Volume 58, Issue 5 pp. 1353-1358
Technical Note

Workplace Assessment of Targeted Violence Risk: The Development and Reliability of the WAVR-21

J. Reid Meloy Ph.D.

Corresponding Author

J. Reid Meloy Ph.D.

San Diego Psychoanalytic Institute, Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, 92169

Additional information and reprint requests:

Dr. J. Reid Meloy, Ph.D.

Department of Psychiatry

University of California, San Diego

PO Box 90699

San Diego, CA 92169

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Stephen G. White Ph.D.

Stephen G. White Ph.D.

Work Trauma Services, Inc., Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

Search for more papers by this author
Stephen Hart Ph.D.

Stephen Hart Ph.D.

ProActive Resolutions, Inc., Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 18 July 2013
Citations: 14
Co-authors J. Reid Meloy, Ph.D., and Stephen G. White, Ph.D., commercially benefit from the sale of the WAVR-21.

Abstract

This study describes the development of the WAVR-21, a structured professional judgment guide for the assessment of workplace targeted violence, and presents initial interrater reliability results. The 21-item instrument codes both static and dynamic risk factors and change, if any, over time. Five critical items or red flag indicators assess violent motives, ideation, intent, weapons skill, and pre-attack planning. Additional items assess the contribution of mental disorder, negative personality factors, situational factors, and a protective factor. Eleven raters each rated 12 randomly assigned cases from actual files of workplace threat scenarios. Summary interrater reliability correlation coefficients (ICCs) for overall presence of risk factors, risk of violence, and seriousness of the violent act were in the fair to good range, similar to other structured professional judgment instruments. A subgroup of psychologists who were coders produced an ICC of 0.76 for overall presence of risk factors. Some of the individual items had poor reliability for both clinical and statistical reasons. The WAVR-21 appears to improve the structuring and organizing of empirically based risk-relevant data and may enhance communication and decision making.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.