Volume 35, Issue 3 pp. 512-527
Article
Full Access

How Should We Harvest an Animal that Can Live for Centuries?

Daniel R. Hennen

Corresponding Author

Daniel R. Hennen

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Northeast Fisheries Science Center, 166 Water Street, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, 02543-1026 USA

E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 21 May 2015
Citations: 9

Abstract

The ocean quahog Arctica islandica is an extremely long-lived and slow-growing marine bivalve that supports fisheries in several countries bordering the northern Atlantic ocean. The life history of the ocean quahog presents several unique challenges to fishery managers. Scientists currently have a poor understanding of recruitment and how it might respond to declining population biomass due to fishing pressure, in part because most fisheries have operated for less than one ocean quahog generation. It is therefore difficult to develop management quantities, such as biological reference points, by using traditional means. This simulation study examines ocean quahog recruitment dynamics and explores the implications of a suite of fishing intensities and biomass reference points. Results support the following recommendations: (1) ocean quahog fisheries should be prosecuted with very low fishing mortality rates (F), as Ftarget values greater than 0.03 tended to result in fishery closures while not having much effect on yield; (2) given a low Ftarget, ocean quahog fisheries are likely to tolerate a relatively low biomass threshold value; and (3) an understanding of spatial structure is important for maintaining a functional ocean quahog fishery.

Received July 28, 2015; accepted January 26, 2015

The ocean quahog Arctica islandica is a widely distributed marine bivalve that occurs from Cape Hatteras, North Carolina, USA, northward around the continental shelf waters in the North Atlantic to the Bay of Cadiz, Spain (Ropes 1978). There is a fishery for ocean quahogs in Iceland, and they are found as far north as the Barents Sea. The U.S. stock extends from North Carolina to the Canadian border. The U.S. ocean quahog population consists of at least two major metapopulations (one on Georges Bank and another south and west of New England) that may be reproductively isolated, although this is an open question. There are major concentrations of ocean quahogs on Georges Bank and off Long Island, where most of the commercial landings occur. The ocean quahog is a relatively deepwater clam species, most frequently occurring between depths of 10 and 400 m depending on latitude (Theroux and Wigley 1983). Ocean quahogs are suspension feeders with short siphons, requiring them to come close to the sediment boundary to feed (Cargnelli et al. 1999).

The ocean quahog is considered the longest-living noncolonial animal (Ridgway and Richardson 2011) and may be capable of surviving more than 500 years (Butler et al. 2013). The instantaneous natural mortality rate (M) of ocean quahogs is uncertain, but their extreme longevity implies that M is very low. The current estimate of M used in U.S. stock assessments is 0.02 per year (Chute et al. 2013). At this level of M, about 1% of a cohort would be expected survive for at least 230 years.

Recruitment to the ocean quahog population is not well understood but appears to involve a steady influx of a low number of recruits interspersed with infrequent large year-classes. Large classes of recruits appear unpredictably and regionally, often with intervals exceeding 10 years, but intervals greater than 30 years have been observed (Lewis et al. 2001; Powell and Mann 2005). Because ocean quahogs grow slowly after their first few years of life, recruit classes gradually enter the fishery decades after they settle.

Long life, sporadic recruitment, and slow growth coupled with the size selectivity of the fishery mean that ocean quahogs become vulnerable to fishing very slowly relative to other commercially exploited species. The spacing between the bars of commercial dredges is set to allow small animals to escape. The most common U.S. commercial fishing gear retains about half of the encountered ocean quahogs that have reached 75 mm (Chute et al. 2013), a size that requires about 30 years of growth in the mid-Atlantic (Lewis et al. 2001; Kilada et al. 2006; Harding et al. 2008).

The U.S. fishery for ocean quahogs has been operating continuously since 1967 (NEFSC 2009) and began on a small scale as early as 1943 (USFWS 1945). The history of commercial ocean quahog exploitation therefore spans a period that is less than a single generation for this species (∼83 years based on the generation time algorithm from Caswell 2001 and assuming that productivity is proportional to weight).

The difference in time scales between the fishery and ocean quahog population dynamics leads to difficulties in management and in understanding how the population responds to fishing. In particular, detection of any compensatory response to fishing mortality (F) as the population approaches (hypothetical) maximum sustainable yield (MSY) would take a very long time. It is possible that reducing the ocean quahog population relative to its carrying capacity will induce more-frequent or stronger recruitment year-classes, but this is difficult to determine given the long life span of ocean quahogs and the apparently infrequent and aperiodic nature of their recruitment. It is also possible that recruitment does not depend on density but rather is driven by environmental or other density-independent factors and that no compensatory response in recruitment will occur as the population decreases.

