Volume 22, Issue 2 e12430
REVIEW ARTICLE
Free to Read

Arrhythmic risk stratification in heart failure: Time for the next step?

Konstantinos A. Gatzoulis MD

Corresponding Author

Konstantinos A. Gatzoulis MD

Electrophysiology Laboratory, First Department of Cardiology, “Hippokration” General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece

Correspondence

Konstantinos A. Gatzoulis, Electrophysiology Laboratory, First Department of Cardiology, “Hippokration” General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Antonios Sideris MD

Antonios Sideris MD

Second Department of Cardiology, Laboratory of Cardiac Electrophysiology, “Evangelismos” General Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece

Search for more papers by this author
Emmanuel Kanoupakis MD

Emmanuel Kanoupakis MD

Department of Cardiology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece

Search for more papers by this author
Skevos Sideris MD

Skevos Sideris MD

State Department of Cardiology, “Hippokration” General Hospital, Athens, Greece

Search for more papers by this author
Nikolaos Nikolaou MD

Nikolaos Nikolaou MD

Department of Cardiology, “Konstantopouleio” General Hospital, Athens, Greece

Search for more papers by this author
Christos-Konstantinos Antoniou MD

Christos-Konstantinos Antoniou MD

Electrophysiology Laboratory, First Department of Cardiology, “Hippokration” General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece

Search for more papers by this author
Theofilos M. Kolettis MD

Theofilos M. Kolettis MD

Department of Cardiology, University General Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 03 February 2017
Citations: 21

Abstract

Background

Primary prevention of sudden cardiac death by means of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators constitutes the holy grail of arrhythmology. However, current risk stratification algorithms lead to suboptimal outcomes, by both allocating ICDs to patients not deriving any meaningful survival benefit and withholding them from those erroneously considered as low-risk for arrhythmic mortality.

Methods

In the present review article we will attempt to present shortcomings of contemporary guidelines regarding sudden death prevention in ischemic and dilated cardiomyopathy patients and present available data suggesting encouraging results following implementation of multifactorial approaches, by using multiple modalities, both noninvasive and invasive. Invasive electrophysiological testing, namely programmed ventricular stimulation, will be discussed in greater length to highlight both its potential usefulness and currently ongoing multicenter studies aiming to provide evidence necessary to make the next step in sudden death risk stratification.

Results

Promising findings have been reported by multiple study groups regarding novel strategies for both negative selection of low and positive selection of relatively preserved ejection fraction patients as candidates for ICD implantation.

Conclusions

The era of ejection fraction as the sole risk stratifier for arrhythmic risk in heart failure appears to be drawing to an end, especially if current underway large studies validate previous findings.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.