Volume 56, Issue 4 pp. 1229-1241
research papers

CrysFieldExplorer: rapid optimization of the crystal field Hamiltonian

Qianli Ma

Qianli Ma

Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Neutron Scattering Division, Oak Ridge, TN, 37831 USA

Search for more papers by this author
Xiaojian Bai

Xiaojian Bai

Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Neutron Scattering Division, Oak Ridge, TN, 37831 USA

Louisiana State University, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803 USA

Search for more papers by this author
Erxi Feng

Erxi Feng

Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Neutron Scattering Division, Oak Ridge, TN, 37831 USA

Search for more papers by this author
Guannan Zhang

Corresponding Author

Guannan Zhang

Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Computer Science and Mathematics Division, Oak Ridge, TN, 37831 USA

Guannan Zhang, e-mail: [email protected]; Huibo Cao, e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Huibo Cao

Corresponding Author

Huibo Cao

Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Neutron Scattering Division, Oak Ridge, TN, 37831 USA

Guannan Zhang, e-mail: [email protected]; Huibo Cao, e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 July 2023

Abstract

A new approach to the fast optimization of crystal electric field (CEF) parameters to fit experimental data is presented. This approach is implemented in a lightweight Python-based program, CrysFieldExplorer. The main novelty of the method is the development of a unique loss function, referred to as the spectrum characteristic loss (LSpectrum), which is based on the characteristic polynomial of the Hamiltonian matrix. Particle swarm optimization and a covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy are used to find the minimum of the total loss function. It is demonstrated that CrysFieldExplorer can perform direct fitting of CEF parameters to any experimental data such as a neutron spectrum, susceptibility or magnetization measurements etc. CrysFieldExplorer can handle a large number of non-zero CEF parameters and reveal multiple local and global minimum solutions. Crystal field theory, the loss function, and the implementation and limitations of the program are discussed within the context of two examples.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.