Volume 64, Issue 5 pp. 1482-1485
Technical Note

Raman Spectroscopic Differences between Ephedrine and Pseudoephedrine

Tianmin Shu M.S.

Tianmin Shu M.S.

Department of Criminal Investigation, The Third Research Institute of the Ministry of Public Security, No. 76, Yueyang Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, China, 200031

Search for more papers by this author
Xing Yang Ph.D.

Xing Yang Ph.D.

College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Lanzhou University, No. 222, South Tianshui Road, Chengguan District, Lanzhou, Gansu Province, China, 730000

Search for more papers by this author
Wenbo Li M.S.

Wenbo Li M.S.

Department of Criminal Investigation, The Third Research Institute of the Ministry of Public Security, No. 76, Yueyang Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, China, 200031

Search for more papers by this author
Xiaojun Yao Ph.D.

Corresponding Author

Xiaojun Yao Ph.D.

College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Lanzhou University, No. 222, South Tianshui Road, Chengguan District, Lanzhou, Gansu Province, China, 730000

Corresponding author: Xiaojun Yao, Ph.D. E-mail: [email protected].Search for more papers by this author
First published: 05 March 2019
Citations: 4
Financial support provided by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0801304).

Abstract

Ephedrine (EPH) and pseudoephedrine (PSE) were studied by micro-Raman spectroscopy and UV resonance Raman spectroscopy excited at 785 and 360 nm, respectively. Raman bands at approximately 245 and 410 cm−1 for ephedrine have apparent differences from the same bands at approximately 215, 265, 350, 450, and 555 cm−1 for pseudoephedrine, and these differences can be applied to distinguish between EPH and PSE. Additionally, density functional theory was used for the Raman calculations to obtain results identical to the experimental spectra. This work is expected to expand the applications of Raman spectroscopy in forensic science.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.