Volume 5, Issue 2 pp. 192-196
TECHNICAL NOTE

Esophagogastric reconstruction using remnant stomach with a single vessel pedicel: Technique and outcomes

Bin You

Bin You

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Chao-yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Respiratory and Pulmonary Circulation, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Beijing, China

Search for more papers by this author
Sheng-cai Hou

Sheng-cai Hou

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Chao-yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Respiratory and Pulmonary Circulation, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Beijing, China

Search for more papers by this author
Hui Li

Corresponding Author

Hui Li

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Chao-yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Respiratory and Pulmonary Circulation, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Beijing, China

Correspondence

Hui Li, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Chao-yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China.

Tel: +86 10 85231044

Fax: +86 10 85231165

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Bin Hu

Bin Hu

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Chao-yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Respiratory and Pulmonary Circulation, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Beijing, China

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 May 2013
Citations: 2

Abstract

Esophageal cancer with a history of distal gastrectomy is a clinical problem. To our knowledge there have been no reports of remnant stomach fed from the left gastroepiploic artery being used in esophageal reconstruction. We, herein, report four cases of esophagogastric reconstruction using remnant stomach with a single left gastroepiploic vascular pedicel. It is more functional to use the remnant stomach than other replacements. Meanwhile, the gastric conduit fed from the left gastroepiploic artery showed sufficient vascularity and stable gastroesophageal anastomosis. The technique and outcomes in follow-up have proven feasible and save time.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.