Currently, there is no direct estimate of BMSY (the biomass commensurate with MSY) available for use in managing U.S. ocean quahogs. Managers have set a target biomass level (Btarget) equal to one-half the estimated “virgin” biomass (Bvirgin; i.e., the estimated biomass from a period in which the stock was lightly fished), which is considered equivalent to BMSY in the absence of traditional reference points. The biomass threshold that would trigger an “overfished” designation and the cessation of fishing is set at Bthreshold = 0.4·Bvirgin. The current Fthreshold (the level of F at which overfishing is said to be occurring) is equal to F45% (the F that reduces lifetime egg production to 45% of its potential). This Fthreshold is based on a suite of long-lived and relatively unproductive Pacific Ocean fishes (Clark 2002; Dorn 2002; NEFSC 2009; Chute et al. 2013). The current Ftarget is undefined but must be less than Fthreshold. These biomass reference points are essentially ad hoc, and to date there has been no in-depth examination of the potential effects of these reference points (or any others) on the ocean quahog population.

Other management effects have not been examined in detail for this fishery. For example, although it is known that ocean quahog recruitment is regional (Powell and Mann 2005), ocean quahogs in the USA are thought to comprise a single stock and are managed as such even though metapopulations may exist (Chute et al. 2013). Whether or how this coarse spatial scale of management affects the population over time is not known.

In 2012, the U.S. ocean quahog fishery generated about 15.83 million kg (34.9 million lb) of meats valued at nearly $39 million (NEFSC 2013). There is considerable political and social interest in sustaining this productive fishery, but relatively little research on long-term harvest strategies is available to support management.

I used a simulation model to examine potential biomass and F reference points for ocean quahogs given a range of possible compensatory responses in recruitment and differing spatial scales of management. The goal of this study was to outline harvest strategies that are likely to perform well for ocean quahogs and potentially other slow-growing, long-lived stocks.

METHODS

Simulation model

The population simulation model was age structured such that for ages a,
urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0001(1)
where amax = 300 years; Nt,a is the number of animals at age a in year t; Rt is the number of recruits in year t (see below); and Zt,a is the instantaneous total mortality in year t at age a, defined by
urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0002(2)
where Ft is the fully selected F in year t; Sa is the fishery selectivity at age a, converted from selectivity at length (see below); and M is the natural mortality rate, which was assumed constant over time and across ages.
The spawning stock biomass (SSB) for each age in each year (SSBt,a) was determined as
urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0003(3)
where Wt,a is weight (g) at age a in year t. Maturity in year t (Matt,a) was modeled first by length L, defined as
urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0004(4)
where the parameters are as estimated by Thorarinsdottir and Jacobson (2005); and MatL is maturity at length L, which was later converted to maturity at age (see below).
Weight at age (Wa) was modeled as a function of mean L at age,
urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0005(5)
where La is the predicted mean length (mm) at age a such that
urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0006(6)
The parameters used in equation (5) were averaged values for each region from Chute et al. (2013). The parameters in equation (6) were averaged from the studies cited by Kilada et al. (2006). Growth was made linear for the first 10 years (from ∼1–5 cm) for lack of better information. The conversion from age to length (equation 6) was used to predict maturity at age from MatL (equation 4).
Fishery selectivity at age (Sa) measures the relative impact of fishing on different age-groups. It was defined as the relative proportion of age-a animals encountered and caught and was modeled as a function of La, where
urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0007(7)
with parameters from Thorarinsdottir and Jacobson (2005).
The yield from the fishery at time t (Yt) was calculated as
urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0008(8)

where urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0009 (Baranov 1918).

Recruitment model

Recruitment in year t (Rt) had both deterministic and stochastic components. The deterministic component followed Beverton–Holt dynamics (Beverton and Holt 1957), whereas the stochastic component included annual lognormal deviations and an episodic multiplier:
urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0010(9)
where
urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0011
SSBRf=0 is the equilibrium unfished SSB per recruit; R0 is equilibrium unfished recruitment; and h is a simulation-specific random variable representing steepness (Table 1). The bounds on h were based on the work of He et al. (2006), who demonstrated that h was likely to be very low for a population with a low M and moderate recruitment variability. The stochastic terms ɛR,t and urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0012 were intended to create small annual fluctuations (ɛR,t) as well as episodic large (or small) recruitment events urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0013 approximately every 30 years.
Table 1. Sampling distributions of random variables used in the simulations of ocean quahog recruitment dynamics (h = steepness; M = natural mortality; Ftarget = fully selected fishing mortality target; φ = autocorrelation coefficient for assessment error; urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0014 and urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0015 = standard deviations of annual assessment error and implementation error, respectively; urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0016, urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0017, and urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0018 = standard deviations of the von Bertalanffy growth parameters; τ = fraction of unfished biomass [B0] corresponding to the biomass threshold; and τ + ν = fraction of B0 corresponding to the biomass target). For each simulation run, a random value for each variable was drawn from the sampling distributions shown.
Variable Sampling distribution
Continuous
h Uniform(0.2, 0.5)
M Uniform(0.01, 0.03)
Ftarget Uniform(0.0001, 0.15)
φ Uniform(0.0, 0.5)
σAt Uniform(0.0, 0.25)
σFt Uniform(0.0, 0.5)
σL Uniform(0.0, 0.0075)
σk Uniform(0.0, 0.0075)
σt0 Uniform(0.0, 1.62)
Discrete
τ {0.3, 0.35, 0.4, 0.45, . . . , 0.7}
ν {0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, . . . , 0.5}

