Volume 14, Issue 2 pp. 136-138

Mycophenolate mofetil increases cytomegalovirus invasive organ disease in renal transplant patients

Juan M Sarmiento

Juan M Sarmiento

Division of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN,

Search for more papers by this author
David H Dockrell

David H Dockrell

Division of Molecular Medicine and Genetics, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK,

Search for more papers by this author
Thomas R Schwab

Thomas R Schwab

Division of Nephrology,

Search for more papers by this author
Stephen R Munn

Stephen R Munn

Division of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN,

Search for more papers by this author
Carlos V Paya

Carlos V Paya

Divisions of Infectious Diseases, Immunology and Experimental Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 December 2001
Citations: 120
Corresponding author: Carlos V Paya, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Guggenheim 501, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. Tel: +1 507 284 3747; fax: +1 507 2843757; e-mail : [email protected]

Abstract

The impact of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection post-transplantation is in part influenced by the degree of immunosuppression. While mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) does not increase the overall incidence of CMV infection, we have questioned whether or not it increases its severity. Using a case–control study design in which 29 renal transplant patients developed CMV disease [17 (59%) of which received azathioprine (AZA) and 12 (41%) received MMF], increases in the frequency of organ involvement with CMV (58 vs. 18%; p=0.03) and in the number of organs involved with CMV were noted in the MMF versus the AZA group (2.0 vs. 1.0; p=0.015). These results indicate that the increased immunosuppressive activity of MMF impacts the morbidity of CMV infection, thus warranting the use of effective anti-CMV preventive regimens while patients are treated with MMF.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.