Performing Accountability During a Crisis: Insights from the Italian Government's Response to the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic
Ileana Steccolini
Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna; University of Essex
Search for more papers by this authorIleana Steccolini
Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna; University of Essex
Search for more papers by this authorThe authors wish to thank the editors, Noel Hyndman and Mariannunziata Liguori and two anonymous reviewers for valuable feedback on earlier drafts of this paper, as well as seminar participants at Sussex Business School, Essex Business School, the 2021 Alternative Accounts Europe Conference (AAEC), the 13th Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Accounting (IPA) Conference, and the 1st International Centre of Public Accountability (ICOPA) workshop for helpful comments and suggestions. All remaining errors are our sole responsibility.
Abstract
This paper analyses the form that government accountability takes during a crisis. Based on 52 press conferences, declarations, and speeches made by Italian central government officials in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, the paper shows that accountability was enacted, in practice, through Goffmanian performances, in three separate ways. First, performances aimed at defining the crisis, first as a situation under control, and later as an emergency. Second, performances served to allocate responsibility for ending the crisis, first to the government and then to the citizenry. Finally, performances allowed the establishment of a hierarchy of the values that would justify the crisis response policies—preserving access to healthcare as opposed to safeguarding other economic, individual, and societal interests. Variations in the elements of performances gave rise to three shifting configurations of accountability—paternalistic, political, and communal—that followed the evolution of the crisis. Collectively, the findings deepen our understanding of the role that accountability has in the justification of the crisis response policies.
REFERENCES
- Ahmad, S., C. Connolly, and I. Demirag (2021), ‘Testing Times: Governing a Pandemic with Numbers’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 1362–75.
- Ahn, P. D. and D. Wickramasinghe (2021), ‘Pushing the Limits of Accountability: Big Data Analytics Containing and Controlling COVID-19 in South Korea’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 1320–31.
- Ahrens, T. and L. Ferry (2018), ‘Institutional Entrepreneurship, Practice Memory, and Cultural Memory: Choice and Creativity in the Pursuit of Endogenous Change of Local Authority Budgeting’, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 38, pp. 12–21.
- Alawattage, C. and J. D. C. Azure (2021), ‘Behind the World Bank's Ringing Declarations of “Social Accountability”: Ghana's Public Financial Management Reform’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 78, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2019.02.002
- Ansell, C. and A. Boin (2019), ‘Taming Deep Uncertainty: The Potential of Pragmatist Principles for Understanding and Improving Strategic Crisis Management’, Administration and Society, Vol. 51, No. 7, pp. 1079–112.
- Baker, C. R. (2014), ‘Breakdowns of Accountability in the Face of Natural Disasters: The Case of Hurricane Katrina’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 25, No. 7, pp. 620–32.
- Bergman, M. and J.-E. Lane (1990), ‘Public Policy in a Principal–Agent Framework’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 339–52.
10.1177/0951692890002003005 Google Scholar
- Boltanski, L. and L. Thévenot (2006), On Justification: Economies of Worth, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
- Bovens, M. (2010), ‘Two Concepts of Accountability: Accountability as a Virtue and as a Mechanism’, West European Politics, Vol. 33, No. 5, pp. 946–67.
- Bozeman, B. (2007), Public Values and Public Interest: Counterbalancing Economic Individualism, Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC.
- Bozeman, B. (2019), ‘Public Values: Citizens’ Perspective’, Public Management Review, Vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 817–38.
- Bracci, E., I. Saliterer, M. Sicilia, and I. Steccolini (2021), ‘Accounting for (Public) Value(s): Reconsidering Publicness in Accounting Research and Practice’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 34, No. 7, pp. 1513–26.
- Burchell, S., C. Clubb, A. Hopwood, J. Hughes, and J. Nahapiet (1980), ‘The Roles of Accounting in Organizations and Society’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 5–27.
10.1016/0361-3682(80)90017-3 Google Scholar
- Corrigan, L. T. (2018), ‘Budget Making: The Theatrical Presentation of Accounting Discourse’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 55, pp. 12–32.
