Volume 64, Issue 2 pp. 287-292
Radiation Oncology—Original Article

Is prospective MRI mapping of the changes in the volume of the prostate gland in prostate cancer patients undergoing 6 months of neo-adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy a step towards a trial to determine those who may benefit from treatment intensification or extended duration?

David RH Christie

Corresponding Author

David RH Christie

GenesisCare, Tugun, Queensland, Australia

Brain-Behaviour Research Group, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia

Correspondence

Prof David RH Christie, GenesisCare, Inland Drive, Tugun, Qld 4224, Australia.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Christopher F Sharpley

Christopher F Sharpley

Brain-Behaviour Research Group, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Natalia Mitina

Natalia Mitina

GenesisCare, Tugun, Queensland, Australia

University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Eamonn MacAteer

Eamonn MacAteer

South Coast Radiology, Pindara Hospital, Benowa, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
James E Jackson

James E Jackson

Icon Cancer Centre, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia

School of Medicine, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Dominic Lunn

Dominic Lunn

Icon Cancer Centre, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 15 March 2020
Citations: 2
DRH Christie MbChB FRANZCR; CF Sharpley PhD, FAPS, FCCLP; N Mitina FRANZCR; E MacAteer FRANZCR; JE Jackson MBBS FRANZCR; D Lunn MBBS FRANZCR, DipPallMed (Clinical).
Conflict of interest: Ipsen provided financial support for the statistical analysis, but had no role in the design of the study or the publication of the results.

Abstract

Introduction

Neo-adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy prior to radiotherapy (RT) causes shrinkage of the prostate gland, but the changes in volume have never been mapped over time in detail, nor have the associations between volume reduction and testosterone escape or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) kinetics been determined.

Methods

Fifty consecutive patients with prostate cancer were treated with 6 months of triptorelin prior to definitive RT. The volume of the prostate gland was measured at the outset and every 6–7 weeks thereafter using MRI scans. The volumes were calculated using a planimetric method, and inter-rater reliability was checked. Factors associated with a large initial volume and greater reductions in it were assessed.

Results

The median volume at the outset was 45 cc, and the median reductions every 6 weeks thereafter were 23, 18, 9 and 5%. The inter-rater agreement was high (r > 0.9, < 0.001). There were no baseline clinical factors associated with a high initial prostate volume, but the initial volume was associated with greater volume reduction. Testosterone escape had no effect on the reduction, and changes in volume were not reflected in PSA response kinetics.

Conclusions

Reductions in volume continue throughout a 6-month course of neo-adjuvant therapy but are greatest during the first 6 weeks. Although individualisation of the duration or intensity of the hormone treatment warrants further investigation, the role of prostate gland volume reduction remains uncertain. More detailed studies of tumour volume might be possible if the imaging required was acceptable and accessible to patients.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.