health Interventions were used to extract patient data. Mortality rates were risk adjusted for age and gender. Temporal trends and differences between states/territories and regions were investigated.

Results

The national average POMR throughout the study period was 2.1%. For subtotal gastrectomy, the national mean POMR was 1.1%, decreasing from 2.7% (2005) to 1.3% (2017). For total gastrectomy, the national mean POMR was 2.8%, decreasing from 3.3% (2005) to 1.7% (2017). POMR significantly reduced over time without variation between states or regions. Procedure volume steadily reduced in rural centres with a concomitant increase in metropolitan centres over time.

Conclusion

Pleasingly, the Australian gastrectomy POMR is favourable when compared to international cohorts. Improved outcomes were consistent between states and territories, and metropolitan and regional centres. Progressive metropolitan centralization of gastrectomy was demonstrated without evidence of improved outcomes.

Conflict of interest

None declared.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.