- Dunne, N. J., N. M. Brennan, and C. E. Kirwan (2021), ‘Impression Management and Big Four Auditors: Scrutiny at a Public Inquiry’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 88, 101170, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2020.101170.
- Everett, J. and C. Friesen (2010), ‘Humanitarian Accountability and Performance in the Théâtre de l'Absurde’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 468–85.
10.1016/j.cpa.2010.01.014 Google Scholar
- Ferry, L., T. Ahrens, and R. Khalifa (2019), ‘Public Value, Institutional Logics and Practice Variation During Austerity Localism at Newcastle City Council’, Public Management Review, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 96–115.
- Firoozi, M. and C. H. Ku (2023), ‘Corporate Accountability During Crisis in the Digitized Era’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 933–64.
- Gallhofer, S. and J. Haslam (1991), ‘The Aura of Accounting in the Context of a Crisis: Germany and the First World War’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 487–520.
10.1016/0361-3682(91)90039-H Google Scholar
- Gioia, D. A., K. G. Corley, and A. L. Hamilton (2013), ‘Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology’, Organizational Research Methods, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 15–31.
- Goffman, E. (1956), The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, University of Edinburgh Social Sciences Research Centre, Edinburgh.
- Goretzki, L. and M. Messner (2019), ‘Backstage and Frontstage Interactions in Management Accountants’ Identity Work’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 74, pp. 1–20.
- de Graaf, G., L. Huberts, and R. Smulders (2016), ‘Coping with Public Value Conflicts’, Administration and Society, Vol. 48, No. 9, pp. 1101–27.
- Graeber, D. (2013), ‘It is Value That Brings Universes into Being’, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 219–43.
10.14318/hau3.2.012 Google Scholar
- Helgesson, C.-F. and F. Muniesa (2013), ‘For What It's Worth: An Introduction to Valuation Studies’, Valuation Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 1–10.
10.3384/vs.2001-5992.13111 Google Scholar
- Hood, C. (2007), ‘What Happens When Transparency Meets Blame-avoidance?’, Public Management Review, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 191–210.
- Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling (1976), ‘Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure’, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 305–60.
- Joannides, V. (2012), ‘Accounterability and the Problematics of Accountability’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 244–57.
10.1016/j.cpa.2011.12.008 Google Scholar
- Jørgensen, T. B. and B. Bozeman (2007), ‘Public Values: An Inventory’, Administration and Society, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 354–81.
- Kluckholn, C. (1962), Culture and Behavior, The Free Press of Glencoe, New York.
- M. Kornberger, L. Justesen, A. K. Madsen, and J. Mouritsen (Eds) (2015), Making Things Valuable, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198712282.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Kornberger, M., S. Leixnering, and R. E. Meyer (2019), ‘The Logic of Tact: How Decisions Happen in Situations of Crisis’, Organization Studies, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 239–66.
- Lai, A., G. Leoni, and R. Stacchezzini (2014), ‘The Socializing Effects of Accounting in Flood Recovery’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 25, No. 7, pp. 579–603.
- Lamont, M. (2012), ‘Toward a Comparative Sociology of Valuation and Evaluation’, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 38, pp. 201–21.
- Lounsbury, M. (2008), ‘Institutional Rationality and Practice Variation: New Directions in the Institutional Analysis of Practice’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 33, Nos 4–5, pp. 349–61.
- MacIntyre, A. (1981a), After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, Gerald Duckworth & Co. Ltd, London.
- MacIntyre, A. (1981b), ‘The Nature of the Virtues’, The Hastings Center Report, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 27–34.
- Manning, P. K. (2008), ‘Goffman on Organizations’, Organization Studies, Vol. 29, No. 5, pp. 677–99.
- McKernan, J. F. (2012), ‘Accountability as Aporia, Testimony, and Gift’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 258–78.
10.1016/j.cpa.2011.12.009 Google Scholar
- McPhail, K., R. O. Nyamori, and S. Taylor (2016), ‘Escaping Accountability: A Case of Australia's Asylum Seeker Policy’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 947–84.
