Fate and Behavior of Gunshot Residue—A Review
Lauren S. Blakey B.Sc.
School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Faculty of Science, Liverpool John Moores University, Byrom Street, L3 3AF Liverpool, UK
Search for more papers by this authorGeorge P. Sharples Ph.D.
School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Faculty of Science, Liverpool John Moores University, Byrom Street, L3 3AF Liverpool, UK
Search for more papers by this authorKal Chana G.R.S.C.
Orchid Cellmark, PO Box 265, Abingdon, OX14 1YX Oxfordshire, UK
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Jason W. Birkett Ph.D.
School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Faculty of Science, Liverpool John Moores University, Byrom Street, L3 3AF Liverpool, UK
Additional information and reprint requests:
Jason W. Birkett, Ph.D.
School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences
Liverpool John Moores University
James Parsons Building
Byrom Street
Liverpool
L3 3AF
UK
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorLauren S. Blakey B.Sc.
School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Faculty of Science, Liverpool John Moores University, Byrom Street, L3 3AF Liverpool, UK
Search for more papers by this authorGeorge P. Sharples Ph.D.
School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Faculty of Science, Liverpool John Moores University, Byrom Street, L3 3AF Liverpool, UK
Search for more papers by this authorKal Chana G.R.S.C.
Orchid Cellmark, PO Box 265, Abingdon, OX14 1YX Oxfordshire, UK
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Jason W. Birkett Ph.D.
School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Faculty of Science, Liverpool John Moores University, Byrom Street, L3 3AF Liverpool, UK
Additional information and reprint requests:
Jason W. Birkett, Ph.D.
School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences
Liverpool John Moores University
James Parsons Building
Byrom Street
Liverpool
L3 3AF
UK
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
A review of the literature concerning the fate and behavior of gunshot residue (GSR) is presented. A number of concomitant parameters including firearm and ammunition type, plume and GSR material characteristics, travel distances, chemical composition and GSR morphology are critically discussed in relation to their effects on the distribution and deposition, transfer and persistence processes of GSR. The underlying mechanisms associated with such processes are also considered. Knowledge of these processes on GSR materials could provide valuable information concerning scene preservation and subsequent forensic sampling. The number of GSR particles deposited can vary significantly with each firearm discharge, highlighting the potential to produce distinctive data in each individual case. With the continual development and compositional changes of new ammunition types, further evaluation of the effect these processes may have on GSR evidence and their possible influence on the interpretation of the analytical results should be given due consideration.
References
- 1 Scientific Working Group for Gunshot Residue (SWGGSR). Guide for primer gunshot residue analysis by scanning electron microscopy/energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry. Cincinnati, OH: SWGGSR, 2011; 1–100.
- 2Schwoeble AJ, Exline DL. Current methods in forensic gunshot residue analysis. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2000.
10.1201/9781420042573 Google Scholar
- 3Basu S. Formation of gunshot residues. J Forensic Sci 1982; 27(1): 72–91.
- 4Dalby O, Butler D, Birkett JW. Analysis of gunshot residue and associated materials – a Review. J Forensic Sci 2010; 55(4): 924–43.
- 5Lindsay E, McVicar MJ, Gerard RV, Randall ED, Pearson J. Passive exposure and persistence of gunshot residue (GSR) on bystanders to a shooting: comparison of shooter and bystander exposure to GSR. Can Soc Forensic Sci J 2011; 44(3): 89–96.
10.1080/00085030.2011.10768144 Google Scholar
- 6Meng H, Caddy B. Gunshot residue analysis – a review. J Forensic Sci 1997; 42(4): 553–70.
- 7Romolo FS, Margot P. Identification of gunshot residue: a critical review. Forensic Sci Int 2001; 119: 195–211.
- 8Chang KH, Jayaprakash PT, Yew CH, Abdullah AFL. Gunshot residue analysis and its evidential values: a review. Aust J Forensic Sci 2013; 45(1): 3–23.
- 9Goudsmits E, Sharples GP, Birkett JW. Recent trends in organic gunshot residue analysis. TrAC 2015; 74: 46–57.
- 10Goudsmits E, Sharples GP, Birkett JW. Preliminary classification of characteristic organic gunshot residue compounds. Sci Justice 2016; 56(6): 421–5.
