Volume 91, Issue 9 pp. 583-592
Original Article

Microtubule-stabilizing agents delay the onset of EAE through inhibition of migration

David O'Sullivan

David O'Sullivan

Centre for Biodiscovery, Schools of Biological Sciences and Chemical and Physical Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand

Search for more papers by this author
John H Miller

John H Miller

Centre for Biodiscovery, Schools of Biological Sciences and Chemical and Physical Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand

Search for more papers by this author
Peter T Northcote

Peter T Northcote

Centre for Biodiscovery, Schools of Biological Sciences and Chemical and Physical Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand

Search for more papers by this author
Anne Camille La Flamme

Anne Camille La Flamme

Centre for Biodiscovery, Schools of Biological Sciences and Chemical and Physical Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand

Malaghan Institute of Medical Research, Wellington, New Zealand

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 24 September 2013
Citations: 11
Dr AC La Flamme, School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

We have shown previously that microtubule-stabilizing agents (MSA), a class of anti-proliferative compounds, can delay disease onset and reduce cumulative disease in an experimental model of multiple sclerosis, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). To explore how MSA could alter EAE disease processes, we compared the effect of administering MSA before or after peak antigen-specific proliferation and found that treatment before proliferation completely inhibited antigen-specific responses in the spleen; whereas administration of an MSA such as paclitaxel or docetaxel after peak proliferation did not. Despite the presence of antigen-specific responses in mice treated at the later time point, both treatment periods resulted in similar protection against EAE, suggesting that the protective effect of MSA in EAE could not be solely attributed to anti-proliferative activity. Instead, using in vivo migration assays, it was shown that MSA inhibit immune cell infiltration into the central nervous system (CNS). Furthermore, we found that the efficacy of an MSA could be enhanced by administering low doses of two different MSA together, such as peloruside A and ixabepilone, indicating that these MSA synergize in vivo to suppress disease. Taken together, these data suggest that MSA can suppress EAE by at least two distinct mechanisms of action—prevention of proliferation and inhibition of migration into the CNS. Finally, we have shown that a combination treatment with synergizing MSA may provide enhanced protection at lower therapeutic doses.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

JHM and PTN hold a patent on peloruside A. All the other authors declare no conflict of interest.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.