Volume 11, Issue 6 pp. 546-554

Contribution of the periosteum to bone formation in guided bone regeneration

A study in monkeys

Dietmar Weng

Dietmar Weng

Department of Prosthodontics, Dental School, Julius-Maximilians-University, Würzburg, Germany

Division of Periodontics, Dental Branch, University of Texas at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Markus B. Hürzeler

Markus B. Hürzeler

Division of Periodontics, Dental Branch, University of Texas at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA

Private Practice, Munich, Germany

Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Dental School, Albert-Ludwigs-University, Freiburg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Carlos R. Quiñones

Carlos R. Quiñones

Ibero-American Institute of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Angela Ohlms

Angela Ohlms

Department of Prosthodontics, Dental School, Albert-Ludwigs-University, Freiburg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Raul G. Caffesse

Raul G. Caffesse

Division of Periodontics, Dental Branch, University of Texas at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 December 2001
Citations: 66
Dr Dietmar Weng, Julius-Maximilians-University, Dental School, Department of Prosthodontics, Pleicherwall 2, 97070 Würzburg, Germany
Tel.: +49 931 2017320
Fax: +49 931 2017300
e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

The periosteum has been referred to as a protective barrier in the regeneration of bone defects. The objective of this study was to determine the contribution of periosteum as a natural barrier to bone formation in guided bone regeneration. Mucoperiosteal flaps were elevated bilaterally on the buccal aspect of the mandibular angle in 5 cynomolgus monkeys. Bleeding was induced by perforating the cortical bone. A hemispherical titanium mesh was fixed over the areas thus creating a void 5 mm in height between the mesh and the bone surface. On one side the mesh was covered with an ePTFE membrane (test side). The contralateral side did not receive further treatment (control side). After 4 month healing, histomorphometric analyses were used to determine the percentage of new bone in the void underneath the mesh, and the ratio between mineralized tissue and marrow spaces in new and old bone. The mean percentage of new bone tissue was 77.2±7.5% for the test sides and 68.6±8.4% for the control sides (P=0.018, t-test). This new bone contained 80.0±3.6% mineralized tissue in the test group and 82.5±5.0% in the control group (P>0.05, t-test). In both groups the newly formed bone exhibited significantly less mineralized tissue than the old bone (P<0.05, t-test). It is concluded from this study that new bone formation was enhanced by the additional use of an ePTFE membrane under a periosteum-lined mucoperiosteal flap when space maintenance was excluded as a critical factor.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.