- 11Wallace JS. Chemical analysis of firearms, ammunition, and gunshot residue. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2008. Chapter 17: Properties of firearm discharge residue; 123–33.
- 12Wolten GM, Nesbitt RS, Calloway AR, Loper GL, Jones PF. Final report on particle analysis for gunshot residue detection, report ATR-77(7915). Segundo, CA: The Aerospace Corp, 1977.
- 13Basu S, Boone CE, Denio DJ, Miazga RA. Fundamental studies of gunshot residue deposition by glue-lift. J Forensic Sci 1997; 42(4): 571–81.
- 14Klingenberg G. Gun muzzle blast and flash. Propellants, Explos, Pyrotech 1989; 14(2): 57–68.
- 15Burnett B. The form of gunshot residue is modified by target impact. J Forensic Sci 1989; 34(4): 808–22.
- 16Fojtášek L, Kmjeé T. Time periods of GSR particles deposition after discharge-final results. Forensic Sci Int 2005; 153(2): 132–5.
- 17Andrasko J, Pettersson S. A simple method for collection of gunshot residues from clothing. Sci Justice 1991; 31(3): 321–30.
- 18Ditrich H. Distribution of gunshot residues – the influence of weapon type. J Forensic Sci 2012; 220: 85–90.
- 19Chohra M, Beladel B, Ahmed LB, Mouzai M, Akretche D, Zeghdaoui A, et al. Study of gunshot residue by NAA and ESEM/EDX using several kinds of weapon and ammunition. J Rad Res App Sci 2015; 8(3): 404–10.
- 20Fojtášek L. Vacı́nová J, Kolář P, Kotrlý M. Distribution of GSR particles in the surroundings of shooting pistol. Forensic Sci Int 2003; 132(2): 99–105.
- 21Gerard RV, McVicar MJ, Lindsay E, Randall ED, Harvey E. The long range deposition of gunshot residue and the mechanism of Its transportation. Can Soc Forensic Sci J 2011; 44(3): 97–104.
10.1080/00085030.2011.10768145 Google Scholar
- 22Carreras LF, Palma LAM.Ejection patterns of shot residues made from 9 mm Parabellum gun, 9 mm short gun,38 revolver and 7.62 mm Cetme rifle. Forensic Sci Int 1998; 96(2–3): 143–72.
- 23Lepik D, Vasiliev V. Comparison of injuries caused by the pistols Tokarev, Makarov and Glock 19 at firing distances of 10, 15 and 25 cm. Forensic Sci Int 2005; 151: 1–10.
- 24Deinet W, Leszczynski C. Examinations to determine close-range firing distances using a process control computer. Forensic Sci Int 1986; 31: 41–54.
- 25Cornelis R, Timperman J. Gunfiring detection method based on Sb, Ba, Pb, and Hg deposits on hands. Evaluation of the credibility of the test. Med Sci Law 1974; 14(2): 98–116.
- 26López-López M, Delgado JJ, Garcia-Ruiz C. Analysis of macroscopic gunshot residues by Raman spectroscopy to assess the weapon memory effect. Forensic Sci Int 2013; 231(1): 1–5.
- 27Wallace JS. Discharge residue from mercury fulminate-primed ammunition. Sci Justice 1998; 38(1): 7–14.
- 28Udey RN, Hunter BC, Smith RW. Differentiation of bullet type based on the analysis of gunshot residue using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. J Forensic Sci 2011; 56(5): 1268–76.
- 29Brożek-Mucha Z. Distribution and properties of gunshot residue originating from a Luger 9 mm ammunition in the vicinity of the shooting gun. Forensic Sci Int 2009; 183(1): 33–44.
- 30Booker JL, Schroeder DD, Propp JH. A note on the variability of barium and antimony levels in cartridge primers and its implication for gunshot residue identification. J Forensic Sci Soc 1984; 24(2): 81–4.
- 31Brożek-Mucha Z. Evaluation of the possibility of differentiation between various types of ammunition by means of GSR examination with SEM-EDX method. Forensic Sci Int 2001; 123(1): 39–47.
- 32Botello D, Deskins D, Staton P, Rushton C, Copeland J. The effects of Powder, Barrel Length & Velocity on Distance Determination [research paper]. Huntington, WV: Marshall University, 2013.
