Volume 61, Issue 9 pp. 1263-1272

On the routine use of soft X-rays in macromolecular crystallography. Part III. The optimal data-collection wavelength

Christoph Mueller-Dieckmann

Christoph Mueller-Dieckmann

EMBL Hamburg Outstation, c/o DESY, Notkestrasse 85, D-22603 Hamburg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Santosh Panjikar

Santosh Panjikar

EMBL Hamburg Outstation, c/o DESY, Notkestrasse 85, D-22603 Hamburg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Paul A. Tucker

Paul A. Tucker

EMBL Hamburg Outstation, c/o DESY, Notkestrasse 85, D-22603 Hamburg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Manfred S. Weiss

Manfred S. Weiss

EMBL Hamburg Outstation, c/o DESY, Notkestrasse 85, D-22603 Hamburg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 16 August 2005
Citations: 2

Abstract

Complete and highly redundant data sets were collected at different wavelengths between 0.80 and 2.65 Å for a total of ten different protein and DNA model systems. The magnitude of the anomalous signal-to-noise ratio as assessed by the quotient Ranom/Rr.i.m. was found to be influenced by the data-collection wavelength and the nature of the anomalously scattering substructure. By utilizing simple empirical correlations, for instance between the estimated ΔF/F and the expected Ranom or the data-collection wavelength and the expected Rr.i.m., the wavelength at which the highest anomalous signal-to-noise ratio can be expected could be estimated even before the experiment. Almost independent of the nature of the anomalously scattering substructure and provided that no elemental X-ray absorption edge is nearby, this optimal wavelength is 2.1 Å.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.