Simulation setup

Simulations of a managed population like the ocean quahog population must account for management actions because the actions of managers will affect population dynamics. Management actions were simulated by including a simple control rule (based on a simplified version of the current ocean quahog control rule) with target and threshold levels of SSB in the base simulation routine. The SSBtarget was the desired level of SSB; SSBthreshold was the minimum acceptable SSB. If SSBt fell below SSBtarget, then Ftarget was reduced linearly, finally reaching zero when SSBt was equal to SSBthreshold (Restrepo and Powers 1999; Figure 1). This framework allowed for a comparison of various candidate biomass reference points (SSBthreshold and SSBtarget) as well as an examination of the population's response to management. Reference points were described by
urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0019(10)
Details are in the caption following the image

Control rule for the ocean quahog fishery: (A) the actual control rule in terms of fishing mortality (F) and spawning stock biomass (SSB), where F is constant unless SSB drops below SSBtarget, after which F declines linearly until it reaches zero at SSBthreshold (SSB0 = unfished SSB); and (B) the control rule as applied in each simulation run, where F is constant when SSBt exceeds SSBtarget and F is reduced when SSBt falls below SSBtarget. Simulated SSB units are thousands of metric tons.

and
urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0020(11)
where τ and (τ + ν) are the fractions of unfished biomass (B0) that correspond to the threshold biomass and target biomass levels, respectively. Values of τ between 0.25 and 0.50 (in increments of 0.03) and levels of ν between 0.0 and 0.5 (in increments of 0.1) were tested by drawing randomly with replacement from the candidate values. Thus, SSBthreshold ranged between 0.25·B0 and 0.50·B0, and SSBtarget ranged between 0.25·B0 and 1.0·B0 (Table 1).
All simulations included lognormal autocorrelated assessment error. Assessment error was included to mimic the uncertainty around biomass estimates from an assessment, and that error was autocorrelated to reflect a situation where an error in the assessment for one year was more likely to produce an error in subsequent assessment(s) (Deroba and Bence 2008). Assessment error was described by
urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0021
urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0022(12)
where urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0023 is the assessment error; φ is the autocorrelation coefficient; and ɛt is the year-specific autocorrelated random deviation. The parameterization of equation (12) makes urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0024t an unbiased estimate of SSBt (Deroba and Bence 2012).
A manager may decide on a particular Ftarget for a fishery, but that Ftarget might not be achieved exactly; this discrepancy is often referred to as implementation error. Implementation error was included by modifying Ft (where urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0025) such that
urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0026(13)
where urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0027 is an unbiased estimate of Ft, including lognormal implementation error ɛFt with error variance urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0028.

Simulated management included an “assessment” at the end of each 5-year period. That is, at the end of each 5-year interval, a decision to reduce Ft from its initial value (Ftarget) was made depending on the value of urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0029t relative to SSBtarget and SSBthreshold. The actual F experienced by the simulated population (urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0030) was then based on the (potentially) reduced Ft using equation (13).

Simulated management over different spatial scales

Recruitment, growth, and M in the U.S. ocean quahog population are not uniform across space. Rather, they appear to depend on regional conditions to some extent (Lewis et al. 2001; Powell and Mann 2005; Chute et al. 2013). Simulation results might be altered by combining the results from several independently recruiting areas in which ocean quahogs experience different life history parameters. To test this possibility, an additional set of simulations combined four regions with independent parameters for growth, h, and M and applied two contrasting spatial management scenarios. In all cases, recruitment events occurred separately in each region according to equation (9). Growth in each region was determined by
urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0031(14)
where N are normally distributed random variables with parameters (0, σx) (with x representing the Brody growth coefficient [K], theoretical age at zero length [t0], or asymptotic length [L] from the von Bertalanffy growth curve; von Bertalanffy 1938). Simulation-specific parameters for regional growth and M were selected from the distributions described in Table 1 and were then held constant for each region over that simulation. Because growth affects fishery selectivity at age (Sa; see equation 7), region-specific and simulation-specific Sa vectors were calculated. All other parameters (Ftarget, φ, urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0032, urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0033, τ, and ν; Table 1) were simulation specific but were shared among the four regions.

In the first management scenario, ocean quahogs in each region were managed as separate stocks. Under the separate-stocks scenario, each region had its own assessment in which the biomass for that region was compared with the biomass reference points (i.e., τ was equal for each region, although the B0 for each might be somewhat different depending on regional life history parameters and stochastic recruitment variability during the unfished portion of each simulation). The Ft for that region was then adjusted from Ftarget if necessary. The four separate regions were fished according to their individual urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0034 values after application of equation (13). In the second management scenario, ocean quahogs were managed as a single stock, and the sum of the biomasses from the four regions was compared with the biomass reference points (i.e., τ was multiplied by the sum of B0 in the case of Bthreshold), and the Ft for all regions was adjusted if necessary. Under the single-stock scenario, the regions were all fished according to the resulting urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0035, and yield was extracted from each according to equation (8) but by using the region-specific values of M, Nt,a, and Wa. For both management scenarios, total yield and total biomass were the sum of the yields and biomass from the four regions, and the CV of yield (CV[Y]) was the mean of the CVs for yield in each region. In both scenarios, the period between assessments (and subsequent adjustments to Ft) was 5 years to mimic a realistic assessment interval.

