Volume 8, Issue 1 pp. 65-70

Living related small bowel transplantation in children: 3-dimensional computed tomography donor evaluation

Fabrizio Panaro

Fabrizio Panaro

Department of Surgery-Transplant Division

Search for more papers by this author
Giuliano Testa

Giuliano Testa

Department of Surgery-Transplant Division

Search for more papers by this author
Nikhil Balakrishnan

Nikhil Balakrishnan

Department of Radiology-Bioengineering Laboratory

Search for more papers by this author
Bhaskara Rao

Bhaskara Rao

Department of Radiology-Ultrasound Division, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Diego Bogetti

Diego Bogetti

Department of Surgery-Transplant Division

Search for more papers by this author
Tomasz Jarzembowski

Tomasz Jarzembowski

Department of Surgery-Transplant Division

Search for more papers by this author
Cinzia Sammartino

Cinzia Sammartino

Department of Surgery-Transplant Division

Search for more papers by this author
Howard Sankary

Howard Sankary

Department of Surgery-Transplant Division

Search for more papers by this author
Enrico Benedetti

Enrico Benedetti

Department of Surgery-Transplant Division

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 06 January 2004
Citations: 12
Giuliano Testa, Department of Surgery/Transplantation Division, University of Illinois at Chicago-Medical Center, Room no. 402 Clinical Sciences Building, 840 South Wood Street, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
Tel.: 312 996 6771
Fax: 312 413 3483
E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Abstract: The evaluation of the small bowel vascular anatomy of living small bowel donors (LSBD) is usually performed with conventional angiography (CA). Recently, angio computed tomography (CT) has become a valid study of the vascular anatomy for kidney and liver living donors. We studied the applicability of angio CT with 3-D reconstruction (3-D-ACT) in the evaluation of LSBD. Potential LSBDs for pediatric transplant underwent both CA and 3-D-ACT to evaluate the anatomy of the distal branches of the superior mesenteric artery and vein. Angio-CT was performed with General Electric Lightspeed Scanner. The 3-D reconstruction was performed on the TeraRecon workstation. Adverse reactions, contrast dosage, test duration, invasiveness, hospital-stay, patient discomforts and accuracy were evaluated. Four potential donors (four female; mean age: 30.5 yr; mean BMI: 28.4) underwent both tests. Adverse reactions correlated to contrast agent used (90 mL CA, 150 mL 3-D-ACT) were not reported. CA required a hospitalization of 6 h as opposed to immediate discharge after the 3-D-ACT. The CA required the placement of transfemoral catheter and therefore greater patient discomfort than with 3-D-ACT. The 3-D-ACT arterial images were rated as equivalent to CA, however, 3-D-ACT venous images were rated better than the CA in all cases. CT-angiography with 3-D reconstruction is an acceptable method for vascular evaluation. When compared with routine angiography, it is less invasive, better tolerated and faster, but does require a significantly greater volume of venous contrast. 3-D-ACT also offers a better evaluation of the venous phase, and thus may become the test of choice to evaluate the vascular anatomies of LSBD candidates.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.