Volume 144, Issue 3 pp. 303-311
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Supervised exercises versus telerehabilitation. Benefits for persons with multiple sclerosis

Ela Tarakci

Corresponding Author

Ela Tarakci

Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul University Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey

Correspondence

Ela Tarakci, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul University Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Devrim Tarakci

Devrim Tarakci

Department of Ergotherapy, School of Health Sciences, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey

Search for more papers by this author
Farzin Hajebrahimi

Farzin Hajebrahimi

Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, School of Health Sciences, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey

Search for more papers by this author
Miray Budak

Miray Budak

Department of Ergotherapy, School of Health Sciences, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 07 May 2021
Citations: 31

Trial Registration: This study is registered in clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04413682)

Funding information

The First Author, Ela Tarakci was awarded and received individual funding from Turkish Academy of Sciences as the winner of the Young Scientists Award Program (GEBIP) 2018

Abstract

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of structured telerehabilitation on fatigue, health status, quality of life (QoL), and activities of daily living (ADL) and compare the possible effects with structured supervised exercise programs in patients with Multiple Sclerosis.

Materials and methods

This study was a randomized, single-blind trial. Thirty patients with relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis were included in the study and randomly divided into two groups; structured supervised exercise group (Group 1) and telerehabilitation group (Group 2). Group 1 (n = 15) completed a 12 week structured supervised exercise program. Group 2 (n = 15) completed a 12 week structured home-based exercise program. Patients were evaluated with functional independence measure (FIM), first section of Nottingham Health Profile (NHP-I), fatigue severity scale (FSS), and quality of life scale (QoLS) before and after the intervention.

Results

Significant differences were found in all parameters in both groups after the treatment (p < .05). No significant difference was found between groups regarding FIM-total, FIM-motor, FIM-cognitive, NHP sub-parameters, and QoLS (p > .05). Between-group differences revealed a significant difference in FSS and NHP total in favor of Group 1 (p < .05).

Conclusion

A structured home-based exercise program can be an alternative to supervised exercises with no side effects in patients with multiple sclerosis. Home-based rehabilitation exercises that are checked and controlled through telerehabilitation can help patients improve their health-related QoL and ADL. However, supervised exercises can be more beneficial regarding the fatigue and health profile compared to the home-based exercises.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data available on request due to privacy/ethical restrictions.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.