Simulation

The difference in functional time scales between ocean quahog population dynamics and fisheries management is striking. To illustrate this, performance statistics were reported twice during each simulation run: once after 100 years, a reasonable term over which to consider the effects of management on fisheries; and again after 1,000 years, a reasonable period over which to observe ocean quahog population dynamics.

Some parameters in the model, such as h and M, had unknown true values. Other parameters, such as potential values for management quantities like Ftarget or τ, had unknown effects on biomass and yield. To understand how these parameters affected the outcome of simulations, a range of values for each was examined.

In each new simulation run, a random variable was drawn for h, M, Ftarget, φ, urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0036, urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0037, τ, and ν (Table 1). These were constant for the duration of the run. The simulation was initialized by running a cohort based on the simulation-specific M out to amax. The proportion at age was then multiplied by R0. All simulations included a period of 1,000 years without fishing, intended to allow the population to stabilize. The simulation continued through 1,000 years with fishing, and new values were then drawn for 49,999 subsequent runs.

To determine how reference points affected biomass and yield, results from simulations (both with and without spatial complexity) were compared to the values of Ftarget, τ, and ν while considering the effects of φ, urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0038, urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0039, M, and h.

Analysis

To understand how the stochastic parameters affected simulation results, mean scaled biomass (urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0040), mean scaled yield (urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0041), CV(Y), and time without fishing due to implementation of the control rule (tF = 0) were compared to M, h, Ftarget, τ, ν, φ, urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0042, and urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0043. Interactions and main effects were examined with generalized linear models (McCullagh and Nelder 1989). In an example predicting mean biomass, the saturated model contained all of the main effects and selected interactions between the predictor variables as
urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0044(15)
where f represents the link function and b is the vector of coefficients estimated in the model. Models predicting biomass and yield were overdispersed relative to the Poisson distribution, so the error structure for the models described generally by equation (15) was quasi-Poisson with a log link function (McCullagh and Nelder 1989; R Development Core Team 2013). This distribution includes a dispersion parameter for variance and reduces the degrees of freedom for estimation accordingly.

The relative importance of predictors (e.g., h, Ftarget, and M) was determined using deviance tables. The number of simulations was large, and simulation results are not data in the traditional sense. Therefore, model selection approaches based on Akaike's information criterion would result in very complicated models in which nearly all of the tested covariates and interactions would be significant. The deviance table approach may also be better than conventional χ2 tests, which are more sensitive to the order in which explanatory variables are tested (Ortiz and Arocha 2004).

Variables tested included each categorical and continuous predictor variable and several interactions between the predictor variables. Linear models for deviance table analyses were fitted by sequentially adding main effects and interactions. As they entered the model, explanatory variables were judged statistically significant if they reduced model deviance by at least 5% of the deviance associated with the null (i.e., intercept-only) model. This allowed the explanatory variables that least affected the response variables of interest to be excluded from further consideration.

Simulation results were also plotted and inspected visually for indications of nonlinearity. In particular, after initial results showed that h was not an important predictor of biomass or yield, the results were binned over h-values to determine whether the effects of h were being masked by stronger effects, such as F.

RESULTS

Simulations

Because (τ + ν) and τ were highly correlated, results using each were similar; for simplicity, only the results from τ are discussed here.

Deviance tables showed that the effects of Ftarget, τ, and M were better predictors of mean biomass, yield, variation in yield, and time without fishing (tF=0) than any of the other candidate predictors or interactions tested (Table 2). Biomass tended to decrease with increasing Ftarget, while yield, variation in yield, and tF = 0 tended to increase as Ftarget increased (2, 3). Increasing M resulted in higher yields, more variation in yield, and less time without fishing. Higher values of τ produced higher biomass, more time without fishing, less yield, and greater variation in yield.

Table 2. Deviance table results for models predicting ocean quahog mean scaled biomass (urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0045, where SSB = spawning stock biomass and B0 = unfished biomass), mean scaled yield (urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0046), CV of yield (CV[Y]), and years without fishing due to management (tF = 0) over 100-year simulations (n = 50,000 runs). The candidate predictors were the target fishing mortality (Ftarget), steepness (h), natural mortality (M), the fraction of B0 corresponding to the biomass threshold (τ), standard deviation of assessment error (σAt), amount of autocorrelation in assessment error (φ), standard deviation of implementation error (σFt), and interactions of potential interest. Only predictors that explained at least 5% of the deviance relative to the null model are shown.
Response Significant predictors (% of deviance explained)
urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0047 Ftarget (80.2), τ (10.6), Ftarget · τ (5.1)
urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0048 Ftarget (52.7), M (27.5), τ (14.9)
CV(Y) Ftarget (87.9), M (6.3)
tF=0 Ftarget (59.3), σAt (19.7), τ (41.17), M (5.5)

There were two cases in which variables other than Ftarget, τ, or M were important in the deviance table analysis. The variable urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0049 was significant in predicting tF=0 (Table 2); increases in urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0050 produced more time without fishing (Figure 2). Finally, the Ftarget · τ interaction was an important predictor of mean biomass (Table 2). The interaction was, however, probably only meaningful at higher values of Ftarget (Figure 4). The effect of τ appeared to be relatively constant at low values of Ftarget; in particular, Figure 4 illustrates that mean biomass did not change much across all values of τ when Ftarget was less than Fthreshold.