- 33Heard BJ. Handbook of firearms and forensic ballistics: examining and interpreting forensic evidence. 2nd edn. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2008. Chapter 6: Gunshot residue examination; 241–68.
- 34Zeichner A, Levin N, Dvorachek M. Gunshot residue particles formed by using ammunitions that have mercury fulminate based primers. J Forensic Sci 1992; 37(6): 1567–73.
- 35Kara l, Sarikavak Y, Lisesivdin SB, Kasap M. Evaluation of morphological and chemical differences of gunshot residues in different ammunitions using SEM/EDS technique. Environ Forensics 2016; 17(1): 68–79.
- 36Garofano L, Ripani L, Tomao P, Virgili A, Varetto L, Torre C. On the possibility of accidental contamination of GSR. Study of the diffusion and permanence the environment. Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Forensic Aspects of Trace Evidence; 1991 Jun 24-28; Quantico, VA. Washington, DC: FBI Academy, 1991.
- 37Syvitski JPM. Principles, methods and application of particle size analysis. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
10.1017/CBO9780511626142 Google Scholar
- 38Seamster A, Mead T, Gislason J, Jackson K, Ruddy F, Pate B. Studies of the spatial distribution of firearms discharge residues. J Forensic Sci 1976; 21(4): 868–82.
- 39Ravreby M. Analysis of long-range bullet entrance holes atomic absorption spectrophotometry and scanning electron microscopy. J Forensic Sci 1982; 27(1): 92–112.
- 40Lepik D, Vassiljev V. Comparison of gunshot injuries caused from Tokarev, Makarov and Glock 19 pistols at firing distances of 1, 3 and 5 cm. J Forensic Leg Med 2010; 17(8): 412–20.
- 41Lepik D, Vasiliev V, Reisenbuk H, Põldsam Ü. Comparison of injuries caused by the pistols Tokarev, Makarov and Glock 19 at firing distances of 25, 50, 75 and 100 cm. Forensic Sci Int 2008; 177(1): 1–10.
- 42Gradascevic A, Resic E, Sarajlic N, Franjic B, Salkic A, Dzuzdanovic-Pasalic A. Is it possible to determine firearm calibre and shooting range from the examination of gunshot residue in close range gunshot wounds? An experimental study. J Health Sci 2013; 3(3): 232–7.
10.17532/jhsci.2013.113 Google Scholar
- 43Brown H, Cauchi D, Holden J, Allen F, Cordner S, Thatcher P. Image analysis of gunshot residue on entry wounds: II – a statistical estimation of firing range. Forensic Sci Int 1999; 100(3): 179–86.
- 44Glattstein B, Vinokurov A, Levin N, Zeichner A. Improved method for shooting distance estimation. Part 1. Bullet holes in clothing items. J Forensic Sci 2000; 45(4): 801–6.
- 45Turillazzi E, Di Peri GP, Nieddu A, Bello S, Monaci F, Neri M, et al. Analytical and quantitative concentration of gunshot residues (Pb, Sb, Ba) to estimate entrance hole and shooting-distance using confocal laser microscopy and inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer analysis: an experimental study. Forensic Sci Int 2013; 231(1–3): 142–9.
- 46Neri M, Turillazzi E, Riezzo I, Fineschi V. The determination of firing distance applying a microscopic quantitative method and confocal laser scanning microscopy for detection of gunshot residue particles. Int J Legal Med 2007; 121(4): 287–92.
- 47Krishnan SS. Firing distance determination by neutron activation analysis. J Forensic Sci 1967; 12(4): 471–83.
- 48Santos A, Magalhães T, Vieira DN, Almeida AA, Sousa A. Firing distance estimation through the analysis of the gunshot residue deposit pattern around the bullet entrance hole by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry: an experimental study. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2007; 28(1): 24–30.
- 49Santos A, Ramos P, Fernandes L, Magalhães T, Almeida AA, Sousa A. Firing distance estimation based on the analysis of GSR distribution on the target surface using ICP-MS — an experimental study with a 7.65 mm × 17 mm Browning pistol (.32 ACP). Forensic Sci Int 2015; 247: 62–8.
- 50Gagliano-Candela R, Colucci AP, Napoli S. Determination of firing distance. Lead analysis on the target by atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS). J Forensic Sci 2008; 53(2): 321–4.
