Volume 131, Issue 1 pp. 9-16
Original Article

Drug-resistant MS spasticity treatment with Sativex® add-on and driving ability

M. Freidel

M. Freidel

NTD Study Group, NeuroPraxis – MS-Zentrum, Kaltenkirchen/Holstein, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
K. Tiel-Wilck

K. Tiel-Wilck

NTD Study Group, NeuroTransData GmbH, Berlin, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
H. Schreiber

H. Schreiber

NTD Study Group, NeuroPoint Studienzentrum, Ulm, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
A. Prechtl

A. Prechtl

Almirall Hermal GmbH, Reinbek, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
U. Essner

Corresponding Author

U. Essner

O. MEANY Consultancy GmbH, Hamburg, Germany

U. Essner, O. MEANY Consultancy, Ohkamp 26, 22339 Hamburg, Germany

Tel.: +40 5000 383

e-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
M. Lang

M. Lang

NTD Study Group, NeuroPoint Studienzentrum, Ulm, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 September 2014
Citations: 27

Abstract

Objective

The aim of the present observational study was to determine the effects of a delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) oromucosal spray (Sativex® spray), brand name Sativex®, indicated for drug-resistant MS spasticity, on the driving ability of treated MS patients.

Methods

The study was conducted over a period of 4–6 weeks. Thirty-three MS patients with moderate to severe treatment-resistant spasticity and planned to begin add-on treatment with Sativex® were enrolled at three specialized MS centres in Germany. A set of five driving test procedures from a validated computerized test battery was used to evaluate the driving ability of eligible patients. Tests were performed by patients at baseline and repeated after 4–6 weeks of treatment with Sativex® oromucosal spray. According to German normative data, the test thresholds achieved by the general population served as a reference to allow for a fitness/unfitness to drive classification.

Results

Patients showed comparable driving test results at baseline and at final visits. Only two patients changed classification shifting from ‘unfit’ to drive to ‘fit’ and vice versa. The mean severity of spasticity, as self-reported by the patients, improved with statistical significance. Sativex® was generally well tolerated.

Conclusions

Treatment of MS patients with Sativex® does not negatively impact on driving ability and may improve moderate to severe treatment-resistant MS spasticity.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.