Volume 59, Issue 5 pp. 636-639
Original Articles: Hepatology and Nutrition

Liver Transplantation for Classical Maple Syrup Urine Disease

Long-Term Follow-Up

Victoria M. Díaz

Corresponding Author

Victoria M. Díaz

Centro de Salud Puerta Bonita, Madrid, Spain

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Victoria M. Díaz, Centro de Salud Puerta Bonita, Calle Alegría 24, 28025 Madrid, Spain (e-mail: [email protected]).Search for more papers by this author
Carmen Camarena

Carmen Camarena

Hepatology Department, Hospital Infantil La Paz, Madrid, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Ángela de la Vega

Ángela de la Vega

Hepatology Department, Hospital Infantil La Paz, Madrid, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Mercedes Martínez-Pardo

Mercedes Martínez-Pardo

Pediatric Department, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Carmen Díaz

Carmen Díaz

Hepatology Department, Hospital Infantil La Paz, Madrid, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Manuel López

Manuel López

Pediatric Surgery Department, Hospital Infantil La Paz, Madrid, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Francisco Hernández

Francisco Hernández

Pediatric Surgery Department, Hospital Infantil La Paz, Madrid, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Ane Andrés

Ane Andrés

Pediatric Surgery Department, Hospital Infantil La Paz, Madrid, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Paloma Jara

Paloma Jara

Hepatology Department, Hospital Infantil La Paz, Madrid, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 November 2014
Citations: 43

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

ABSTRACT

Objectives:

The aim of the study was to evaluate indications, results, and clinical and neurological evolution in children who have undergone liver transplantation for classical maple syrup urine disease (MSUD).

Methods:

Descriptive study of liver transplantation for MSUD between 1991 and 2012. Eight patients were transplanted.

Results:

Indications for transplant were poor metabolic control expressed as significant psychomotor disabilities (4 had psychomotor delays, 5 had spasticity, and 5 had epilepsy) and poor quality of life (mean number of acute metabolic decompensations and mean number of total hospitalizations before transplantation 5 and 12, respectively). Four required nasogastric tube, with a maximum 4 g/day protein-restricted diet in all of them. Seven sustained significant alterations in brain magnetic resonance imaging. Mean leucine and alloisoleucine levels were 608 (standard deviation [SD] 516) and 218 μmol/L (SD 216), respectively. All of the patients received transplants with deceased-donor livers, with ages between 1.5 and 2.5 years (mean 1.78 years). Mean posttransplantation follow-up period was 12.2 years (range 5–21 years). Final patient and graft survival was 87.5% and 75%, respectively. Following transplantation, none required hospitalization in the last 3 years nor did any have new acute metabolic decompensations following a normal diet. Five followed normal schooling, 2 had motor disabilities, and 2 had convulsive crises. Brain magnetic resonance imaging was taken in 4 patients, showing neuroimage improvement in 3 of them. Mean leucine levels were <350 μmol/L from the immediate posttransplantation period (mean 225 μmol/L, SD 78), with a maximum alloisoleucine level of 20 μmol/L.

Conclusions:

Liver transplantation is an effective treatment for classical MSUD that arrests brain damage, although it does not reverse the process.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.