- 51Tschirhart DL, Noguchi TT, Klatt EC. A simple histochemical technique for the identification of gunshot residue. J Forensic Sci 1991; 36(2): 543–7.
- 52Nag NK, Sinha P. A note on assessability of firing distance from gunshot residues. Forensic Sci Int 1992; 56(1): 1–17.
- 53Bhattacharyya CN. Dispersion of firing discharge residues using a modified Maxwellian model. Forensic Sci Int 1990; 47(1): 31–7.
- 54Bhattacharyya CN. Dispersion of firing discharge residues using a Maxwellian model. Forensic Sci Int 1989; 42(3): 271–7.
- 55Schlesinger HL, Lukens HR, Guinn VP, Hackleman RP, Korts RF. Special report on gunshot residues measured by neutron activation analysis. USAEC Report GA-9829. San Diego, CA: Gulf General Atomic, 1970.
- 56Schyma C, Schyma P. The practical shooting proof The PVAL method compared to prints with foil. Rechtsmedizin 1997; 7(5): 152–6.
10.1007/PL00004141 Google Scholar
- 57Suchenwirth H. Ein einfaches spezifisches abdruckverfahren zum erfassen und beurteilen von schmauchbildern. Arch Kriminol 1972; 150: 152–9.
- 58Jalanti T, Henchoz P, Gallusser A, Bonfanti MS. The persistence of gunshot residue on shooters’ hands. Sci Justice 1999; 39(1): 48–52.
- 59Krishnan SS. Detection of gunshot residue on the hands by trace element analysis. J Forensic Sci 1977; 22(2): 304–24.
- 60Zeichner A, Levin N. Casework experience of GSR detection in Israel, on samples from hands, hair, and clothing using an autosearch SEM⁄ EDX system. J Forensic Sci 1995; 40(6): 1082–5.
- 61Zeichner A, Glattstein B. Recent developments in the methods of estimating shooting distance. Sci World J 2002; 2: 573–85.
- 62French J, Morgan R. An experimental investigation of the indirect transfer and deposition of gunshot residue: further studies carried out with SEM-EDX analysis. Forensic Sci Int 2015; 247: 14–7.
- 63Brożek-Mucha Z. On the prevalence of gunshot residue in selected populations – an empirical study performed with SEM-EDX analysis. Forensic Sci Int 2014; 237: 46–52.
- 64Cardinetti B, Ciampini C, Abate S, Marchetti C, Ferrari F, Tullio D, et al. A proposal for statistical evaluation of the detection of gunshot residues on a suspect. Scanning 2006; 28(3): 142–7.
- 65Biedermann A, Bozza S, Taroni F. Probabilistic evidential assessment of gunshot residue particle evidence (Part II): Bayesian parameter estimation for experimental count data. Forensic Sci Int 2011; 206(1): 103–10.
- 66Biedermann A, Bozza S, Taroni F. Probabilistic evidential assessment of gunshot residue particle evidence (Part I): likelihood ratio calculation and case pre-assessment using Bayesian networks. Forensic Sci Int 2009; 191(1): 24–35.
- 67Gauriot R, Gunaratnam L, Moroni R, Reinikainen T, Corander J. Statistical challenges in the quantification of gunshot residue evidence. J Forensic Sci 2013; 58(5): 1149–55.
- 68French JC, Morgan R, Davy J. The secondary transfer of gunshot residue: an experimental investigation carried out with SEM-EDX analysis. X-Ray Spectrom 2014; 43(1): 56–61.
- 69French JC, Morgan RM, Baxendell P, Bull PA. Multiple transfers of particulates and their dissemination within contact networks. Sci Justice 2012; 52(1): 33–41.
- 70Taroni F, Biedermann A, Bozza S, Garbolino P, Aitken C. Bayesian networks for probabilistic inference and decision analysis in forensic science. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2006.
10.1002/0470091754 Google Scholar
- 71Damary NK, Mandel M, Levin N, Izraeli E. Calculation of likelihood ratios for gunshot residue evidence – statistical aspects. Law, Probability and Risk 2016; 15(2): 107–25.
- 72Biedermann A, Taroni F. Bayesian networks for evaluating forensic DNA profiling evidence: a review and guide to literature. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2012; 6(2): 147–57.
- 73Rowe WF. Statistics in forensic ballistics. In: CGG Aitken, DA Stoney, eds. The use of statistics in forensic science. Chichester, UK: Ellis Horwood Limited, 1991; 168–77.
