Volume 62, Issue 1 pp. 116-121
Radiation Oncology—Original Article

Effects of interruptions of external beam radiation therapy on outcomes in patients with prostate cancer

Yanqun Dong

Yanqun Dong

Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Nicholas G Zaorsky

Nicholas G Zaorsky

Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Tianyu Li

Tianyu Li

Department of Biostatistics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Thomas M Churilla

Thomas M Churilla

Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Rosalia Viterbo

Rosalia Viterbo

Department of Urologic Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Mark L Sobczak

Mark L Sobczak

Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Marc C Smaldone

Marc C Smaldone

Department of Urologic Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

Search for more papers by this author
David YT Chen

David YT Chen

Department of Urologic Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Robert G Uzzo

Robert G Uzzo

Department of Urologic Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Mark A Hallman

Mark A Hallman

Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Eric M Horwitz

Corresponding Author

Eric M Horwitz

Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

Correspondence

Dr Eric M Horwitz, Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Ave., Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 13 October 2017
Citations: 14
Y Dong MD, PhD; NG Zaorsky MD; T Li MS; TM Churilla MD; R Viterbo MD; ML Sobczak MD; MC Smaldone MD; DYT Chen MD; RG Uzzo MD; MA Hallman MD, PhD; EM Horwitz MD.
Conflict of interest: None.

Abstract

Introduction

To evaluate if interruptions of external beam radiation therapy impact outcomes in men with localized prostate cancer (PCa).

Methods

We included men with localized PCa treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) or intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) of escalated dose (≥74 Gy in 1.8 or 2 Gy fractions) between 1992 and 2013 at an NCI-designated cancer centre. Men receiving androgen deprivation therapy were excluded. The non-treatment day ratio (NTDR) was defined as the number of non-treatment days divided by the total elapsed days of therapy. NTDR was analysed for each National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk group.

Results

There were 1728 men included (839 low-risk, 776 intermediate-risk and 113 high-risk), with a median follow up of 53.5 months (range 12–185.8). The median NTDR was 31% (range 23–71%), translating to approximately 2 breaks (each break represents a missed treatment that will be made up) for 8 weeks of RT with 5 treatments per week. The 75 percentile of NTDR was 33%, translating to approximately 4 breaks, which was used as the cutoff for analysis. There were no significant differences in freedom from biochemical failure, freedom from distant metastasis, cancer specific survival, or overall survival for men with NTDR ≥33% compared to NTDR<33% for each risk group. Multivariable analyses including NTDR, age, race, Gleason score, T stage, and PSA were performed using the proportional hazards regression procedure. NTDR≥33% was not significantly associated with increased hazard ratio for outcomes in each risk group compared to NTDR<33%.

Conclusion

Unintentional treatment breaks during dose escalated external beam radiation therapy for PCa did not cause a significant difference in outcomes, although duration of follow up limits the strength of this conclusion.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.