Volume 29, Issue 3 pp. 435-448
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Effects of a family dyadic partnership program for people with hypertension in a rural community: A pilot randomised controlled trial

Dejian Zeng MSN

Corresponding Author

Dejian Zeng MSN

The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China

Correspondence

Dejian Zeng, The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, 6/F, Esther Lee Building, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong SAR, China.

Email: [email protected]

Contribution: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, ​Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing - original draft

Search for more papers by this author
Chen Yang MSN

Chen Yang MSN

The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China

Contribution: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Wai Tong Chien PhD

Wai Tong Chien PhD

The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China

Contribution: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 04 July 2021
Citations: 2

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of a theory-based patient-family carer partnership intervention for people with hypertension in a Chinese rural community.

Design

A pilot randomised controlled trial using pretest and post-test design.

Setting

Rural China

Participants

Forty-four hypertensive patients and their family carers (family dyads) were randomly recruited from a village clinic located in China between November 2019 and January 2020.

Interventions

Participants were randomised to either an intervention group receiving a five-session patient-family carer partnership intervention over 10 weeks or a control group receiving usual care.

Main outcome measures

The feasibility and acceptability of patient-family carer partnership intervention and the changes in patients' systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and percentage of normal controlled blood pressure.

Results

The patient-family carer partnership intervention was a feasible and acceptable program with high recruitment (81.5%) and completion rates (95.5%) and positive feedback from participants. Greater improvement in the percentage of normal controlled blood pressure was identified in the intervention group tested by the χ2 tests, with P = .03. Two-way ANOVA results indicated its interaction (Group × Time) effects on patients' systolic blood pressure (P < .001), diastolic blood pressure (P < .001), dyadic partnership quality (P = .002), self-care (P < .001), self-efficacy (P = .02), antihypertensive drug treatment rate (P = .02), prescription adjustment (P = .03), perceived anxiety (P < .001) and health-related quality of life (EuroQol five-dimensional five-level: P = .02; EuroQol visual analogue scale: P < .001); family carers' dyadic partnership quality (P = .002), perceived depression (P = .04) and health-related quality of life (P = .02) were significant.

Conclusion

Our findings support the feasibility and acceptability of the patient-family carer partnership intervention and indicate benefits in improving patients' blood pressure control, dyadic relationship and psychological well-being of family dyads in rural area. Further research to test the longer-term effect in a large-sized population is recommended.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.