One of the principal formulations of borderline personality disorder is based on object relations theory, a component of psychoanalytic theory. To remain relevant, psychoanalytic formulations must find support from empirical research. After summarizing the object relations understanding of borderline personality, the authors review studies in biological neuroscience, developmental psychology and cognitive science related to the fundamental concepts of object relations theory as it aplies to borderline pathology. This review suggests that these empirical studies support psychoanalytic formulations originally derived from clinical practice and observation.

References

1 Klein M. Envy and gratitude and other works. London: Hogarty Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis, 1975.
Google Scholar
2 Jacobson E. The self and the object world. New York: International Universities Press, 1964.
Google Scholar
3 Kernberg OF. Internal world and external reality. New York: Jason Aronson, 1980.
Google Scholar
4 Kernberg OF. Borderline conditions and pathological narcissism. New York: Jason Aronson, 1975.
Google Scholar
5 Nelson K, Grundel J. Generalized event representations. Basic building blocks of cognitive development. In: M Lamb, AL Brown, eds. Advances in developmental psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1987: 131–158.
Web of Science® Google Scholar
6 Stroufe LA. Infant–caregiver attachment and patterns of attachment in pre-school: the roots of maladaptive competence. In: M Perlmutter, ed. Minnesota symposium on child psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1983: 41–83.
Google Scholar
7 Ainsworth MDS, Blehar MC, Waters E, Walls S. Pattern of attachment. A psychological study of the strength situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1978.
Google Scholar
8 Main M, Cassidy J. Adult attachment classification system. In: M Main, ed. Behavior and the development of representational models of attachment: Five methods of assessment. Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Google Scholar
9 Oquendo MA, Mann JJ. The biology of impulsivity and suicidality. In: J Paris, ed. The psychiatric clinics of North America: borderline personality disorder. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2000: 11–25.
Web of Science® Google Scholar
10 Brown GL, Ebert MH, Goyer PF et al. Aggression suicide and serotonin: relationships to CSF amine metabolities. Am J Psychiatry 1982; 139: 741–746.
10.1176/ajp.139.6.741
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
11 Depue RA, Spoont MR. Conceptualizing a serotonin trait. A behavioral dimension of constraint. Ann NY Acad Sci 1986; 487: 47–62.
10.1111/j.1749-6632.1986.tb27885.x
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
12 Gurvits IG, Koenigsberg H, Siever LJ. Neurotransmitter dysfunction in patients with borderline personality disorder. In: J Paris, ed. The psychiatric clinics of North America: borderline personality disorder. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2000: 27–40.
Web of Science® Google Scholar
13 Gurvits IG, Koenigsberg H, Siever LJ. Neurotransmitter dysfunction in patients with borderline personality disorder. In: J Paris, ed. The psychiatric clinics of North America: borderline personality disorder. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2000: 28.
Google Scholar
14 Silk KR. Overview of biological factors. In: J Paris, ed. The psychiatric clinics of North America: borderline personality disorder. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2000: 61–75.
Web of Science® Google Scholar
15 Dodge KA, Tomlin AM. Utilization of self-schemas as a mechanism of interpersonal bias in aggressive children. Soc Cogn 1987; 5: 280–300.
10.1521/soco.1987.5.3.280
Web of Science® Google Scholar
16 Dodge KA, Frame CL. Social cognitive biases and deficits in aggressive boys. Child Dev 1982; 53: 620–635.
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
17 Dodge KA, Pettit GS, Bates JE, Valente E. Social information-processing patterns partially mediate the effect of early physical abuse on later conduct problems. J Abnorm Psychol 1995; 104: 632–643.
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
18 Yeamans FE, Clarkin JF. New developments in the investigation of psychodynamic psychotherapy. Current opinion in psychiatry 2001; 14: 591–595.DOI: 10.1097/00001504-200111000-00018
10.1097/00001504-200111000-00018
Web of Science® Google Scholar

Citing Literature

Volume14, Issue2

April 2002

Pages 76-80

An object relations perspective on borderline personality

Abstract

References

Citing Literature

References

Information

About Wiley Online Library

Help & Support

Opportunities

Connect with Wiley

An object relations perspective on borderline personality

Abstract

References

Citing Literature

References

Related

Information