- 74Kilty JW. Activity after shooting and its effects on the retention of primer residue. J Forensic Sci 1975; 20(2): 219–30.
- 75Lebiedzik J, Johnson D. Rapid search and quantitative analysis of gunshot residue particles in the SEM. J Forensic Sci 2000; 45(1): 83–92.
- 76Gallidabino M, Biedermann A, Taroni F. Commentary on: Gauriot R, Gunaratnam L, Moroni R, Reinikainen T, Corander R. Statistical challenges in the quantification of gunshot residue evidence. J Forensic Sci 2013;58(5);1149–55. J Forensic Sci 2015; 60(2): 539–41.
- 77Charles S, Lannoy M, Geusens N. Influence of the type of fabric on the collection efficiency of gunshot residues. Forensic Sci Int 2013; 228(1): 42–6.
- 78Bull PA, Morgan RM, Sagovsky A, Hughes GJ. The transfer and persistence of trace particulates: experimental studies using clothing fabrics. Sci Justice 2006; 46(3): 185–95.
- 79Brożek-Mucha Z. Scanning electron microscopy and X-ray microanalysis for chemical and morphological characterisation of the inorganic component of gunshot residue: selected problems. Biomed Res Int 2014; 2014: 428038.
- 80Wallace JS. Evidence protection kit. Sci Justice 1995; 35(1): 11–4.
- 81Gialamas D, Rhodes EF, Sugarman LA. Officers, their weapons and their hands: an empirical study of GSR on the hands of non-shooting police officers. J Forensic Sci 1995; 40(6): 1086–9.
- 82Berk RE, Rochowicz SA, Wong M, Kopina MA. Gunshot residue in Chicago police vehicles and facilities: an empirical study. J Forensic Sci 2007; 52(4): 838–41.
- 83Pettersson S. What conclusion can be drawn from the presence of gunshot residues? Proceedings of the 3rd European Academy of Forensic Science Meeting Forensic Sci Int 2003; 136(Supp 1): 158.
- 84Gerard RV, Lindsay E, McVicar MJ, Randall ED, Gapinska A. Observations of gunshot residue associated with police officers, their equipment, and their vehicles. Can Soc Forensic Sci J 2012; 45(2): 57–63.
10.1080/00085030.2012.10757183 Google Scholar
- 85Charles S, Geusens N. A study of the potential risk of gunshot residue transfer from special units of the police to arrested suspects. Forensic Sci Int 2012; 216(1–3): 78–81.
- 86Lindsay E, McVicar MJ, Gerard RV, Randall ED. Observations of GSR on the hands of employees at firearms manufacturing facilities. Can Soc Forensic Sci J 2011; 44(3): 105–9.
10.1080/00085030.2011.10768146 Google Scholar
- 87Lucas N, Brown H, Cook M, Redman K, Condon T, Wrobel H, et al. A study into the distribution of gunshot residue particles in the random population. Forensic Sci Int 2016; 262: 150–5.
- 88Hannigan TJ, McDermott SD, Greaney CM, O'Shaughnessy J, O'Brien CM. Evaluation of gunshot residue (GSR) evidence: surveys of prevalence of GSR on clothing and frequency of residue types. Forensic Sci Int 2015; 257: 177–81.
- 89Torre C, Mattutino G, Vasino V, Robino C. Brake linings: a source of non-GSR particles containing lead, barium, and antimony. J Forensic Sci 2002; 47(3): 494–504.
- 90Grima M, Butler M, Hanson R, Mohameden A. Firework displays as sources of particles similar to gunshot residue. Sci Justice 2012; 52(1): 49–57.
- 91Grima M, Hanson R, Tidy H. An assessment of firework particle persistence on the hands and related police force practices in relation to GSR evidence. Forensic Sci Int 2014; 239: 19–26.
- 92Brożek-Mucha Z. Chemical and physical characterisation of welding fume particles for distinguishing from gunshot residue. Forensic Sci Int 2015; 254: 51–8.
- 93Quinn CC. Cartridge discharge residue contamination – the search for the source. Sci Justice 1998; 38(2): 81–4.
- 94Wright DM, Trimpe MA. Summary of the FBI Laboratory's Gunshot Residue Symposium, May 31-June 3, 2005. Forensic Science Communications 2006 July;8(3).
