Volume 53, Issue S3 pp. 5438-5454
Special Issue: Linking VA and Non-VA Data to Address US Veteran Health Services Issues

Differences in Risk Scores of Veterans Receiving Community Care Purchased by the Veterans Health Administration

Amy K. Rosen Ph.D.

Corresponding Author

Amy K. Rosen Ph.D.

Center for Healthcare, Organization and Implementation Research, Boston, MA

Address correspondence to Amy K. Rosen, Ph.D., Center for Healthcare, Organization and Implementation Research, 150 S. Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02130; e-mail: [email protected].Search for more papers by this author
Todd H. Wagner Ph.D.

Todd H. Wagner Ph.D.

Health Economics Resource Center, Palo Alto VA, Menlo Park, CA

Center for Innovation to Implementation, Palo Alto VA, Menlo Park, CA

Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Menlo Park, CA

Search for more papers by this author
Warren B. P. Pettey M.P.H., C.P.H.

Warren B. P. Pettey M.P.H., C.P.H.

VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT

University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT

Search for more papers by this author
Michael Shwartz Ph.D.

Michael Shwartz Ph.D.

Center for Healthcare, Organization and Implementation Research, Boston, MA

Search for more papers by this author
Qi Chen M.D., Ph.D.

Qi Chen M.D., Ph.D.

Center for Healthcare, Organization and Implementation Research, Boston, MA

Search for more papers by this author
Jeanie Lo M.P.H.

Jeanie Lo M.P.H.

Health Economics Resource Center, Menlo Park, CA

Search for more papers by this author
William J. O'Brien M.S.

William J. O'Brien M.S.

Center for Healthcare, Organization and Implementation Research, Boston, MA

Search for more papers by this author
Megan E. Vanneman Ph.D., M.P.H.

Megan E. Vanneman Ph.D., M.P.H.

Informatics, Decision-Enhancement and Analytic Sciences Center, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake, UT

Department of Population Health Sciences, Division of Health System Innovation and Research, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT

Epidemiology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 24 September 2018
Citations: 26

Abstract

Objective

To assess differences in risk (measured by expected costs associated with sociodemographic and clinical profiles) between Veterans receiving outpatient services through two community care (CC) programs: the Fee program (“Fee”) and the Veterans Choice Program (“Choice”).

Data Sources/Study Setting

Administrative data from VHA's Corporate Data Warehouse in fiscal years (FY) 2014–2015.

Study Design

We compared the clinical characteristics of Veterans across three groups (Fee only, Choice only, and Fee & Choice). We classified Veterans into risk groups based on Nosos risk scores and examined the relationship between type of outpatient utilization and risk within each CC group. We also examined changes in utilization of VHA and CC in FY14–FY15. We used chi-square tests, t tests, and ANOVAs to identify significant differences between CC groups.

Principal Findings

Of the 1,400,977 Veterans using CC in FY15, 91.4 percent were Fee-only users, 4.4 percent Choice-only users, and 4.2 percent Fee & Choice users. Mean concurrent risk scores were higher for Fee only and Fee & Choice (1.9, SD = 2.7; 1.8, SD = 2.2) compared to Choice-only users (1.0, SD = 1.2) (p < .0001). Most CC users were “dual users” of both VHA and CC in FY14–FY15.

Conclusions

As care transitions from VHA to CC, VHA should consider how best to coordinate care with community providers to reduce duplication of efforts, improve handoffs, and achieve the best outcomes for Veterans.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.