Volume 101, Issue 4 pp. 653-655

High incidence of anti-heparin/platelet factor 4 antibodies after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery

Marc Trossaërt

Marc Trossaërt

Laboratoire d'Hématologie, C.H.U., Nantes,

Search for more papers by this author
Anne Gaillard

Anne Gaillard

Laboratoire d'Hématologie, C.H.U., Nantes,

Search for more papers by this author
Pierre Louis Commin

Pierre Louis Commin

Anesthésie-Réanimation, C.H.U., Nantes,

Search for more papers by this author
Jean Amiral

Jean Amiral

Serbio Research Laboratories, Gennevilliers, France

Search for more papers by this author
Anne-Marie Vissac

Anne-Marie Vissac

Serbio Research Laboratories, Gennevilliers, France

Search for more papers by this author
Edith Fressinaud

Edith Fressinaud

Laboratoire d'Hématologie, C.H.U., Nantes,

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 December 2001
Citations: 118
Dr MarcTrossaërt Laboratoire d'Hématologie, Institut de Biologie des Hôpitaux de Nantes, 9 quai Moncousu, 44035 Nantes Cedex 01, France.

Abstract

Fifty-one patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were studied on day 0 and day 8 for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). The platelet aggregation test (PAT) and tests for anti-heparin-platelet factor 4 (anti-H.PF4), anti-IL8 and anti-neutrophil activating peptide 2 (anti-NAP2) antibodies (Ab) were performed by ELISA. On day 8, 27% of patients were positive for anti-H.PF4Ab. None of these results were found to influence thrombotic complications or platelet counts after CPB. Our results suggest that IgG to H.PF4 may be considered a risk factor, but that additional factors must be required for HIT to develop. We conclude that assays based on platelet activation would be more appropriate for the diagnosis of HIT after CPB.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.