Volume 62, Issue 1 pp. 128-132
Radiation Oncology—Original Article

Evaluation of kidney motion with and without a pneumatic abdominal compression belt: Considerations for stereotactic radiotherapy

Kimberley West

Corresponding Author

Kimberley West

Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Correspondence

Mrs. Kimberley West, Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, 199 Ipswich Road, Woolloongabba, Brisbane 4102, Qld, Australia.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Majella Russo

Majella Russo

Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Elizabeth Brown

Elizabeth Brown

Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Tamara Barry

Tamara Barry

Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Cathy Hargrave

Cathy Hargrave

Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

School of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
David Pryor

David Pryor

Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 09 October 2017
Citations: 3
K West BAppSc (MRT); M Russo BAppSc (MRT); E Brown PhD; T Barry BAppSc (MRT); C Hargrave MAppSc (Research); D Pryor MBBS, FRANZCR.
Conflict of interest: None declared.

Abstract

Introduction

The optimal delivery of stereotactic radiotherapy for kidney tumours requires an effective motion management strategy. This study assessed the effectiveness of a pneumatic abdominal compression belt in reducing kidney motion during free breathing.

Methods

Thirteen patients, with four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) of the abdomen in free breathing with and without a pneumatic abdominal compression belt, were retrospectively reviewed. Points of Interest (POI) were placed on each kidney to determine the greatest magnitude of displacement in all directions.

Results

Without compression, all patients had >5.0 mm motion in the craniocaudal (CC) direction in at least one kidney. Median CC excursion of the left superior pole was reduced with compression from 8.0 mm (range 2.0 mm–18.0 mm) to 4.0 mm (range 2.0 mm–10.0 mm, P = 0.047) and right superior pole from 10.0 mm (range 4.0 mm–16.0 mm) to 6.0 mm (range 2.0 mm–10.0 mm, P=value 0.051). A benefit was less evident for the left and right inferior poles with median CC excursion of 6.0 mm versus 4.0 mm and 5.0 mm versus 4.0 mm without and with compression, respectively. Median displacement in the anteroposterior direction (≤3.2 mm) and lateral directions (≤1.3 mm) was similar for left and right kidneys and not significantly altered by compression. Overall, seven patients had kidney motion reduced by >5.0 mm with two reduced by 10.0 mm.

Conclusion

A pneumatic abdominal compression belt reduced kidney motion by >5.0 mm in seven of thirteen patients. The relative benefit is patient and location specific and should be assessed on an individual basis.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.