Volume 60, Issue 4 pp. 538-543
Original Articles: Nutrition

Clinical Tube Weaning Supported by Hunger Provocation in Fully-Tube-Fed Children

Caroline M. Hartdorff

Caroline M. Hartdorff

Department of Pediatrics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
C.M. Frank Kneepkens

C.M. Frank Kneepkens

Department of Pediatrics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Anita M. Stok-Akerboom

Anita M. Stok-Akerboom

Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Internal Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Elisabeth M. van Dijk-Lokkart

Elisabeth M. van Dijk-Lokkart

Department of Medical Psychology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Michelle A.H. Engels

Michelle A.H. Engels

Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Angelika Kindermann

Corresponding Author

Angelika Kindermann

Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Angelika Kindermann, MD, PhD, Department of Pediatrics, Academic Medical Center, H7-250, Meibergdreef 9, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands (e-mail: [email protected]).Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 April 2015
Citations: 44

This study was supported by a grant from the NutsOhra Foundation, Amsterdam, the Netherlands (SNO-T-08-071: Efficacy of hunger provocation for the treatment of pathologic food refusal in young children).

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

ABSTRACT

Background:

Children with congenital malformations, mental retardation, and complex early medical history frequently have feeding problems. Although tube feeding is effective in providing the necessary energy and nutrients, it decreases the child's motivation to eat and may lead to oral aversion. In this study, we sought to confirm our previous results, showing that a multidisciplinary clinical hunger provocation program may lead to quick resumption of oral feeding.

Methods:

In a crossover study, 22 children of 9 to 24 months of age who were fully dependent on tube feeding were randomly assigned to one of two groups: group A, intervention group (2-week multidisciplinary clinical hunger provocation program); and group B, control group (4-week outpatient treatment by the same multidisciplinary team). Patients failing one treatment were reassigned to the other treatment group. Primary outcome measures were at least 75% orally fed at the conclusion of the intervention and fully orally fed and gaining weight 6 months after the intervention.

Results:

In group A, 9/11 patients were successfully weaned from tube feeding (2 failures: 1 developed ulcerative colitis, 1 drop-out). In group B, only 1 patient was weaned successfully; 10/11 were reassigned to the clinical hunger provocation program, all being weaned successfully. Six months after the intervention, 1 patient had to resume tube feeding. In total, in the control group, 1/11 (9%) was weaned successfully as compared with 18/21 (86%) in the hunger provocation group (P < 0.001).

Conclusions:

Multidisciplinary clinical hunger provocation is an effective short-term intervention for weaning young children from tube feeding.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.