Volume 22, Issue 4 pp. 619-625
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

An evaluation of the Virtual Monitoring Clinic, a novel nurse-led service for monitoring patients with stable rheumatoid arthritis

Li-Ching Chew

Corresponding Author

Li-Ching Chew

Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore

DukeNUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore

Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

Correspondence

Li-Ching Chew, Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Singapore General Hospital, Academia, Singapore, Singapore.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Xiaohui Xin

Xiaohui Xin

Medicine Academic Clinical Programme, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore

Search for more papers by this author
Hui Yang

Hui Yang

Medicine Academic Clinical Programme, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore

Search for more papers by this author
Julian Thumboo

Julian Thumboo

Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore

DukeNUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore

Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 18 November 2018
Citations: 28

Abstract

Objectives

To study clinical and patient reported outcomes for the Virtual Monitoring Clinic (VMC), a remote nurse-led telemonitoring service for monitoring Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs).

Methods

Patients with stable RA enrolled in the VMC were followed up prospectively. The primary outcomes evaluated at 1-year follow-up were: Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28), Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3), and patient satisfaction assessed using an 11-point Likert scale.

Results

Of the 251 patients enrolled, 186 completed 1-year of follow-up. There was a 2.3% (n = 450) reduction in the annual workload from the rheumatology specialist outpatient clinic as a result of the VMC. Statistically significant improvement was seen in the mean patient satisfaction score (7.70-8.16, ≤ 0.001), with 61.5% of patients opting for the VMC alternating with rheumatology outpatient clinic visits as their preferred mode of follow-up vis-à-vis standard care. There was a marginal increase in mean DAS28 and RAPID3 scores from 2.56 to 2.78 (P < 0.05) and 5.28 to 6.03 (P < 0.05), respectively. However, given that at 1-year follow-up more than half (72.0% and 63.4% based on DAS28 and RAPID3) of the patients’ disease activity had improved or remained stable, and was in remission or low activity (73.1% and 53.2% based on DAS28 and RAPID3), the VMC seemed to maintain a stable RA disease activity for the majority of patients.

Conclusions

The VMC is an effective and well-accepted novel approach for the management of patients with stable RA.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.