Volume 60, Issue 4 pp. 493-497
Original Articles: Gastroenterology

Esophageal Eosinophilia in Pediatric Patients With Celiac Disease

Is It a Causal or an Incidental Association?

Omar I. Ahmed

Omar I. Ahmed

Department of Pathology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC

Search for more papers by this author
Shadi A. Qasem

Corresponding Author

Shadi A. Qasem

Department of Pathology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Shadi A. Qasem, MD, Department of Pathology, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Medical Center Blvd, Winston Salem, NC 27157 (e-mail: [email protected]).Search for more papers by this author
Jehan A. Abdulsattar

Jehan A. Abdulsattar

Department of Pathology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC

Search for more papers by this author
Anthony N. Snow

Anthony N. Snow

Department of Pathology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City

Search for more papers by this author
Ivor D. Hill

Ivor D. Hill

Department of Gastroenterology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 April 2015
Citations: 17

This work was presented in abstract form at the American Society of Clinical Pathology 2013 Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.

Omar I. Ahmed and Shadi A. Qasem contributed equally to the article.

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

ABSTRACT

Objectives:

Celiac disease (CD) and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) are 2 distinct disease entities affecting the gastrointestinal tract of pediatric patients. Recently it has been suggested that EoE is more prevalent in patients with celiac disease than in the general population. We studied the association between these 2 disease entities in our pediatric patients.

Methods:

We reviewed our hospital files for suspected or confirmed cases of CD. Only cases with both duodenal and esophageal biopsies in pediatric patients were included. A total of 120 patients who met these criteria were included as the disease group. We also selected 100 patients with no clinical suspicion of CD and included them as a control group. Slides were reviewed using established criteria for diagnosis of both conditions. Duodenal biopsies were categorized as positive, negative, and suspicious for CD, whereas esophageal biopsies were classified as either positive or negative for esophageal eosinophilia (EE). Serologic and clinical data were additionally collected.

Results:

Sixty-two (62) cases were considered positive for CD in the disease group; among those 4 (6.5%) showed EE. In the control group, 91 cases were negative for CD, histologically, and 7 of those had EE (7.7%). Although 6 patients in the control group were histologically suspicious for CD, none of them had evidence of EE.

Conclusions:

Our findings show that, in our patient population, patients with CD are not more likely to have EE than patients undergoing upper endoscopy for other reasons. Therefore, we suggest that the association between CD and EE is likely incidental and not causal.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.