Volume 342, Issue 1 pp. 321-324

XMM–Newton observations of an absorbed z= 0.67 QSO: no dusty torus?

I. Georgantopoulos

Corresponding Author

I. Georgantopoulos

Institute of Astronomy & Astrophysics, National Observatory of Athens, I. Metaxa & B. Pavlou, Penteli, 15236, Athens, Greece

E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
A. Georgakakis

A. Georgakakis

Institute of Astronomy & Astrophysics, National Observatory of Athens, I. Metaxa & B. Pavlou, Penteli, 15236, Athens, Greece

Search for more papers by this author
G. C. Stewart

G. C. Stewart

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH

Search for more papers by this author
A. Akylas

A. Akylas

Institute of Astronomy & Astrophysics, National Observatory of Athens, I. Metaxa & B. Pavlou, Penteli, 15236, Athens, Greece

Physics Department University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis, Zografos, 15783, Athens, Greece

Search for more papers by this author
B. J. Boyle

B. J. Boyle

Anglo-Australian Observatory, PO Box 296, Epping, NSW 2121, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
T. Shanks

T. Shanks

Physics Department, University of Durham, Science Labs, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE

Search for more papers by this author
R. E. Griffiths

R. E. Griffiths

Department of Physics, Carnegie-Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 02 June 2003
Citations: 4

ABSTRACT

We present XMM–Newton observations of AX J0341.4−4453, a mildly reddened AV < 7 quasi-stellar object (QSO) at a redshift of z= 0.672. The XMM–Newton spectrum shows a large obscuring column NH∼ 1023 cm−2 corresponding to AV∼ 70, in agreement with previous results based on the lower limit of the ASCA hardness ratio. The X-ray spectrum is represented by a ‘scattering’ model with Γ≈ 2.0 and where the scattered power-law normalization is a few per cent of the hard component. No FeK line is detected with a 90 per cent upper limit on its equivalent width of ≈360 eV. The large discrepancy between the column density observed in X-rays and that inferred from the Balmer decrement can be explained by dust sublimation near the nucleus. Then, the X-ray and the optical obscuration come from two different regions: the X-ray close to the accretion disc, the optical at much larger > 0.25 pc scales.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.