Details are in the caption following the image

Mean scaled biomass of ocean quahogs (urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0051, where SSB = spawning stock biomass and B0 = unfished biomass) and time not fished due to management intervention (tF = 0) over the first 100 years of 1,000-year simulations, examined in relation to values of target fishing mortality (Ftarget), steepness (h), standard deviation of annual assessment error (urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0052), natural mortality (M), and the fraction of B0 corresponding to the biomass threshold (τ). Each box represents the interquartile range, the solid horizontal line within the box denotes the median, and whiskers indicate the range between the 0.025 and 0.975 quantiles (n = 50,000 runs).

Details are in the caption following the image

Mean scaled yield of ocean quahogs (urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0053, where B0 = unfished biomass) and the CV of yield (CV[Y]) over the first 100 years of 1,000-year simulations, examined in relation to values of target fishing mortality (Ftarget), steepness (h), natural mortality (M), and the fraction of B0 corresponding to the biomass threshold (τ). See Figure 2 for an explanation of box plot elements (n = 50,000 runs).

Details are in the caption following the image

Contour plots showing the combined effects of target fishing mortality (Ftarget) and the fraction of ocean quahog unfished biomass (B0) corresponding to the biomass threshold (τ) on (a) mean scaled biomass (urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0054, where SSB = spawning stock biomass), (b) mean scaled yield (urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0055), (c) the CV of yield (CV[Y]), and (d) time not fished due to management intervention (tF=0). In each plot, the darker colors are associated with lower values; for example, in plot a, the lowest urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0056 occurs in the lower right-hand corner, where Ftarget is high and τ is low. The vertical dotted line represents the current Fthreshold (0.022; Chute et al. 2013).

Simulated Management over Different Spatial Scales

The effect of spatial scale on management was minor across most of the response variables tested, at least when considering the first 100 years of simulation. Mean biomass was not substantially different between the treatments of spatial scale, but mean yield was greater under the single-stock management scenario (Table 3; Figure 5). However, the higher yields resulted in a tendency to overharvest and a higher probability of fishery closures due to management intervention. Under the separate-stocks management scenario, regional closures resulted in lower yield overall and more variation in yield but fewer years without fishing, as at least one region was usually above the Bthreshold—and thus was open to fishing—as long as Ftarget was low.

Table 3. Deviance table results from simulations testing possible spatial structures of ocean quahog management. Inputs were models predicting mean scaled biomass (urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0057, where SSB = spawning stock biomass and B0 = unfished biomass), mean scaled yield (urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0058), CV of yield (CV[Y]), and years without fishing due to management (tF = 0) over 100-year simulations (n = 50,000 runs). The total biomass and yield were based on summed values from four regional stocks that were either managed separately or as a single stock, each assessed every 5 years. The candidate predictors are defined in Table 2.
Response Significant predictors (% of deviance explained)
Separate stocks
urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0059 Ftarget (82.9), τ (9.3)
urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0060 τ (73.1), M (20.4)
CV(Y) Ftarget (94.2)
tF=0 Ftarget (76.3), σAt (9.8), τ (8.7)
Single stock
urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0061 Ftarget (79.4), τ (15.1)
urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0062 M (36.5), τ (48.6), h (11.0)
CV(Y) Ftarget (95.6)
tF=0 Ftarget (80.2), σAt (13.6)
Details are in the caption following the image

Mean scaled yield of ocean quahogs (urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0063, where B0 = unfished biomass), mean scaled biomass (urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0064, where SSB = spawning stock biomass), CV of yield (CV[Y]), and time (years) not fished due to management intervention (tF=0), examined in relation to target fishing mortality (Ftarget), steepness (h), and the fraction of B0 corresponding to the biomass threshold (τ) from 100-year simulations. In these simulations, ocean quahogs from four regions with independent recruitment were managed either as separate stocks (SS) or as a single stock (1S; n = 50,000 runs for each scenario), with assessments occurring every 5 years in each case. The solid and dashed lines are fits to simple univariate generalized additive models (splines with basis dimension k = 5) and are used to illustrate trends only.

