Volume 136, Issue 2 pp. 151-154
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Quality-of-life perception by Parkinson's disease patients and caregivers

Y. Balash

Corresponding Author

Y. Balash

Movement Disorders Unit, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel

Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

Correspondence

Yacov Balash, Movement Disorders Unit, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
A. D. Korczyn

A. D. Korczyn

Movement Disorders Unit, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel

Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

Search for more papers by this author
J. Knaani

J. Knaani

Movement Disorders Unit, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel

Search for more papers by this author
A. A. Migirov

A. A. Migirov

Movement Disorders Unit, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel

Search for more papers by this author
T. Gurevich

T. Gurevich

Movement Disorders Unit, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel

Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 12 January 2017
Citations: 19

Abstract

Background

The quality-of-life (QoL) perception by Parkinson's disease (PD) patients and their caregivers (CG) has not been studied in depth.

Objective

To examine patient/proxy agreements on the PD QoL Questionnaire (PDQ-39), the Scale of Quality of Life of Care-Givers (SQLC) and the Multidimensional Caregiver Strain Index (MCSI).

Methods

Patients with PD and their CG completed the above-mentioned questionnaires about themselves and each other. The intraclass correlations between their scores (paired t test) were compared.

Results

Twelve patient-CG pairs were studied. Agreements for QoL items were strong and comparable for the total scores of the PDQ-39, SQLC and MCSI questionnaires (75.4% ± 14%; 78.1% ± 14.1% and 78.2% ± 14.3%, respectively). Agreements ranged from moderate to strong (0.57-0.88, P≤.05) for the patients’ physical condition (PDQ-39 items 3, 5, 6, 8, 12-15, 23, 24, 35), mental concentration (item 31) and depression (item 17). Disagreements were apparent in 20%-25% of the pairs and were particularly significant for PDQ-39 items #33 and #25 (embarrassment of patients in public and distressing dreams or hallucinations), in which the CG gave higher scores than the patients.

Conclusions

Agreements between patients with PD and CG were generally good for most, but not all, of the PDQ-39, SQLC and MCSI domains.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.