- Messner, M. (2009), ‘The Limits of Accountability’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 34, No. 8, pp. 918–38.
- Millo, Y., M. Power, K. Robson, and H. Vollmer (2021), ‘Editorial: Themed Section on Accounting and Valuation Studies’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 91, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2020.101223.
- Mitchell, F., Nørreklit, H., Nørreklit, L., Cinquini, L., Koeppe, F., Magnacca, F., Mauro, S. G., Jakobsen, M., Korhonen, T., Laine, T., & Liboriussen, J. M. (2021) ‘Evaluating Performance Management of COVID-19 Reality in Three European Countries: A Pragmatic Constructivist Study’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 1345–1361.
- Mueller, F. (2018), ‘Taking Goffman Seriously: Developing Strategy-as-practice’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 53, pp. 16–30.
- Patton, M. Q. (2002), Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
- Perkiss, S. and L. Moerman (2018), ‘A Dispute in the Making: A Critical Examination of Displacement, Climate Change and the Pacific Islands’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 166–92.
- Perkiss, S. and L. Moerman (2020), ‘Hurricane Katrina: Exploring Justice and Fairness as a Sociology of Common Good(s)’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 67–68, 102022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2017.11.002.
- Pollock, T.G., K. Lasley, V. Rindova, and J.-H. Han (2019) ‘Which of These Things Are Not Like the Others? Comparing the Rational, Emotional, and Moral Aspects of Reputation, Status, Celebrity, and Stigma’, Academy of Management Annals, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 444–78.
- Poulsen, B. (2022), ‘When Civil Servants Go Frontstage: The Mediatization of the Role of the Civil Servant During the COVID-19 Crisis’, Administrative Sciences, Vol. 12, No. 3, https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12030073.
- Roberts, J. (1991), ‘The Possibilities of Accountability’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 355–68.
- Roberts, J. (2001), ‘Trust and Control in Anglo-American Systems of Corporate Governance: The Individualizing and Socializing Effects of Processes of Accountability’, Human Relations, Vol. 54, No. 12, pp. 1547–72.
- Roberts, J. (2009), ‘No One is Perfect: The Limits of Transparency and an Ethic for “Intelligent” Accountability’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 34, No. 8, pp. 957–70.
- Roberts, J. and R. Scapens (1985), ‘Accounting Systems and Systems of Accountability: Understanding Accounting Practices in Their Organizational Contexts’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 443–56.
- Sargiacomo, M. (2015), ‘Earthquakes, Exceptional Government, and Extraordinary Accounting’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 67–89.
10.1016/j.aos.2015.02.001 Google Scholar
- Schweiker, W. (1993), ‘Accounting for Ourselves: Accounting Practice and the Discourse of Ethics’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 18, Nos 2–3, pp. 231–52.
- Shearer, T. (2002), ‘Ethics and Accountability: From the For-itself to the For-the-other’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 541–73.
- Stark, D. (2009), The Sense of Dissonance: Accounts of Worth in Economic Life, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
10.1515/9781400831005 Google Scholar
- Steccolini, I. (2019), ‘Accounting and the Post-new Public Management: Re-considering Publicness in Accounting Research’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 255–79.
- Tsilimpounidi, M. (2017), Sociology of Crisis: Visualizing Urban Austerity, Routledge, London.
- Vachris, M. A. (2004), ‘ Principal–Agent Relationships in the Theory of Bureaucracy’, in C.K. Rowley and F. Schneider (Eds), The Encyclopedia of Public Choice, Springer US, Boston, pp. 758–61.
- Van der Wal, Z., T. Nabatchi, and G. De Graaf (2015), ‘From Galaxies to Universe: A Cross-disciplinary Review and Analysis of Public Values Publications from 1969 to 2012’, American Review of Public Administration, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 13–28.
- Zahariadis, N., E. Petridou, and L. I. Oztig (2020), ‘Claiming Credit and Avoiding Blame: Political Accountability in Greek and Turkish responses to the COVID-19 Crisis’, European Policy Analysis, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 159–69.