Volume 44, Issue 4 pp. 617-635
Article

‘The Miracle of Density': The Socio-material Epistemics of Urban Densification

First published: 22 January 2020
Citations: 31
The research for this article was funded by the Wenner-Gren Foundation, the Social Science Research Council and Open Societies Foundation, the Inter-American Foundation, and Portland State University. I thank the participants of the panel ‘Design Matters' at the American Anthropological Association 2017 meeting for comments on an earlier draft. My thanks also to Yiping Fang and participants of the International Seminar at the Portland State University's Nohad A. Toulan School of Urban Studies and Planning in 2018 for their valuable input. The article also benefitted from the comments of the handling editor and two IJURR reviewers. Finally, I am grateful to the planners and experts in Bogotá who shared with me their deep knowledge and incisive observations.

Abstract

Despite being a foundational concept in urban studies and practice, urban density has remained relatively immune to critical study. In the midst of contemporary global housing and environmental crises, density has become an even more paradigmatic, almost common-sense urban category and planning idiom. This article interrogates urban density as a socio-material epistemology, as a knowledge form and practice about people, things and their mutual entailments. Based on archival and ethnographic research among city planning networks in Bogotá, Colombia, I draw attention to the political projects that are encoded in the supposedly technical physics and aesthetics of urban densification. Far from a stable, descriptive category, actors actively mobilize density to reimagine and craft urban worlds. The article tracks the shifting deployments of density in Bogotá from the middle of the twentieth century to the present, from approaches aimed at removing urban crowds and stimulating modern densities to recent projects aimed at regulating densification and rendering it more inclusionary. The article's grounded ethnographic analysis critically illuminates the ways in which the grammar of density—as a taken-for-granted metric of urban transformation and an ideology of socio-materiality—both shapes and limits the praxis of urban politics.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.