Volume 69, Issue 5 pp. e135-e140
Original Article: Nutrition

Oxalate Content of Enteral Nutrition Formulas

Kristina L. Penniston

Corresponding Author

Kristina L. Penniston

Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, WI

Department of Clinical Nutrition Services, UW Health University Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Kristina L. Penniston, PhD, RDN, FAND, Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 1685 Highland Ave, 3258 Medical Foundation Centennial Bldg, Madison, WI 53705-2281 (e-mail: [email protected]).Search for more papers by this author
Eve A. Palmer

Eve A. Palmer

Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, WI

Search for more papers by this author
Riley J. Medenwald

Riley J. Medenwald

Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, WI

Search for more papers by this author
Sarah N. Johnson

Sarah N. Johnson

Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, WI

Search for more papers by this author
Leema M. John

Leema M. John

Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, WI

Search for more papers by this author
David J. Beshensky

David J. Beshensky

Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, WI

Search for more papers by this author
Ibrahim A. Saeed

Ibrahim A. Saeed

Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, WI

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 November 2019
Citations: 8

The authors report no conflict of interest.

ABSTRACT

Objectives:

Patients requiring oral and/or enteral nutrition support, delivered via nasogastric, gastric, or intestinal routes, have a relatively high incidence of calcium oxalate (CaOx) kidney stones. Nutrition formulas are frequently made from corn and/or or soy, both of which contain ample oxalate. Excessive oxalate intake contributes to hyperoxaluria (>45 mg urine oxalate/day) and CaOx stones especially when unopposed by concomitant calcium intake, gastrointestinal malabsorption is present, and/or oxalate degrading gut bacteria are limiting or absent. Our objective was to assess the oxalate content of commonly used commercial enteral nutrition formulas.

Methods:

Enteral nutrition formulas were selected from the formulary at our clinical inpatient institution. Multiple samples of each were assessed for oxalate concentration with ion chromatography.

Results:

Results from 26 formulas revealed highly variable oxalate concentration ranging from 4 to 140 mg oxalate/L of formula. No definitive patterns for different types of formulas (eg, flavored vs unflavored, high protein vs not) were evident. Coefficients of variation for all formulas ranged from 0.68% to 43% (mean ± SD 19% ± 12%; median 18%).

Conclusions:

Depending on the formula and amount delivered, patients requiring nutrition support could obtain anywhere from 12 to 150 mg oxalate/day or more and are thus at risk for hyperoxaluria and CaOx stones.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.