DISCUSSION

The objective of this study was to determine harvest strategies that are likely to perform well for ocean quahogs and to examine the complications induced by this species’ unusual life history. The search for a robust harvest strategy was conducted through simulation because critical life history characteristics of ocean quahogs are unknown. There are of course other ways to address this particular problem. Brooks et al. (2010) and later Mangel et al. (2013) demonstrated that specifying h and the shape of the stock–recruit relationship is sufficient for developing analytical solutions to management quantities, such as spawning potential ratio and MSY. In the case of the ocean quahog, we do not know the true value of h, but we can infer a reasonable range for it based on observed productivity and longevity and based on the meta-analysis conducted by He et al. (2006). It is therefore possible to take the approach of Hart (2013), for example, and develop a stochastic yield curve that incorporates the uncertainty in h to produce probability distributions around MSY. In the present case, however, there were many additional sources of uncertainty aside from unknown h, including uncertainty about M and growth, the stochastic component of recruitment, and the complication of potential spatial management. These factors combined to make the search for specific harvest recommendations unusual. The simulation approach taken here is similar to other management strategy evaluations (e.g., Smith et al. 1999) and explicitly incorporates uncertainty into management advice by integrating over a representative range of several unknown life history parameters, including h. The effects of different potential reference points were observed over many years and many simulations with many possible life history parameter configurations. The simulation results were used to identify reference point values that should work well over the range of potential sources of uncertainty. These were further refined based on species-specific management objectives, such as minimizing the probability of fishery closures.

Recruitment Model Sensitivities

One potential weakness is that the recruitment model may not accurately represent ocean quahog recruitment. The fishery is simply too young relative to the ocean quahog's generation time for us to detect any compensatory response to fishing. Therefore, any specification of a recruitment model based on observed data is potentially a poor representation of long-term ocean quahog recruitment when the population is subject to fishing.

The extraordinary longevity of ocean quahogs does mitigate this dilemma in one respect at least, as the current age structure of the population provides information about historical recruitment patterns. The analysis of Powell and Mann (2005) identified strong recruitment classes from decades prior to the start of the fishery. Thus, although we cannot predict the strength of any potential compensatory response in recruitment, we can be relatively confident that the simulation is approximating the frequency of strong recruitment events given a virgin population. The recruitment model used here integrated over a reasonable range of h-values and included a stochastic pulse recruitment component; the results did not appear to be sensitive to h over the range tested (Table 2).

The recruitment model was designed to mimic what little is known about ocean quahog recruitment. There is a small but noticeable amount of recruitment that happens each year. There are large year-classes that occur infrequently, sometimes with decades between them, and such year-classes appear to be random in periodicity. The magnitude of these year-classes is unknown, but there is anecdotal evidence that they can be very large. For example, the scallop survey run by the U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service once collected more than thirty-thousand 3-cm (∼6-year-old) ocean quahogs in a single 1.85-km tow using a 2.4-m scallop dredge on Georges Bank.

The specific values used for the recruitment parameters (urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0065, urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0066, and urn:x-wiley:02755947:nafm0512:equation:nafm0512-math-0067; equation 9) did not affect the overall results. Values leading to more-frequent pulse recruitment events of higher magnitude tended to result in a higher B0, while less-frequent and volatile recruitment had the opposite effect. Because biomass and yield performance statistics were scaled to be a fraction of B0, the starting biomass was unimportant.

Due to the large sample of simulations, the timing and magnitude of pulse recruitments in individual runs did not influence the overall results. However, they did influence individual results, particularly over the first 100 years of simulation. Early strong recruitment events tended to produce relatively high biomass and stable yield. This effect was balanced by runs in which recruitment was poor early in the time series, thereby producing low biomass and variable yields (due to fishery closures). The high number of simulations averaged these effects out, such that the timing of recruitment did not matter over the set of all simulations. In application to the real ocean quahog population, however, the period of strong recruitment events is likely to be important.

The use of a Beverton–Holt curve as the underlying mean spawning stock–recruit relationship around which annual fluctuations occurred was arbitrary, but there was no reason to expect that overcompensation leading to a Ricker-type curve (Ricker 1954) was warranted. Beverton–Holt dynamics have been used to model other long-lived, slow-growing stocks (Grigg 1984).

Other uncertainties included M, which was most important in predicting mean yield (Table 2). True M for ocean quahogs is unknown, but the range over which the simulations integrated should have encompassed it based on what is known about longevity. The highest value (M = 0.03) implies that only 1% of a cohort would survive to 154 years, whereas the low value (M = 0.01) predicts that 1% of a cohort would survive to 460 years. Those survival schedules appear unlikely based on the aging studies that have taken place (see Kilada et al. 2006; Harding et al. 2008) and because only one individual ocean quahog older than 460 years has been found to date (Butler et al. 2013).

Ocean quahog growth is known to be slow, but it should probably be studied in greater detail, as most of the work done on this topic is geographically limited (Kilada et al. 2006). Variability in growth was not explicitly considered here except as a factor in analyzing the effects of spatial management. From the perspective of managers, overestimation of M and growth would be problematic, as it implies a more-productive fishery and would tend to result in overly aggressive tactical management (e.g., higher F and lower SSB allowed). Industry would be more concerned with the underestimation of M and growth, which would produce overly conservative management quantities and would result in loss of potential yield. The results presented here should be reasonably robust to misspecification of M and variation in growth up to the magnitude shown in Table 1.