- 95Harrison HC, Gilroy R. Detection of gunshot residues on the hands by trace element analysis. J Forensic Sci 1959; 4: 184–99.
- 96Schütz F, Bonfanti MS, Desboeufs S. Evaluation of parameters influencing GSR'S retention on shooter's hands. Prob Forensic Sci 2001; 47: 380–6.
- 97Vinokurov A, Zeichner A, Glattstein B, Koffman A, Levin N, Rosengarten A. Machine washing or brushing of clothing and its influence an shooting distance estimation. J Forensic Sci 2001; 46(4): 928–33.
- 98Nesbitt RS, Wessel JE, Jones PF. Detection of gunshot residue by use of the scanning electron microscope. J Forensic Sci 1976; 21(3): 595–610.
- 99Rosenberg MB, Dockery CR. Determining the lifetime of detectable amounts of gunshot residue on the hands of a shooter using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. Appl Spectrosc 2008; 62(11): 1238–41.
- 100Meng HH, Lee HC. Elemental analysis of primer mixtures and gunshot residues from handgun cartridges commonly encountered in Taiwan. Forensic Sci J 2007; 6(1): 39–54.
- 101Knechtle P, Gallusser A. La persistance des réksidus de tir sur les mains selon I'activité du tireur. Revue International de Criminologie et de Police Technique 1996; 49(2): 228–46.
- 102Schwartz RH, Zona CA. A recovery method for airborne gunshot residue retained in human nasal mucus. J Forensic Sci 1995; 40(4): 659–61.
- 103Zeichner A, Levin N. Collection efficiency of GSR particles from hair and hands using double-side adhesive tape. J Forensic Sci 1993; 38(3): 571–84.
- 104Brożek-Mucha Z. Chemical and morphological study of gunshot residue persisting on the shooter by means of scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry. Microsc Microanal 2011; 17(6): 972–82.
- 105Brożek-Mucha Z. Variation of the chemical contents and morphology of gunshot residue in the surroundings of the shooting pistol as a potential contribution to a shooting incidence reconstruction. Forensic Sci Int 2011; 210(1): 31–41.
- 106Lindström AC, Hoogewerff J, Athens J, Obertova Z, Duncan W, Waddell N, et al. Gunshot residue preservation in seawater. Forensic Sci Int 2015; 253: 103–11.
- 107Amadasi A, Brandone A, Rizzi A, Mazzarelli D, Cattaneo C. The survival of metallic residues from gunshot wounds in cremated bone: a SEM-EDX study. Int J Legal Med 2012; 126(4): 525–31.
- 108Rijnders MR, Stamouli A, Bolck A. Comparison of GSR composition occurring at different locations around the firing position. J Forensic Sci 2010; 55(3): 616–23.
- 109Douse JM, Smith RN. Trace analysis of explosives and firearm discharge residues in the metropolitan police forensic science laboratory. J Energ Mater 1986; 4(1–4): 169–86.
- 110Zech WD, Kneubühl B, Thali M, Bolliger S. Pistol thrown to the ground by shooter after fatal self inflicted gunshot wound to the chest. J Forensic Leg Med 2011; 18(2): 88–90.
- 111LaGoo L, Schaeffer LS, Szymanski DW, Smith RW. Detection of gunshot residue in blowfly larvae and decomposing porcine tissue using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). J Forensic Sci 2010; 55(3): 624–32.
- 112Gibelli D, Brandone A, Andreola S, Porta D, Giudici E, Grandi M, et al. Macroscopic, microscopic, and chemical assessment of gunshot lesions on decomposed pig skin. J Forensic Sci 2010; 55(4): 1092–7.
- 113Molina DK, Martinez M, Garcia J, DiMaio VJ. Gunshot residue testing in suicides: part I: analysis by scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2007; 28(3): 187–90.
- 114Molina DK, Martinez M, Garcia J, DiMaio VJ. Gunshot residue testing in suicides: part II: analysis by inductive coupled plasma – atomic emission spectrometry. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2007; 28(3): 191–4.
- 115Jane I, Brooks PG, Douse JMF, O'Callaghan KA. Detection of gunshot residues via analysis of their organic constituents. Proceedings of the international symposium on the analysis and detection of explosives; 1983 March 29-31; Quantico, VA. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1983.