Volume 24, Issue 1 pp. 73-80

Valproate population pharmacokinetics in children

B. Blanco Serrano PharmD

B. Blanco Serrano PharmD

* Pharmacy Service, University Hospital, Salamanca, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
M. J. García Sánchez PhD

M. J. García Sánchez PhD

Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
M. J. Otero PharmD PhD

M. J. Otero PharmD PhD

* Pharmacy Service, University Hospital, Salamanca, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
D. Santos Buelga PhD

D. Santos Buelga PhD

Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
J. Serrano PharmD

J. Serrano PharmD

* Pharmacy Service, University Hospital, Salamanca, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
A. Domínguez-Gil PharmD PhD

A. Domínguez-Gil PharmD PhD

* Pharmacy Service, University Hospital, Salamanca, Spain

Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 24 April 2006
Citations: 55
Dra.García Sánchez María José Departamento de Farmacia y Tecnología Farmacéutica, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Salamanca, Avda. Campo Charro S/N, 37007, Salamanca, Spain. Fax: 07 44 923294515; e-mail: [email protected]

Summary

Objective:A population analysis of the kinetics of valproic acid (VPA) in children with epilepsy was performed in order to characterize the covariates which influence VPA clearance (CL).

Methods: A total of 770 steady-state serum concentration samples was analysed. These were collected during VPA therapy from 255 children, aged 0·1–14 years and weighting 4–74 kg. Age, total body weight (TBW), VPA daily dose, sex and comedication with carbamazepine (CBZ) were considered as covariates. Population analysis was made with NONMEM program, assuming a one-compartment model, fixing the VPA absorption rate, bioavailability and distribution volume at values found in the literature. The results of the population pharmacokinetics analysis were validated in a group of 45 epileptic patients.

Results: The final regression model for VPA clearance, that included TBW (kg), daily dose (mg/kg) and CBZ comedication as covariates with a significant influence on this parameter, was as follows:

CL (L/h) = 0·012 TBW0·715 DOSE0·306(1·359 CBZ).

The coefficient of variation for interpatient variability in CL was 21·4% and the residual variability estimated was 23·9% for a concentration of 65 mg/l. In order to estimate the predictive performance of the selected final model, predictions of the VPA serum concentrations were calculated and compared with VPA measured concentrations in the validation group. This assessment revealed an important improvement in the predictive performance of VPA concentrations in comparison with the basic model that did not include any covariates (root squared mean error: 19·50 vs. 39·73 mg/l).

Conclusion: A population pharmacokinetic model is proposed to estimate the individual CL for paediatric patients receiving VPA in terms of patient's dose, weight and concomitant CBZ, in order to establish a priori dosage regimens.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.