Simulation

Possible compensatory responses to fishing pressure were difficult to discern in the “short-term” (100-year) simulation series. The effect of h was masked by the stronger effects of F and the implementation of the control rule. When the population was simulated over 1,000 years with fishing, the effect of h was easier to see. When h was high, the population was able to compensate and stabilize at higher levels of fishing intensity, producing higher mean yields. At low h, the population could not adequately compensate for fishery removals, and the yields were low because the fishery was closed frequently due to implementation of the control rule. In all cases, the mean biomass was relatively stable over 1,000 years, indicating that the control rule appears to work well at all h-values (and Bthreshold levels) tested. The combination of an effective control rule and the size selectivity of the fishery, which allows ocean quahogs to have many years of reproduction before they are vulnerable to the fishery, probably dampens the effect of h on the population.

The effects of M on population-level response variables were largely predictable. A higher M, which implies a more-productive population, resulted in a higher yield and biomass. The relationship between M and time without fishing due to depletions and closures was interesting and illustrates some unusual properties. Although there was noise, a higher M was associated with a decrease in tF = 0 (Figure 2). The mechanism behind this result is the interaction of growth and the peculiarities of extreme longevity. When M was low, the population age structure tended to accumulate in the old age-classes, for which growth was very slow. At low M, ocean quahogs lived for a very long time beyond the age when they reached maximum length. Thus, even when the population is fished down, it can be quite old and therefore slow to replace biomass with growth. The result when fishing was applied was a depletion in biomass that took a long time to rebuild. When M was high, the population age structure was more concentrated in the young ages, for which growth is relatively rapid, and the population could replace lost biomass with growth in fewer years.

Higher assessment error increased the probability that the fishery would be closed due to management intervention. Misspecification of biomass tended to produce poor management advice and inappropriate use of the control rule. When assessment error was high, the resource was fished when it should have been closed to fishing, or the fishery was closed when it should have remained open. Both of these situations would tend to cause a higher probability of closure over time, as the population was either fished into depletion without necessary intervention, which would increase rebuilding time, or the fishery was closed without cause.

Maintaining very low fishing pressure was important in maintaining an ocean quahog fishery in simulation. In the short term (100 years), Ftarget values greater than 0.03 did not produce higher average yields than Ftarget values near 0.03. However, on average, Ftarget greater than 0.03 did result in a greater number of years without fishing due to management intervention and also reliably produced lower mean biomass values and greater variation in yield (Figures 2, 3). Although there was some risk of fishery closure at all of the F-values tested, Ftarget values less than 0.03 kept the probability of closure below 25% and kept the length of expected closure to one assessment cycle (i.e., 5 years) on average (Table 4; Figure 2). Minimizing the length and probability of fishery closures is particularly advantageous for a market-limited fishery in which additional supply has little additional value but in which there is constant demand. Such a market currently exists for ocean quahogs, which are an important constituent of mass-produced canned clam chowder (a soup sold in the USA and elsewhere; Serchuk and Murawski 1997) but have been fished at about 70% of quota for the last 10 years (Chute et al. 2013). The findings here support previous research recommending low harvest rates for long-lived shellfish (Zhang and Hand 2006), including the ocean quahog (Thorarinsdottir and Jacobson 2005).

Table 4. Probability of ocean quahog fishery closure (Prob.), mean and median closure times (years), and number of simulations conducted for each target fishing mortality (Ftarget) bin (bin midpoints are shown), illustrating that the probability and length of fishery closure increase with increasing Ftarget.
Ftarget Prob. Mean closure Median closure n
0.002 0.11 5.95 0 958
0.007 0.09 3.96 0 2,802
0.012 0.08 3.58 0 4,529
0.016 0.12 3.92 0 5,869
0.021 0.16 3.8 0 7,826
0.026 0.21 4.34 0 9,526
0.03 0.25 5.03 0 10,844
0.035 0.29 5.73 0 12,204
0.04 0.34 7.31 0 13,240
0.044 0.40 9.2 0 14,585
0.049 0.45 10.61 0 16,328
0.054 0.48 11.95 0 17,608
0.058 0.50 12.97 0 18,913
0.063 0.53 14.32 3 20,323
0.068 0.56 15.5 3 21,843
0.073 0.57 16.2 6 22,662
0.077 0.59 18.06 6 24,547
0.082 0.61 18.91 9 26,025
0.087 0.63 20.19 12 27,557
0.091 0.65 22.01 18 29,706
0.096 0.66 22.23 18 30,785
0.101 0.67 23.26 18 32,132

Results from the simulations were noisy, but the evidence suggests that SSBthreshold values on the lower end of the spectrum tested (0.25−0.50) may be suitable for ocean quahogs. Lower SSBthreshold values tended to produce less variation around higher yields as well as fewer fishery closures (Figures 2, 3). Lower SSBthreshold did produce lower mean biomass, but none of the SSBthreshold values tested resulted in high extinction likelihoods over 100 or 1,000 years. This is apparent in Figure 4, where the left margin of the contour plots show little variation over all tested values of τ, particularly when Ftarget is low (e.g., Ftarget < Fthreshold = 0.022).

The SSBthreshold and SSBtarget values were less important than Ftarget in part because low fishing pressure and the control rule were sufficient to maintain the population over 100 years. It is also important to emphasize that relatively early maturation, slow growth, and fishery selectivity play an important role in maintaining the ocean quahog population. These factors combine to give young ocean quahogs many years of reproductive capacity before they become vulnerable to fishing.

Simulated Management over Different Spatial Scales

Some modest benefits were evident for the separate-stocks management scenario as simulated here, although these depended on the market peculiarities that exist for ocean quahogs. Single-stock management tended to produce higher yields on average. However, the loose control provided by coarse spatial management implies that high biomass in one region can mask very low biomasses in other regions, similar to concerns raised by Molton et al. (2012) for populations with low intermixing levels. Such a situation could lead to depleted biomass conditions, as the high-biomass region regressed to average biomass levels and the low-biomass regions were rapidly fished down without triggering the necessary management intervention. This pattern resulted in higher yields on average over the first 100 years of the fishery, but as noted above, increased yield has little value in the ocean quahog fishery due to market limitations. Increased yield may also be associated with an increased risk of regional economic extinctions, which would take a very long time to rebuild due to the slow growth rate of ocean quahogs, but increased yield could also mitigate biological depletions, particularly if the threshold for economic extinction is high relative to the density of spawners required for successful reproduction.

There is an open question regarding the minimum density of spawning ocean quahogs required for effective reproduction. Because ocean quahogs are sessile broadcast spawners, they must occur at densities that are sufficient to permit the genetic material from males and females to interact. If ocean quahogs are fished below this density, depensation might ensue. For this reason and to reduce the probability of fishery closures, it would be prudent to manage separate regional aggregations independently, particularly if they are reproductively isolated. One possible safeguard in this regard would be the use of regional spatial refuges, which have been recommended for slow-growing, long-lived demersal fish species (King and McFarlane 2003). A spatial refuge might be effective for maintaining a regionally dense spawning aggregation, but it would have to be carefully placed to provide population-level benefits, which depend on the effective dispersal of larval animals. The dispersal of ocean quahogs has not been extensively studied but certainly relies on current forcing and temperature to a large extent (Zhang et al. 2015).

Discussion of refuges often leads to discussion of rotational management, a strategy in which an area is temporarily closed to fishing while a large recruit class grows to optimal size (i.e., ∼L). Area closures have been used successfully for other shellfish resources in the USA (NEFSC 2010). Because of their slow growth, ocean quahogs are very poorly suited to this type of management. An area would have to be closed for several decades to allow a large recruit class to reach a size that could be efficiently caught and processed. By the time the area would be reopened, most of the fishers who paid the opportunity cost of foregoing fishing inside the area would be retired (if not dead).

Simulations run over 1,000 years with fishing indicated that there was relatively little return in yield on Ftarget values greater than 0.03. Furthermore, fishing at Ftarget less than 0.03 induced a lower probability of depletion (and closures), whereas fishing at Ftarget greater than 0.03 incorporated some risk that the fishery would be closed for a substantial portion (often >50%) of the 1,000 years.

The results of this simulation study support the following recommendations. First, ocean quahog fisheries should be prosecuted with very low F, as Ftarget values exceeding 0.03 tended to result in fishery closures while not having much of an effect on yield. Second, given a low Ftarget and the current control rule, ocean quahog fisheries are likely to tolerate a relatively low Bthreshold value, as mean biomass was similar for threshold values between 0.25·B0 and 0.50·B0. Finally, an understanding of spatial structure is important for maintaining a functional fishery. Regions experiencing independent recruitment should be managed as separate entities, as stocks that were managed separately were less likely to experience depletion resulting in fishery closure.

These findings generally support previous advice regarding the management of long-lived species. Deep-sea fisheries, which are typically composed of long-lived, slow-growing fish, are often overexploited and rapidly fished down to economic extinction (Koslow et al. 2000). Low exploitation rates (1–2% of Bvirgin) have been recommended as potentially sustainable for these fisheries (Clark and Tracey 1994; Large et al. 2003).

The species most similar to the ocean quahog in terms of life history is probably the geoduck clam Panopea abrupta, which can live for more than 150 years. The geoduck clam presents an interesting case study because it is managed in typical fishery fashion in Canada but is managed more like a tree in the USA (Orensanz et al. 2004). In Canada, the fishery operates under a target exploitation rate of approximately 1% of Bvirgin. In the state of Washington, tracts of sea bottom (comprising a targeted percentage of the total biomass) are leased to fishers, who can then exploit them as they see fit. Tracts are only included in the pool of potentially leased area once the geoduck clams have recovered from any previous harvest. Both of these methods are controversial, and neither has been in place long enough (i.e., relative to the life span of a geoduck clam) to demonstrate which method is superior. It has been suggested that a simulation study similar to the one presented here might be a more useful way to determine a harvest strategy for geoduck clams (Orensanz et al. 2004).

Long-lived animals are difficult to manage sustainably. Effective management will depend on the particulars of life history and the characteristics of harvesters. Uncertainty regarding either the biology of the species or the behavior of harvesters will make management even more difficult. Management strategy evaluation through simulation can be an effective tool for choosing between harvest strategies for long-lived organisms, despite uncertainties.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Many thanks to Larry Jacobson, Liz Brooks, Jon Deroba, Andre Punt, Geraldine Vander Haegen, and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful insights and comments.

      The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.